本文選題：誤診文獻(xiàn) + 退稿　； 參考：《臨床誤診誤治》2016年05期

【摘要】：正在第4期的"誤診文獻(xiàn)寫作"專欄中,我們提及《臨床誤診誤治》雜志近5年誤診類文稿的刊稿率為43.28%,盡管遠(yuǎn)高于非誤診類文稿8.94%的刊稿率~([1]),但仍有約半數(shù)的稿件退稿,原因有哪些呢?筆者結(jié)合審稿體會進(jìn)行簡要分析。1疑似學(xué)術(shù)不端控制和防范學(xué)術(shù)不端文獻(xiàn)出版是學(xué)術(shù)期刊的一項(xiàng)重要責(zé)任和義務(wù),學(xué)術(shù)不端文獻(xiàn)檢測結(jié)果是期刊編輯部判斷作者是否存在學(xué)術(shù)不端行為的主要依據(jù)~([2])。所有來稿進(jìn)入編輯部的首要審查關(guān)是經(jīng)中國知網(wǎng)的學(xué)術(shù)不端檢測系統(tǒng)檢測,論文重復(fù)率≥30%則為疑似學(xué)術(shù)不端
[Abstract]:In the fourth issue of the "misdiagnosis Literature Writing" column, we mentioned that the misdiagnosis and mistreatment of "Clinical misdiagnosis and mistreatment" magazine had a misdiagnosis rate of 43.28 in the past five years. Although it was much higher than the 8.94% of the unmisdiagnosed manuscripts published ([1]), about half of the manuscripts were still rejected. What are the reasons? The author analyzes briefly that it is an important duty and duty of academic journals to control and prevent the publication of academic misconduct. The examination result of academic misconduct is the main basis for the editorial department to judge whether the author has academic misconduct. The primary examination of all submissions into the editorial department is the detection of academic misconduct through the China Knowledge-Net system. The paper repetition rate 鈮，

本文編號：2002053