本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán) + 權(quán)利濫用��； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化得背景下,國外軟件巨頭搶灘中國市場,利用其擁有的軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的霸主地位,對軟件市場進(jìn)行壟斷,嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了我國軟件行業(yè)及廣大用戶的利益。而隨著我國本土軟件行業(yè)的興盛,一些國內(nèi)軟件巨頭也開始濫用其軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán),嚴(yán)重危害了公眾利益。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度發(fā)展到今天,人們對于設(shè)立這項制度的價值判斷早已明確,那就是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)和實(shí)施應(yīng)有利于促進(jìn)技術(shù)革新、技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓和技術(shù)傳播,有利于生產(chǎn)者和技術(shù)知識使用者即公共利益之間的平衡。軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的表現(xiàn)形式主要有：捆綁銷售、技術(shù)禁止措施、掠奪性價格、障礙性條件等。對軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的認(rèn)定主要從行為主體、主觀狀態(tài)、客觀行為以及行為結(jié)果予以全面考察。對軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用認(rèn)定程序上,應(yīng)當(dāng)經(jīng)由有權(quán)的專門國家機(jī)構(gòu)或者法院予以確認(rèn),而對提起軟件濫用行為認(rèn)定的主體上,一般則認(rèn)為只要是認(rèn)為軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用對其權(quán)益構(gòu)成了現(xiàn)實(shí)損害的主體均可。由此,進(jìn)一步通過對軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用禁止的利益衡量,綜合考慮軟件權(quán)利主體與使用主體之間的利益衡量、軟件權(quán)利主體與競爭主體之間的利益衡量以及軟件權(quán)利主體與社會公共利益之間的衡量,進(jìn)而分析軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用禁止的必要性。對軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)可以通過有效的抗辯機(jī)制,如合理使用、法定許可以及權(quán)利用盡原則可以對抗權(quán)利人權(quán)利主張。如此,才能真正讓軟件權(quán)利濫用得以禁止,真正實(shí)現(xiàn)軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)鼓勵創(chuàng)新和促進(jìn)技術(shù)進(jìn)步的初衷。
[Abstract]:Under the background of economic globalization, foreign software giants seize the Chinese market and take advantage of their dominant position of software intellectual property rights to monopolize the software market, which seriously damages the interests of the software industry and the vast number of users in our country. With the prosperity of domestic software industry, some domestic software giants also abuse their software intellectual property rights, which seriously harm the public interests. With the development of the intellectual property system today, it has long been clear that the protection and implementation of intellectual property rights should be conducive to the promotion of technological innovation, technology transfer and technology diffusion. It is favorable to the balance between producers and users of technical knowledge, that is, the public interest. The forms of abuse of software intellectual property mainly include: bundling, technical prohibition, predatory price, obstacle conditions, etc. The identification of software intellectual property abuse is mainly from the behavior subject, subjective state, objective behavior and behavior results. The procedure for recognizing the abuse of software intellectual property rights shall be confirmed by the competent special state agencies or courts, and the subject who initiates the identification of the software abuse act, It is generally believed that as long as the abuse of software intellectual property rights constitutes a real damage to their rights and interests can be. As a result, through the measurement of the interests prohibited by the abuse of software intellectual property rights, the interests between the subject of software rights and the subject of use are considered synthetically. This paper analyzes the necessity of prohibiting the abuse of software intellectual property rights by measuring the interests between the subject of software rights and the subject of competition and between the subject of software rights and the public interest of society. Software intellectual property rights can be countered by effective defense mechanisms, such as reasonable use, legal permission and exhaustion of rights. Only in this way can the abuse of software rights be prohibited and the original intention of software intellectual property rights to encourage innovation and promote technological progress can be realized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 唐超華;論作品的法定許可使用[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年04期

2 沈木珠,周倩倩;論對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的限制[J];政治與法律;2005年04期

3 張曉津;;計算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)侵權(quán)判斷問題研究[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年01期

，

本文編號：1992127