本文選題：版權(quán)技術(shù)措施　切入點：利益平衡　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 版權(quán)技術(shù)措施,是版權(quán)人在技術(shù)時代為應(yīng)對版權(quán)侵權(quán)行為而采取的一種施用于版權(quán)作品上,以防止他人未經(jīng)同意而接觸、使用作品的技術(shù),是一種以技術(shù)對抗技術(shù)的自力救濟方式。1996年,世界知識產(chǎn)權(quán)組織通過的《世界知識產(chǎn)權(quán)組織版權(quán)條約》和《世界知識產(chǎn)權(quán)組織表演和錄音制品條約》中,明確規(guī)定締約國有保護版權(quán)技術(shù)措施的義務(wù)。 版權(quán)法保護的技術(shù)措施必須滿足主體特定性、技術(shù)相關(guān)性及技術(shù)有效性三個條件。依據(jù)技術(shù)措施的功能,可以把技術(shù)措施分為控制接觸的技術(shù)措施與控制使用的技術(shù)措施兩類。法律對技術(shù)措施進(jìn)行保護并不意味著技術(shù)措施就是一項權(quán)利,技術(shù)措施只是一種保護版權(quán)的手段,方式,鑒于技術(shù)措施的特殊性,版權(quán)法對這種手段、方法給予了特殊保護。實踐表明,對技術(shù)措施的法律保護,極大地維護了版權(quán)人利益,抑制了猖獗的版權(quán)侵權(quán)市場。然而,版權(quán)技術(shù)措施的法律保護卻與版權(quán)法的基本原理、公共利益、市場競爭政策之間存在沖突。在對版權(quán)技術(shù)措施進(jìn)行立法保護的同時,有必要對其進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的限制。美國、歐盟規(guī)定,對技術(shù)措施除了設(shè)立具體的例外規(guī)避規(guī)則外,還設(shè)立例外審查機制,以上規(guī)定對我國有一定的借鑒意義。 我國雖然對版權(quán)技術(shù)措施在不同的立法層面進(jìn)行了規(guī)定,然而,仍有需完善之處。首先必須改變分散的立法模式,將有關(guān)技術(shù)措施的立法統(tǒng)一到版權(quán)法中,在版權(quán)法中單獨設(shè)立一章或在司法解釋中單獨設(shè)立一章。具體的完善內(nèi)容則應(yīng)當(dāng)包括：明確版權(quán)技術(shù)措施的定義；確立違反版權(quán)技術(shù)措施裝置的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；增加禁止規(guī)避版權(quán)技術(shù)的例外規(guī)定。此外,還應(yīng)在市場競爭法中規(guī)定,嚴(yán)禁濫用版權(quán)技術(shù)措施限制市場競爭。
[Abstract]:Copyright technical measures are a kind of technology adopted by copyright owners in the technological age to deal with copyright infringement in order to prevent others from using the works without their consent. In 1996, the World intellectual property Organization adopted the WIPO copyright Treaty and the WIPO Treaty on performances and Phonograms, Specify the obligation of States parties to take technical measures to protect copyright. The technical measures protected by copyright law must meet three conditions: subject specificity, technical relevance and technical effectiveness. Technical measures can be divided into two categories: technical measures for controlling exposure and technical measures for controlling use. The protection of technical measures by law does not mean that technical measures are a right, technical measures are only a means and a way of protecting copyright, In view of the particularity of technical measures, copyright law gives special protection to such means and methods. Practice shows that the legal protection of technical measures greatly protects the interests of copyright owners and inhibits the rampant market for copyright infringement. However, the legal protection of copyright technical measures is in conflict with the basic principles of copyright law, public interest and market competition policy. The EU stipulates that in addition to setting up specific rules of exception circumvention, the EU also sets up an exception examination mechanism, which has certain significance for reference to our country. Although the copyright technical measures have been stipulated in different legislative levels in our country, there are still some aspects to be improved. First of all, we must change the decentralized legislative model and unify the legislation on the technical measures into the copyright law. A separate chapter should be established in copyright law or a separate chapter in judicial interpretation. The specific perfect contents should include: defining the technical measures of copyright clearly; establishing the standard of the device for violating the technical measures of copyright; In addition, it should be stipulated in the market competition law that the abuse of copyright technology measures to limit market competition.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D997.1;D923.41

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 楊惠玲;馮濤;;論技術(shù)措施權(quán)利的法律保護及其例外[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年09期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 胡鐵強;版權(quán)技術(shù)保護措施立法之批判與選擇[D];中國政法大學(xué);2012年

2 李嘉莉;電子控制立法研究[D];廣東商學(xué)院;2012年

，

本文編號：1567227