本文關(guān)鍵詞： 著作權(quán) 質(zhì)押 公示模式 制度構(gòu)想　出處：《中南民族大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：著作權(quán)質(zhì)押是著作權(quán)利用制度的一個(gè)重要方面。伴隨著知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的到來(lái),知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)在我國(guó)日益得到重視。因?yàn)檩^之以往社會(huì)財(cái)富的表現(xiàn)形式發(fā)生了很大的變化,財(cái)富的表現(xiàn)形式不僅是土地、房產(chǎn)、資源和不動(dòng)產(chǎn)等有形資產(chǎn),而且包括專利、商標(biāo)、商譽(yù)、著作權(quán)等知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)在內(nèi)的無(wú)形資產(chǎn)。特別是對(duì)一些高新科技類的中小企業(yè)來(lái)說(shuō),新型財(cái)富的意義甚是重大,因?yàn)樗鼈兊呢?cái)產(chǎn)更多地是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)等無(wú)形資產(chǎn)。這些企業(yè)要發(fā)展就必須通過(guò)一定的方式來(lái)進(jìn)行融資,著作權(quán)等相關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押就為這些企業(yè)提供了嶄新的融資渠道。 第一,本文分析了著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的概念與特征。本文從著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的最一般理論著手,通過(guò)對(duì)比動(dòng)產(chǎn)質(zhì)押的概念,深入剖析著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的基礎(chǔ)理論,并且結(jié)合了《物權(quán)法》的最新規(guī)定。然而,2007年《物權(quán)法》在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押方面的規(guī)定并沒(méi)有在很大程度上突破原《擔(dān)保法》的局限,在對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押的問(wèn)題上的規(guī)定仍然是較為粗略和概括的,沒(méi)有對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押的效力的內(nèi)容、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押的公示、擔(dān)保權(quán)益的實(shí)現(xiàn)、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)設(shè)定質(zhì)押后使用費(fèi)的提存機(jī)關(guān)等細(xì)節(jié)問(wèn)題做出詳細(xì)的回答。 第二,討論了著作權(quán)質(zhì)押所存在的問(wèn)題。2007年《物權(quán)法》與《著作權(quán)法》等知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法及其實(shí)施細(xì)則之間存在一些銜接上的問(wèn)題。如,我國(guó)《物權(quán)法》明確規(guī)定了用作質(zhì)押的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)必須是“可以轉(zhuǎn)讓的”,而著作權(quán)許可使用權(quán)是否可以質(zhì)押并不明確,《著作權(quán)法》規(guī)定了著作權(quán)人轉(zhuǎn)讓著作權(quán)和許可使用該權(quán)利的情形。但是同樣的,這種按第24條產(chǎn)生的許可使用權(quán)是否屬于《物權(quán)法》第223條規(guī)定的“可以轉(zhuǎn)讓的權(quán)利”是不清楚的�！吨鳈�(quán)法實(shí)施細(xì)則》第25條規(guī)定著作權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓和許可“可以”在管理部門(mén)進(jìn)行登記。然而,在《著作權(quán)法實(shí)施細(xì)則》中并無(wú)著作權(quán)質(zhì)押或者著作權(quán)許可使用權(quán)質(zhì)押的規(guī)定。根據(jù)《物權(quán)法》第223條規(guī)定著作權(quán)的質(zhì)押只有在登記后方得生效。 第三,現(xiàn)有研究缺乏理論深度,只是局限在著作權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的表面問(wèn)題的一些探討。如對(duì)幾種特殊質(zhì)押標(biāo)的的探討,涉及到未完成作品能否質(zhì)押以及存在哪些制度上的缺失,這些問(wèn)題都是在本文討論范圍之列。此外,尚有一些重要問(wèn)題仍在討論之列,如著作權(quán)質(zhì)權(quán)制度的價(jià)值追求與平衡問(wèn)題等。 第四,指出著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的現(xiàn)狀及不足并提出粗淺的制度構(gòu)想。本文正是試圖克服實(shí)踐及學(xué)界中出現(xiàn)的不足,最后尋找到完善我國(guó)著作權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的出路,充分體現(xiàn)著作權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的價(jià)值所在,并提出立法建議供有關(guān)部門(mén)參考。
[Abstract]:The pledge of copyright is an important aspect of the copyright utilization system. With the coming of knowledge economy, intellectual property has been paid more and more attention in our country. The forms of wealth are not only tangible assets such as land, real estate, resources and real estate, but also intangible assets, such as patents, trademarks, goodwill, copyrights, etc., especially for some small and medium-sized high-tech enterprises. New types of wealth are of great significance because their assets are more intangible assets, such as intellectual property rights. If these enterprises are to develop, they have to finance them in a certain way. Copyright and other related intellectual property pledge for these enterprises to provide a new financing channel. First, this paper analyzes the concept and characteristics of copyright pledge. From the most general theory of copyright pledge, this paper analyzes the basic theory of copyright pledge by comparing the concept of chattel pledge. And combined with the latest provisions of the property Law. However, in 2007, the provisions of the Law on property Rights on the pledge of intellectual property did not to a large extent break through the limitations of the original "Guaranty Law". The provisions on the issue of intellectual property pledge are still relatively rough and general. There is no content of the validity of the pledge of intellectual property, the publicity of the pledge of intellectual property, the realization of the security interest, Set the intellectual property rights to pledge the deposit of royalties and other details of the organization to make a detailed answer. Secondly, the problems of copyright pledge are discussed. In 2007, there are some problems in connection between the intellectual property Law and copyright Law, and the detailed rules of its implementation. For example, The property Law of our country clearly stipulates that the intellectual property rights used as pledge must be "transferable", but it is not clear whether the right to use the copyright license can be pledged. The copyright Law stipulates that the copyright owner transfers the copyright and permits the transfer of the copyright. Where this right can be used. But again, It is not clear whether this right of use granted under Article 24 is "transferable" under Article 223 of the Law on property. Article 25 of the implementing rules of the copyright Law provides that "the transfer and licensing of copyright" may. "to register with management... however, There is no provision for the pledge of copyright or the right to use copyright license in the detailed rules for the implementation of the copyright Law. According to Article 223 of the Law on property Rights, the pledge of copyright shall only take effect after registration. Third, the existing research lacks theoretical depth, but it is limited to some superficial problems of copyright pledge system. For example, the discussion of several special pledge objects involves whether the work can be pledged or not and what system is missing. In addition, some important issues are still under discussion, such as the value pursuit and balance of copyright pledge system. In 4th, the author points out the present situation and deficiency of copyright pledge and puts forward a superficial institutional conception. This paper tries to overcome the shortcomings in practice and academic circles, and finally finds a way out to perfect the copyright pledge system in China. Fully reflect the value of copyright pledge system, and put forward legislative suggestions for the relevant departments for reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 朱文財(cái);海峽兩岸擔(dān)保物權(quán)法律制度之比較研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1495822