本文關(guān)鍵詞： 網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接 過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任 間接侵權(quán) 民事責(zé)任　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接技術(shù)是隨著信息技術(shù)的高速發(fā)展而出現(xiàn)的新技術(shù),它的出現(xiàn)大大降低了人們獲取所需信息的成本,打破了時(shí)間、空間對(duì)獲取信息的阻隔,對(duì)增進(jìn)社會(huì)發(fā)展起到了重大作用,網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接服務(wù)商也因此獲得了巨大的利潤(rùn)。 但作為新事物出現(xiàn)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接技術(shù),卻不可避免地遭遇到新事物的命運(yùn),即與原有的法律制度的沖突,網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接服務(wù)商在獲得經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的同時(shí),各種各樣的侵權(quán)事件也層出不窮,我國(guó)近幾年連續(xù)發(fā)生多起針對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接服務(wù)提供者提起的訴訟。這些訴訟顯示了搜索引擎出現(xiàn)后,著作權(quán)人、網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接服務(wù)提供者及使用者這幾方利益主體之間深刻而復(fù)雜的利益博弈。鑒于網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接服務(wù)提供商的侵權(quán)行為是廣泛存在的,如果不通過(guò)法律對(duì)他們的侵權(quán)責(zé)任進(jìn)行追究,就會(huì)使受害人的合法利益得不到保障,對(duì)社會(huì)環(huán)境也將造成負(fù)面影響。因此,鏈接服務(wù)提供商對(duì)侵權(quán)民事法律責(zé)任進(jìn)行研究具有很強(qiáng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文首先對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接技術(shù)進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要的概述,并從侵權(quán)行為法的角度,從搜索引擎服務(wù)提供者特定行為的法律性質(zhì)入手,探討在我國(guó)侵權(quán)行為法體系與背景下,對(duì)搜索引擎服務(wù)提供者應(yīng)當(dāng)適用何種歸責(zé)原則及判定其行為是否構(gòu)成侵權(quán)行為時(shí)過(guò)錯(cuò)的認(rèn)定規(guī)則。筆者認(rèn)為,在我國(guó)的實(shí)際環(huán)境下,應(yīng)適用過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則,并認(rèn)定其行為應(yīng)構(gòu)成間接侵權(quán),最后對(duì)我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接技術(shù)侵權(quán)方面的立法狀況進(jìn)行介紹,并結(jié)合具體案例對(duì)我國(guó)目前司法實(shí)踐中的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析。
[Abstract]:Network link technology is a new technology with the rapid development of information technology. It greatly reduces the cost of obtaining the information that people need, and breaks the barrier of time and space to access information. It has played a major role in promoting social development, and web-link service providers have made huge profits as a result. However, as a new thing, the network link technology inevitably encounters the fate of the new thing, that is, the conflict with the original legal system, the network link service provider at the same time to obtain economic benefits. A variety of infringement incidents also emerge in endlessly. In recent years, there have been a number of lawsuits against web link service providers in China. These lawsuits show that after the emergence of search engines, copyright owners. There is a profound and complex interest game between the network link service provider and the user. In view of the network link service provider's infringement behavior is widespread. If they are not investigated for their tort liability through the law, the legitimate interests of the victims will not be protected, and the social environment will also be adversely affected. The link service provider carries on the research to the tort civil liability has the very strong practical significance. Firstly, this paper gives a brief overview of the network link technology, and starts with the legal nature of the specific behavior of search engine service provider from the perspective of tort law. Under the system and background of tort law in our country, what kind of imputation principle should be applied to search engine service provider and how to judge whether its behavior constitutes tort or not? In the actual environment of our country, the principle of fault liability should be applied, and its behavior should be considered as indirect tort. Finally, the legislative status of network link technology infringement in China is introduced. And combined with specific cases to analyze the problems in our country's current judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賈暉;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

2 劉家瑞;論中國(guó)版權(quán)間接責(zé)任制度的建立——兼論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商責(zé)任制度的完善[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年11期

3 張今;數(shù)字環(huán)境下私人復(fù)制的限制與反限制——以音樂(lè)文件復(fù)制為中心[J];法商研究;2005年06期

4 朱軍;信息時(shí)代對(duì)著作權(quán)的新挑戰(zhàn)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1998年06期

5 胡為;;從著作權(quán)角度看網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的侵權(quán)責(zé)任——由五大唱片公司訴百度侵權(quán)案引起的法律思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年02期

6 韓薇;;淺析鏈接引起的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律糾紛[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年02期

7 張覺(jué)龍;張志偉;;淺談網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)的法律保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年11期

8 馮濟(jì)桅;;試論搜索引擎提供者的間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2007年09期

9 張學(xué)龍,周維德;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的鏈接責(zé)任歸責(zé)研究[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

10 劉開(kāi)國(guó);;紅旗標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在認(rèn)定網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者侵權(quán)責(zé)任中的適用[J];新世紀(jì)圖書(shū)館;2007年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1470132