發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-23 14:05

【摘要】：本文利用制造業(yè)企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)并運(yùn)用DEA方法測(cè)算了中國(guó)微觀層面的企業(yè)產(chǎn)能利用率,并以市場(chǎng)集中和空間集聚為切入點(diǎn)實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)了關(guān)于產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的兩類(lèi)理論觀點(diǎn):投資潮涌和市場(chǎng)涌入導(dǎo)致市場(chǎng)分散和產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的"發(fā)展階段說(shuō)";地方政府競(jìng)相促進(jìn)投資導(dǎo)致重復(fù)建設(shè)和產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的"地方政府說(shuō)"。測(cè)算結(jié)果顯示,中國(guó)制造業(yè)企業(yè)的平均產(chǎn)能利用率不到70%且在研究期間內(nèi)逐年下降。從內(nèi)部看,主要是大企業(yè)與小企業(yè)之間的產(chǎn)能利用率差異較大,前者往往高出30個(gè)百分點(diǎn),而行業(yè)、地區(qū)和所有制類(lèi)型之間雖有差異但均在10個(gè)百分點(diǎn)以內(nèi)。實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)表明,市場(chǎng)集中度和企業(yè)規(guī)模、空間基尼系數(shù)和政府補(bǔ)貼各自與企業(yè)產(chǎn)能利用率均顯著正相關(guān),但對(duì)雙方同時(shí)檢驗(yàn)時(shí)后兩者的顯著性和系數(shù)很不穩(wěn)定。這意味著市場(chǎng)過(guò)于分散、企業(yè)規(guī)模過(guò)小是全球金融危機(jī)前中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)中出現(xiàn)產(chǎn)能過(guò)�，F(xiàn)象的主導(dǎo)因素,而地方政府的重復(fù)性產(chǎn)業(yè)建設(shè)則通過(guò)影響市場(chǎng)分散和企業(yè)規(guī)模發(fā)揮作用。換句話說(shuō),在導(dǎo)致市場(chǎng)分散、企業(yè)規(guī)模較小的投資潮涌和市場(chǎng)涌入的推動(dòng)因素之中,由地方政府所主導(dǎo)的重復(fù)且分散于各地的同構(gòu)性產(chǎn)業(yè)建設(shè)便是其中之一。
[Abstract]:This paper uses the data of manufacturing enterprises and uses the DEA method to calculate the utilization rate of the enterprise capacity at the micro level of China, and the two kinds of theoretical points on the excess capacity are verified by using the market concentration and the space cluster as the starting point. The influx of investment and the influx of markets led to the "development stage theory" of market fragmentation and overcapacity; local governments are scrambling to promote investment in the "local government theory" of repeated construction and overcapacity. The results show that the average production capacity of Chinese manufacturing enterprises is less than 70% and is decreasing year by year in the research period. From the inside, the difference of capacity utilization between large enterprises and small enterprises is relatively large, the former tends to be 30 percentage points higher, while the difference between the industry, the region and the ownership type is within 10 percentage points. The empirical test shows that the market concentration and the size of the enterprise, the space-based Nini coefficient and the government subsidy are all positively related to the utilization rate of the enterprise, but the significance and the coefficient of both the market concentration and the enterprise scale are not stable at the same time. This means that the market is too dispersed, and the small size of the enterprise is the leading factor of the overcapacity in the Chinese economy before the global financial crisis, while the local government's repetitive industrial construction plays a role in influencing the distribution of the market and the size of the enterprise. In other words, among the driving factors that lead to the market dispersion, the small-scale investment in the enterprise and the influx of the market, the construction of the homogeneous industry led by the local government and scattered all over the country is one of them.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)博士后流動(dòng)站;銀監(jiān)會(huì)博士后工作站;南開(kāi)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家留學(xué)基金 中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目(NKZXA1402)的資助
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F424

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 國(guó)務(wù)院發(fā)展研究中心《進(jìn)一步化解產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的政策研究》課題組;趙昌文;許召元;袁東;廖博;;當(dāng)前我國(guó)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的特征、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及對(duì)策研究——基于實(shí)地調(diào)研及微觀數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];管理世界;2015年04期

2 何蕾;;中國(guó)工業(yè)行業(yè)產(chǎn)能利用率測(cè)度研究——基于面板協(xié)整的方法[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年02期

3 干春暉;鄒俊;王健;;地方官員任期、企業(yè)資源獲取與產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年03期

4 程俊杰;;轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期中國(guó)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩測(cè)度及成因的地區(qū)差異[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2015年03期

5 徐朝陽(yáng);周念利;;市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)內(nèi)生變遷與產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩治理[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年02期

6 董敏杰;梁泳梅;張其仔;;中國(guó)工業(yè)產(chǎn)能利用率:行業(yè)比較、地區(qū)差距及影響因素[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年01期

7 范林凱;李曉萍;應(yīng)珊珊;;漸進(jìn)式改革背景下產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)與形成機(jī)理[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年01期

8 王文甫;明娟;岳超云;;企業(yè)規(guī)模、地方政府干預(yù)與產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩[J];管理世界;2014年10期

9 鐘春平;潘黎;;“產(chǎn)能過(guò)�！钡恼`區(qū)——產(chǎn)能利用率及產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的進(jìn)展、爭(zhēng)議及現(xiàn)實(shí)判斷[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2014年03期

10 于立;張杰;;中國(guó)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的根本成因與出路:非市場(chǎng)因素及其三步走戰(zhàn)略[J];改革;2014年02期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王翔;;激勵(lì)扭曲視角下的產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩成因及化解機(jī)制研究[J];稅務(wù)與經(jīng)濟(jì);2017年03期

2 冀sブ，

本文編號(hào)：2351825