【摘要】：安全績(jī)效是企業(yè)生產(chǎn)運(yùn)營(yíng)績(jī)效的重要組成部分,是企業(yè)安全生產(chǎn)工作所取得的效果,反映了企業(yè)控制事故風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的能力。近年來(lái)如何提升企業(yè)安全生產(chǎn)績(jī)效的研究逐漸成為熱點(diǎn),主要包括兩方面：安全績(jī)效指標(biāo)的確定、安全績(jī)效評(píng)估方法的選擇。國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)此開展了大量研究,但在定義、安全績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系、研究方法等方面沒(méi)有形成廣泛的共識(shí)。并且傳統(tǒng)的安全績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系多為表示結(jié)果的滯后性指標(biāo),指標(biāo)體系的先進(jìn)性不足。因此本文引入世界級(jí)成功企業(yè)公認(rèn)的先進(jìn)管理方法—卓越績(jī)效管理模式,借鑒該模式先進(jìn)的管理思想,構(gòu)建安全績(jī)效管理模型及相應(yīng)的指標(biāo)體系。首先分析卓越績(jī)效模式的優(yōu)點(diǎn),明確其對(duì)于安全績(jī)效管理的可適用性,借鑒卓越績(jī)效模式先進(jìn)的管理思想,構(gòu)建了基于卓越績(jī)效模式先進(jìn)管理思想的安全績(jī)效管理模型。該模型包含7大目類：領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者、安全戰(zhàn)略策劃、企業(yè)發(fā)展與社會(huì)需求、審核、分析與改進(jìn)、生產(chǎn)者、安全過(guò)程管理、安全結(jié)果。該模型內(nèi)部含有2個(gè)小的PDCA循環(huán)和1個(gè)大的PDCA,強(qiáng)調(diào)過(guò)程管理和持續(xù)改進(jìn)。根據(jù)所構(gòu)建的安全績(jī)效管理模型,借鑒國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)安全績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系的研究,結(jié)合我國(guó)煤礦安全生產(chǎn)特點(diǎn),建立了基于卓越模式的煤礦安全績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系,該指標(biāo)體系包含6個(gè)一級(jí)指標(biāo),16個(gè)二級(jí)指標(biāo)及55個(gè)三級(jí)指標(biāo)。該指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建遵循了科學(xué)和理性的原則,能夠?qū)γ旱V企業(yè)提高其安全績(jī)效水平起到指導(dǎo)性作用。在指標(biāo)體系評(píng)估方法的選擇上,本文選取客觀性較強(qiáng)的數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析法來(lái)處理指標(biāo)體系,該方法具有天然的經(jīng)濟(jì)背景,能夠處理具有多輸入多產(chǎn)出的系統(tǒng),不需要預(yù)先估計(jì)參數(shù),也不需要提前確定輸入與輸出因素的函數(shù)關(guān)系式。應(yīng)用該方法進(jìn)行應(yīng)用研究,評(píng)價(jià)了W煤礦和X煤礦近5年的安全績(jī)效水平,針對(duì)非DEA有效的單元,提出改進(jìn)的意見和方向。
[Abstract]:Safety performance is an important part of enterprise production and operation performance. It is the result of enterprise safety work and reflects the ability of enterprise to control accident risk. In recent years, the research on how to improve the safety performance of enterprises has gradually become a hot topic, mainly including two aspects: the determination of safety performance indicators and the selection of safety performance evaluation methods. Scholars at home and abroad have carried out a lot of research, but in the definition, safety performance indicators system, research methods and other aspects have not formed a broad consensus. And the traditional safety performance index system is the lag index to express the result, and the index system is not advanced enough. Therefore, this paper introduces the excellent performance management model, which is recognized as the advanced management method of the world class successful enterprises, and constructs the safety performance management model and the corresponding index system by referring to the advanced management thought of the model. Firstly, this paper analyzes the advantages of the excellent performance model, defines its applicability to the safety performance management, and constructs the safety performance management model based on the advanced management thought of the excellent performance model. The model includes seven categories: leadership, security strategy planning, enterprise development and social needs, audit, analysis and improvement, producers, safety process management, safety results. The model contains two small PDCA cycles and one large PDCA, emphasizing process management and continuous improvement. According to the safety performance management model and the research on safety performance index system of domestic and foreign scholars, combined with the characteristics of coal mine safety production in China, a coal mine safety performance index system based on superior model is established. The index system includes 6 first-class indexes, 16 second-level indexes and 55 third-level indexes. The construction of the index system follows the principles of science and rationality, and can play a guiding role in improving the safety performance of coal mining enterprises. In the selection of evaluation method of index system, this paper chooses the objective data envelopment analysis method to deal with the index system. This method has natural economic background and can deal with the system with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. There is no need to estimate the parameters in advance, nor to determine the functional expression of the input and output factors in advance. The application of this method is applied to evaluate the safety performance level of W and X coal mines in recent 5 years, and the improvement suggestions and directions for non-DEA effective units are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：TD79;F426.21

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 仝震;王發(fā)明;高毅蓉;;煤炭企業(yè)中高層領(lǐng)導(dǎo)關(guān)健績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系的設(shè)計(jì)[J];山東工商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 尹紅;;電網(wǎng)企業(yè)績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系研究[A];2010年云南電力技術(shù)論壇論文集（文摘部分）[C];2010年

2 張彩平;肖序;;企業(yè)碳管理績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系研究[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)環(huán)境會(huì)計(jì)專業(yè)委員會(huì)2011學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 本報(bào)記者 黃曉琴;都邦：服務(wù)癡心不改 創(chuàng)新拒絕平庸[N];證券日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 記者阮緒波;公司ERP系統(tǒng)全面上線運(yùn)行[N];華北電力報(bào);2009年

3 嚴(yán)峻嶸;獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)最忌撒胡椒面[N];市場(chǎng)報(bào);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張金;地方政府績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2016年

2 劉崇順;同康醫(yī)院臨床護(hù)士績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系設(shè)計(jì)[D];天津工業(yè)大學(xué);2016年

3 張良;基于卓越模式的煤礦安全績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系研究[D];西安科技大學(xué);2015年

4 姜鯤;以戰(zhàn)略為導(dǎo)向的崗位績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建與應(yīng)用研究[D];河海大學(xué);2006年

5 戴敏輝;K公司績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2009年

6 李鳳廷;公共服務(wù)質(zhì)量管理績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系及其應(yīng)用研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2006年

7 胡媛;基于平衡計(jì)分卡的績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系應(yīng)用研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2005年

8 孫妍;省級(jí)電網(wǎng)公司戰(zhàn)略績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2010年

9 王杰;市級(jí)供電局變電運(yùn)檢工區(qū)績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系設(shè)計(jì)研究[D];華北電力大學(xué);2013年

10 林晨;面向戰(zhàn)略的流程企業(yè)績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系研究[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2267848