家庭支持對(duì)COPD患者自我管理、生活質(zhì)量及情緒管理的干預(yù)研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-03 20:24
【摘要】：目的通過(guò)對(duì)COPD患者的家庭支持系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行干預(yù),建立以家庭為中心的慢病管理模式,探討對(duì)COPD患者自我管理能力、生活質(zhì)量及情緒的影響,以期為有效提高COPD患者自我管理能力,改善其生活質(zhì)量和情緒,建立更合理的COPD慢病管理模式提供科學(xué)依據(jù)。方法便利選取青島大學(xué)附屬醫(yī)院100例住院COPD患者,按入院的先后順序分組,2013年11月至2015年1月收集對(duì)照組,對(duì)照組實(shí)施以患者為中心的慢病管理;2015年2月至2016年2月收集試驗(yàn)組,試驗(yàn)組對(duì)COPD患者的家庭支持系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行干預(yù),實(shí)施患者、患者配偶及其子女共同參與的以家庭為中心的慢病管理。對(duì)照組和實(shí)驗(yàn)組各50例,兩組干預(yù)時(shí)間均為6個(gè)月。采用自我管理量表、圣喬治呼吸問(wèn)卷(SGRQ)、6分鐘步行試驗(yàn)(6MWT)及綜合性醫(yī)院焦慮抑郁量表(HAD)評(píng)價(jià)對(duì)患者的自我管理能力、生活質(zhì)量及情緒的影響,采用家庭支持自評(píng)量表評(píng)估試驗(yàn)組家庭支持干預(yù)效果。所有資料應(yīng)用SPSS 17.0軟件包處理,計(jì)數(shù)資料采用c2檢驗(yàn),計(jì)量資料采用t檢驗(yàn)。結(jié)果本次研究,對(duì)照組患者50例,平均年齡65.46±6.49歲,其中男性36例,女性14例。試驗(yàn)組患者50例,平均年齡66.00±4.61歲,其中男性38例,女性12例。統(tǒng)計(jì)結(jié)果顯示:1.兩組患者在干預(yù)前的一般資料:性別、年齡、文化程度、家庭月收入、疾病嚴(yán)重程度、呼吸困難程度、自理能力、活動(dòng)能力、自我管理能力等方面的差別無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),具有可比性。2.患者自我管理能力:干預(yù)6個(gè)月后,試驗(yàn)組癥狀管理得分(29.54±2.40)、日常生活管理得分(49.16±5.59)、情緒管理得分(45.52±3.91)、信息管理得分(20.28±2.72)、自我效能管理得分(32.38±3.21)、自我管理總分(176.88±11.36),與對(duì)照組癥狀管理得分(23.02±2.72)、日常生活管理得分(41.92±5.01)、情緒管理得分(37.34±4.87)、信息管理得分(15.88±3.09)、自我效能管理得分(24.84±3.84)、自我管理總分(143.0±12.99)相比,試驗(yàn)組自我管理各項(xiàng)得分均高于對(duì)照組(P0.01)。3.患者生活質(zhì)量:干預(yù)6個(gè)月后,試驗(yàn)組圣喬治呼吸問(wèn)卷總分(37.59±9.03)、呼吸癥狀得分(37.5±8.64)、活動(dòng)受限得分(37.6±11.18)、疾病影響得分(37.5±10.81)、6分鐘步行距離(349.18±19.62),與對(duì)照組圣喬治呼吸問(wèn)卷總分(47.58±6.72)、呼吸癥狀得分(46.90±6.93)、活動(dòng)受限得分(49.65±8.78)、疾病影響得分(46.83±7.78)、6分鐘步行距離(285.24±19.79)相比,試驗(yàn)組圣喬治呼吸問(wèn)卷各項(xiàng)得分均低于對(duì)照組(P0.01),試驗(yàn)組6分鐘步行距離高于對(duì)照組(P0.01)。4.患者情緒:干預(yù)6個(gè)月后,綜合性醫(yī)院焦慮抑郁量表試驗(yàn)組的焦慮得分(7.42±2.88)及抑郁得分(6.04±1.82),與對(duì)照組的焦慮得分(9.34±3.37)及抑郁得分(7.52±2.02)相比,試驗(yàn)組焦慮得分及抑郁得分均低于對(duì)照組(P0.01)。5.試驗(yàn)組家庭支持效果:試驗(yàn)組干預(yù)前家庭支持量表得分(10.92±2.86),與干預(yù)后家庭支持量表得分(13.22±1.28)相比,試驗(yàn)組干預(yù)前家庭支持量表得分低于干預(yù)后(P0.01)。結(jié)論對(duì)COPD患者的家庭支持系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行干預(yù),實(shí)施以家庭為中心的慢病管理模式,能夠有效提高COPD患者的自我管理能力,有效改善其生活質(zhì)量及情緒。在當(dāng)前社區(qū)建設(shè)不完善的現(xiàn)狀下,醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)專業(yè)人員與患者及患者家屬共同建立有效的健康支持系統(tǒng),對(duì)促進(jìn)COPD有效的慢病管理具有積極意義。
[Abstract]:Objective To establish a family-centered slow-disease management model by intervening on the family support system of patients with COPD, and to explore the effect of self-management ability, quality of life and mood in patients with COPD, with a view to improving the self-management ability of patients with COPD and improving their quality and mood. To provide scientific basis for establishing a more rational management mode of COPD. Methods 100 inpatients with COPD were selected according to the order of admission, the control group was collected from November 2013 to January 2015, the control group was administered with patient-centered slow disease management, and the test group was collected from February 2015 to February 2016. The test group intervened in the family support system of patients with COPD, and implemented a family-centred, slow-disease management of the patient, the patient's spouse and their children. There were 50 cases in the control group and the experimental group, and the intervention time of both groups was 6 months. Self-management scale, St George's breath questionnaire (SGRQ), 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and comprehensive hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD) were used to evaluate the self-management ability, quality of life and mood of patients, and family support self-rating scale was used to evaluate the effect of family support intervention. All the data were processed by SPSS 17. 0 software package. The counting data were checked by cc2, and t-test was used for the measurement data. Results In this study, 50 patients with control group, including 36 males and 14 females, had an average age of 65. 46 and 6. 49 years old. Among the 50 patients, the mean age ranged from 66. 00 to 4.61 years old, among them 38 males and 12 females. Statistical results show: 1. The general data of two groups before intervention: sex, age, degree of culture, family monthly income, severity of disease, degree of dyspnea, self-control ability, activity ability, self-management ability, etc. were not statistically significant (P0.05). Patient's self-management ability: After 6 months of intervention, the symptom management score of the test group (29. 54/ 2. 40), daily life management score (49. 16/ 5. 59), emotion management score (45. 52/ 3.91), information management score (20. 28/ 2. 72), self-efficacy management score (32. 38, 3.21), The total scores of self-management (176,88 and 11.36) were compared with the control group symptom management scores (23.02/ 2.72), daily life management scores (41. 92/ 5. 01), emotional management scores (37. 34 and 4.87), information management scores (15. 88/ 3. 09), and self-efficacy management scores (24. 84 and 3. 84). Compared with the control group (P0.01), the self-management score of the test group was higher than that of the control group (P0.01). Patient's quality of life: After 6 months of intervention, the total score of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (37. 59/ 9. 03), respiratory symptom score (37. 5, 8. 64), Activity-limited score (37. 6, 11. 18), Disease Impact Score (37. 5, 10. 81), 6-minute walking distance (349. 18, 19. 62), were performed. Compared with control group St. George's respiratory questionnaire total score (47. 58/ 6. 72), respiratory symptom score (46. 90, 6.93), activity limited score (49. 65/ 8. 78), disease impact score (46. 83-7.78), 6-minute walking distance (285.24/ 19. 79), The scores of St George's breath questionnaire were lower than that in the control group (P0.01), and the walking distance of the test group was higher than that of the control group (P0.01). Patient mood: After 6 months of intervention, the anxiety score (7.42% 2.88) and depression score (6. 04/ 1. 82) of the comprehensive hospital anxiety and depression scale test group were compared with those of the control group (9.34 vs 3.37) and depression score (7.52/ 2.02). The scores of anxiety and depression were lower in the test group than in the control group (P0.01). The results of family support in test group: The scores of family support scale (10.92/ 2.86) before intervention were lower than that of intervention group (P0.05), and the scores of family support scale before intervention were lower than that of intervention group (P0.01). Conclusion The family support system of COPD patients can effectively improve the self-management ability of patients with COPD and improve their quality of life and mood effectively. In the current situation of imperfect community construction, the professional staff of medical institutions jointly establish an effective health support system with the patients and their families, which is of positive significance to the management of slow disease which is effective for the treatment of COPD.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R473.5
本文編號(hào)：2308927
[Abstract]:Objective To establish a family-centered slow-disease management model by intervening on the family support system of patients with COPD, and to explore the effect of self-management ability, quality of life and mood in patients with COPD, with a view to improving the self-management ability of patients with COPD and improving their quality and mood. To provide scientific basis for establishing a more rational management mode of COPD. Methods 100 inpatients with COPD were selected according to the order of admission, the control group was collected from November 2013 to January 2015, the control group was administered with patient-centered slow disease management, and the test group was collected from February 2015 to February 2016. The test group intervened in the family support system of patients with COPD, and implemented a family-centred, slow-disease management of the patient, the patient's spouse and their children. There were 50 cases in the control group and the experimental group, and the intervention time of both groups was 6 months. Self-management scale, St George's breath questionnaire (SGRQ), 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and comprehensive hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD) were used to evaluate the self-management ability, quality of life and mood of patients, and family support self-rating scale was used to evaluate the effect of family support intervention. All the data were processed by SPSS 17. 0 software package. The counting data were checked by cc2, and t-test was used for the measurement data. Results In this study, 50 patients with control group, including 36 males and 14 females, had an average age of 65. 46 and 6. 49 years old. Among the 50 patients, the mean age ranged from 66. 00 to 4.61 years old, among them 38 males and 12 females. Statistical results show: 1. The general data of two groups before intervention: sex, age, degree of culture, family monthly income, severity of disease, degree of dyspnea, self-control ability, activity ability, self-management ability, etc. were not statistically significant (P0.05). Patient's self-management ability: After 6 months of intervention, the symptom management score of the test group (29. 54/ 2. 40), daily life management score (49. 16/ 5. 59), emotion management score (45. 52/ 3.91), information management score (20. 28/ 2. 72), self-efficacy management score (32. 38, 3.21), The total scores of self-management (176,88 and 11.36) were compared with the control group symptom management scores (23.02/ 2.72), daily life management scores (41. 92/ 5. 01), emotional management scores (37. 34 and 4.87), information management scores (15. 88/ 3. 09), and self-efficacy management scores (24. 84 and 3. 84). Compared with the control group (P0.01), the self-management score of the test group was higher than that of the control group (P0.01). Patient's quality of life: After 6 months of intervention, the total score of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (37. 59/ 9. 03), respiratory symptom score (37. 5, 8. 64), Activity-limited score (37. 6, 11. 18), Disease Impact Score (37. 5, 10. 81), 6-minute walking distance (349. 18, 19. 62), were performed. Compared with control group St. George's respiratory questionnaire total score (47. 58/ 6. 72), respiratory symptom score (46. 90, 6.93), activity limited score (49. 65/ 8. 78), disease impact score (46. 83-7.78), 6-minute walking distance (285.24/ 19. 79), The scores of St George's breath questionnaire were lower than that in the control group (P0.01), and the walking distance of the test group was higher than that of the control group (P0.01). Patient mood: After 6 months of intervention, the anxiety score (7.42% 2.88) and depression score (6. 04/ 1. 82) of the comprehensive hospital anxiety and depression scale test group were compared with those of the control group (9.34 vs 3.37) and depression score (7.52/ 2.02). The scores of anxiety and depression were lower in the test group than in the control group (P0.01). The results of family support in test group: The scores of family support scale (10.92/ 2.86) before intervention were lower than that of intervention group (P0.05), and the scores of family support scale before intervention were lower than that of intervention group (P0.01). Conclusion The family support system of COPD patients can effectively improve the self-management ability of patients with COPD and improve their quality of life and mood effectively. In the current situation of imperfect community construction, the professional staff of medical institutions jointly establish an effective health support system with the patients and their families, which is of positive significance to the management of slow disease which is effective for the treatment of COPD.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R473.5
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 衛(wèi)家芬;劉瓊;陳建根;;病友會(huì)在社區(qū)穩(wěn)定期慢阻肺患者管理中的應(yīng)用效果[J];中國(guó)初級(jí)衛(wèi)生保健;2016年01期
2 方文添;陳梅華;王益琴;;家庭支持對(duì)慢性粒細(xì)胞白血病患者生存質(zhì)量的影響[J];中華現(xiàn)代護(hù)理雜志;2015年30期
3 陸秋霞;;病友會(huì)對(duì)穩(wěn)定期慢性阻塞性肺病患者呼吸操鍛煉依從性的影響[J];上海醫(yī)藥;2015年16期
4 紀(jì)冬梅;孫悅;王艷艷;;老年心力衰竭患者自我護(hù)理指數(shù)與家庭支持的相關(guān)性研究[J];中華現(xiàn)代護(hù)理雜志;2015年18期
5 賈秀芬;王君俏;楊雅;陸敏敏;;社區(qū)COPD患者家庭疾病管理現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查[J];護(hù)理學(xué)雜志;2014年19期
6 席明霞;覃琴;唐朝;駱永梅;卿利敏;;自我管理干預(yù)對(duì)慢性阻塞性肺疾病穩(wěn)定期患者肺康復(fù)行為和生活質(zhì)量的影響[J];護(hù)理管理雜志;2014年07期
7 吳錦珍;蔡淑慧;陳惜遂;;家屬參與模式在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康教育中的應(yīng)用[J];齊魯護(hù)理雜志;2013年15期
8 李麗蓉;崔妙玲;趙琳;;自我管理策略對(duì)慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生活質(zhì)量的影響[J];廣東醫(yī)學(xué);2013年09期
9 劉賢亮;譚景予;劉芳;張敏;姚立群;;自我管理教育對(duì)慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康影響的meta分析[J];中華護(hù)理雜志;2013年03期
10 陳曉依;劉峰;劉蘊(yùn)玲;陳紅方;韓月皎;何冰;;老年慢性病病人自我感受負(fù)擔(dān)與家庭支持和應(yīng)對(duì)方式的相關(guān)性研究[J];護(hù)理研究;2013年06期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 申華平;醫(yī)護(hù)合作式健康教育對(duì)COPD患者自我護(hù)理行為與生活質(zhì)量的影響[D];山西醫(yī)科大學(xué);2013年
2 楊鴻芳;血液透析患者的疾病不確定感與應(yīng)對(duì)方式和家庭支持的相關(guān)性研究[D];河北醫(yī)科大學(xué);2011年
3 劉麗萍;慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者系統(tǒng)化健康教育干預(yù)研究[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué);2008年
4 張紅;慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我護(hù)理行為狀況及影響因素的研究[D];中國(guó)協(xié)和醫(yī)科大學(xué);2007年
5 佘燕朝;血透患者自我管理水平對(duì)其健康狀況影響的研究[D];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué);2007年
，本文編號(hào)：2308927
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/linchuangyixuelunwen/2308927.html
最近更新
教材專著
