發(fā)布時間：2018-04-26 05:26

  本文選題：水資源配置指標(biāo) + 模糊層次分析法��； 參考：《水電能源科學(xué)》2015年01期

【摘要】：鑒于水資源配置是一個多指標(biāo)多層次的評價系統(tǒng),各個指標(biāo)權(quán)重值的計算結(jié)果直接影響著水資源配置的合理性。為了合理而精確地計算指標(biāo)權(quán)重值,利用模糊層次分析(FAHP)法與熵權(quán)法相融合的方法,既反映了專家的社會經(jīng)驗,又依據(jù)具體指標(biāo)數(shù)值進行分析計算,并根據(jù)兩種方法融合到對方的先后次序不同,分為主觀融入到客觀方法與客觀融入到主觀方法兩種綜合賦權(quán)方法,取其平均值得到最終權(quán)重值。實例分析表明,相較單一的指標(biāo)權(quán)重確定方法,綜合賦權(quán)法的計算結(jié)果更合理可靠,可為實際工程指標(biāo)權(quán)重計算提供借鑒。
[Abstract]:Since the allocation of water resources is a multi-index and multi-level evaluation system, the calculation results of the weight values of each index directly affect the rationality of water resources allocation. In order to calculate the index weight reasonably and accurately, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) method and the entropy weight method are combined to reflect the social experience of experts and to analyze and calculate the index value. According to the order of fusion of the two methods into the other side, it can be divided into two comprehensive weighting methods: subjective integration to objective method and objective method to subjective method, and the final weight value can be obtained by taking its average value. The example analysis shows that compared with the single index weight determination method, the comprehensive weighting method is more reasonable and reliable, and can be used as a reference for practical engineering index weight calculation.
【作者單位】： 河北工程大學(xué)水電學(xué)院;
【分類號】：TV213.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 匡樂紅;徐林榮;劉寶琛;;組合賦權(quán)法確定地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評價指標(biāo)權(quán)重[J];地下空間與工程學(xué)報;2006年06期

2 李海華;趙紅澤;李海強;;基于模糊層次分析法的煤礦工程評標(biāo)指標(biāo)權(quán)重確定[J];煤炭技術(shù);2013年02期

3 湯m，

本文編號：1804692