本文關(guān)鍵詞： 網(wǎng)頁快照 著作權(quán)侵權(quán) 系統(tǒng)緩存避風(fēng)港 默示許可 合理使用　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：“網(wǎng)頁快照”技術(shù)是在數(shù)字化背景下,搜索引擎行業(yè)為確保其技術(shù)優(yōu)勢、豐富其服務(wù)方式、提高互聯(lián)網(wǎng)用戶對網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息搜集的效率并且降低獲取信息成本的一項新技術(shù)�！熬W(wǎng)頁快照”的應(yīng)用提高了互聯(lián)網(wǎng)用戶獲取信息的效率、豐富了用戶利用信息的途徑,從技術(shù)的角度來說,對信息在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境傳播起到了促進(jìn)作用。但是從著作權(quán)法角度來說,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)海量的信息中有相當(dāng)一部分是屬于享有著作權(quán)的數(shù)字化作品,“網(wǎng)頁快照”技術(shù)在自動運行的過程中,直接侵害了這些數(shù)字化作品的著作權(quán)人的專有權(quán)利。對待“網(wǎng)頁快照”這一本該中立的新技術(shù)的合法性,在國內(nèi)外理論界和司法實務(wù)界都存在著很大的爭議。 在美國與網(wǎng)頁快照有關(guān)的判例"Field訴Google"案中,確立了“系統(tǒng)緩存避風(fēng)港”、“默示許可制度”和“合理使用制度”等網(wǎng)頁快照的主要侵權(quán)抗辯以及免責(zé)事由。本文討論之重點在于網(wǎng)頁快照是否符合這些抗辯和免責(zé)事由的適用條件,以及對于諸如“網(wǎng)頁快照”等新技術(shù)的對著作權(quán)制度的沖擊,我國著作權(quán)法應(yīng)當(dāng)如何完善以應(yīng)對挑戰(zhàn)。 本文一共分為引言和四個章節(jié)。 引言介紹了網(wǎng)頁快照產(chǎn)生的技術(shù)背景和中美關(guān)于“網(wǎng)頁快照”的一些司法判例,從不同的判決結(jié)果中引出本文所要討論的主題。 第一章從網(wǎng)頁快照的技術(shù)運行背景入手概括了網(wǎng)頁快照的特征和技術(shù)效果,同時通過與傳統(tǒng)搜索引擎服務(wù)的技術(shù)對比,明確了網(wǎng)頁快照在我國著作權(quán)法中的定性； 第二章在認(rèn)定網(wǎng)頁屬于著作權(quán)法保護(hù)的客體的前提下,認(rèn)為“網(wǎng)頁快照”技術(shù)中復(fù)制、存儲、傳播行為構(gòu)成對權(quán)利人復(fù)制權(quán)、信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)等著作權(quán)專有權(quán)利的侵害； 第三章探討“系統(tǒng)緩存避風(fēng)港”、“默示許可制度”以及“合理使用制度”等著作權(quán)的侵權(quán)抗辯以及免責(zé)事由在網(wǎng)頁快照中的適用,認(rèn)為快照不適用“系統(tǒng)緩存避風(fēng)港”、“默示許可制度”,可以分情況適用“合理使用制度”對其合法性進(jìn)行分析； 第四章提出網(wǎng)頁快照行為的處理原則與我國著作權(quán)法合理使用制度的完善。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下,應(yīng)將“三步檢驗標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”的法律地位確定為合理使用一般性判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),將其作為一個開放式的原則與著作權(quán)法第22條中合理使用行為的列舉式立法結(jié)合,在涉及諸如“網(wǎng)頁快照”等新技術(shù)合法性的判斷中,給法官預(yù)留靈活的自由裁量的空間,這樣才能更好平衡著作權(quán)人利益與信息技術(shù)發(fā)展和公共知識新技術(shù)傳播。
[Abstract]:"Web Page Snapshot" technology is in the digital background, the search engine industry to ensure its technical advantages, enrich its service. A new technology to improve the efficiency of Internet users to collect network information and reduce the cost of obtaining information. The application of "Web Page Snapshot" improves the efficiency of Internet users to obtain information. It enriches the ways for users to use information, and promotes the dissemination of information in the network environment from the technical point of view, but from the perspective of copyright law. A considerable part of the massive information on the Internet belongs to the digital works that enjoy copyright. "Web Page Snapshot" technology is in the process of automatic operation. Direct infringement of the exclusive rights of copyright owners of these digital works. Treatment of "Web Snapshots" The legitimacy of this new technology, which was supposed to be neutral, has been controversial both in theory and judicial practice at home and abroad. In the case of Field v. Google, the United States case relating to web page snapshots, a "safe haven for system caching" was established. "implied license system" and "reasonable use system" and other webpage snapshots of the main tort defences and exemptions. The focus of this discussion is whether the web snapshot meets the applicable conditions of these defences and exemptions. As well as the impact of new technologies such as "web snapshot" on the copyright system, how should China's copyright law be perfected to meet the challenge? This article is divided into introduction and four chapters. The introduction introduces the technical background of web page snapshot and some judicial precedents about "web page snapshot" in China and the United States, and draws the theme of this article from different judgment results. The first chapter summarizes the characteristics and technical effects of web snapshot from the background of the technology operation of web snapshot, and compares with the traditional search engine service technology at the same time. The definition of web page snapshot in the copyright law of our country is clarified. In the second chapter, on the premise that the web page belongs to the object protected by copyright law, the author thinks that the reproduction, storage and dissemination behavior in the technology of "web page snapshot" constitute the right to copy to the obligee. Infringement of exclusive rights of copyright, such as the right of information network dissemination; The third chapter discusses the application of copyright infringement defences such as "system cache safe haven", "implied license system" and "reasonable use system" in the web page snapshot. The author thinks that snapshot is not suitable for "system cache safe haven", "implied license system", and can be applied to "reasonable use system" to analyze its legitimacy. Chapter 4th puts forward the handling principle of web page snapshot and the perfection of the reasonable use system of copyright law in our country. The legal status of the "three-step test standard" should be determined as the general judgment standard of rational use, which should be combined as an open principle with the enumerative legislation of the rational use behavior in Article 22 of the copyright Law. In judgments involving the legitimacy of new technologies such as "web snapshots," judges are given room for flexible discretion. Only in this way can the interests of copyright owners be balanced with the development of information technology and the dissemination of new technology of public knowledge.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 呂炳斌;;數(shù)字時代版權(quán)保護(hù)理念的重構(gòu)——從以復(fù)制權(quán)為中心到以傳播權(quán)為中心[J];北方法學(xué);2007年06期

2 王遷;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中版權(quán)直接侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定[J];東方法學(xué);2009年02期

3 王遷;;搜索引擎提供“快照”服務(wù)的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題研究[J];東方法學(xué);2010年03期

4 胡開忠;許福忠;陳大林;;我國權(quán)利管理電子信息制度的立法設(shè)計[J];廈門大學(xué)法律評論;2005年02期

5 趙莉;質(zhì)疑網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)中“默示許可”的法律地位[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年12期

6 李秋容;個體利益與公共利益的博弈與平衡——關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的法理與實證分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年07期

7 朱理;;臨時復(fù)制是否屬于著作權(quán)法意義上的復(fù)制——以國際公約為核心的規(guī)范分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年01期

8 王遷;;發(fā)達(dá)國家網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)司法保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀與趨勢[J];法律適用;2009年12期

9 張今;陳倩婷;;論著作權(quán)默示許可使用的立法實踐[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年02期

10 王遷;;論版權(quán)“間接侵權(quán)”及其規(guī)則的法定化[J];法學(xué);2005年12期

，

本文編號：1445802