本文選題：楊武寨構(gòu)造帶 + 地震解釋�。� 參考：《中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：楊武寨構(gòu)造帶位于冀中凹陷饒陽凹陷南部,該區(qū)構(gòu)造復(fù)雜,具有進(jìn)一步勘探評價研究的必要。本論文研究了楊武寨構(gòu)造帶構(gòu)造演化及斷裂體系特征。論文針對老油田目前構(gòu)造研究存在的問題,充分利用已有資料,在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)之上,主要通過全區(qū)重點井地層對比、精細(xì)三維地震解釋、分析構(gòu)造演化史,對斷裂體系進(jìn)行了研究,進(jìn)一步理順了斷裂組合,總結(jié)出構(gòu)造特征,為指導(dǎo)油田開發(fā)提供了基礎(chǔ)。完成研究區(qū)內(nèi)重點井地層劃分對比,確定區(qū)域內(nèi)兩套一級標(biāo)志層(Es1下底W型低阻泥巖段和Es3頂部的特殊巖性段),兩個二級標(biāo)志層(Es2頂“細(xì)脖子”泥巖段和Es3上高阻基值夾刺刀狀的塊狀高阻特殊巖性段)及多個輔助標(biāo)志層。通過多工區(qū)地震資料拼接,使用多工區(qū)地震資料分析研究區(qū)的區(qū)域構(gòu)造背景和構(gòu)造關(guān)系,分析構(gòu)造形成機(jī)理:本研究區(qū)位于饒陽凹陷東南部,處于構(gòu)造轉(zhuǎn)換帶,受周邊三個不同應(yīng)力方向的凸起所影響。東部的獻(xiàn)縣凸起地層北抬南降;西部的高陽深澤低凸起地層南抬北降;南部的新河凸起地層?xùn)|抬西降;獻(xiàn)縣、高陽深澤兩大凸起塊體的拆離運(yùn)動是饒南凹陷大型拆離滑覆構(gòu)造形成的基本因素,本研究區(qū)屬饒南凹陷大型拆離滑覆構(gòu)造的南部;區(qū)內(nèi)古近系、新近系的不同構(gòu)造形跡是兩大塊體在第三紀(jì)時期拆離過程中的不同構(gòu)造活動的產(chǎn)物。結(jié)合構(gòu)造形成機(jī)理及斷裂力學(xué)研究,使用多種地震屬性對全區(qū)進(jìn)行了精細(xì)三維地震解釋,研究區(qū)內(nèi)主要斷層為獻(xiàn)縣斷層、孫虎—楊武寨斷層、留楚—皇甫村斷層,剖面上主要發(fā)育“y”字型、“馬尾狀”、斷階型斷層組合。平面上楊武寨地區(qū)東西向分異明顯,可劃分為三個構(gòu)造區(qū)帶,即楊武寨西部單斜帶(北抬南傾),楊武寨中央背斜和楊武寨東洼槽東陡帶。南北向又可劃分為三個局部構(gòu)造區(qū):楊武寨主體背斜區(qū)、楊武寨北斷鼻構(gòu)造區(qū)、楊武寨南斷鼻構(gòu)造區(qū)。從斷層活動的時序性分析,孫虎—楊武寨構(gòu)造帶的斷裂發(fā)育具有多期性,共有三個期次的斷裂發(fā)育。斷層的發(fā)育期次與該區(qū)的構(gòu)造運(yùn)動密切相關(guān)。北部的楊武寨北斷鼻構(gòu)造區(qū)即為三期構(gòu)造疊置區(qū),斷裂發(fā)育,構(gòu)造破碎,為油氣有利聚集區(qū)。
[Abstract]:Yangwuzhai structural belt is located in the south of Raoyang Sag, Jizhong Sag. The structural evolution and fault system characteristics of Yangwuzhai tectonic belt are studied in this paper. Aiming at the problems existing in the current structural research of the old oil fields, the paper makes full use of the existing data and, on the basis of previous studies, mainly analyzes the history of structural evolution by means of stratigraphic correlation of key wells in the whole area, fine three-dimensional seismic interpretation, and analysis of structural evolution history. The fault system is studied, the fault assemblage is further straightened out, and the structural characteristics are summed up, which provides the basis for guiding oil field development. Complete the stratigraphic division and correlation of key wells in the study area, Two sets of first-grade marker layers (the W-type low-resistivity mudstone segment at the bottom of Es1 and the special lithologic section at the top of Es3), two second-order marker layers (the "fine neck" mudstone section of Es2 and the bayonet shape of high resistivity base value on Es3) are determined. Segment) and multiple auxiliary marking layers. Based on the combination of seismic data in multi-work area, the authors analyze the regional tectonic background and tectonic relationship of the study area by using seismic data of multi-work area, and analyze the formation mechanism of the structure: the study area is located in the southeast of Raoyang sag, and is located in the structural transition zone. Affected by three different stress directions around the bulge. Xianxian uplift strata in the east carry south down; Gaoyang Shenze low uplift strata in the west lift north to the north; Xinhe uplift strata in the south lift west to the east; Xien County, The detachment movement of the two major uplift blocks in Shenze, Gaoyang, is the basic factor for the formation of large-scale detachment and slip structures in the Raonan Sag. The study area belongs to the southern part of the large-scale detachment and slip structure in the Raonan Sag and the Paleogene system in the area. The different tectonic traces of the Neogene are the product of different tectonic activities in the process of separation of the two blocks during the Tertiary period. Combined with the study of structural formation mechanism and fracture mechanics, the fine 3D seismic interpretation of the whole area is carried out by using various seismic attributes. The main faults in the study area are Xianxian fault, Sunhu-Yangwuzhai fault, Liuchu-Huangfu fault. There are mainly y-shaped, equine-shaped and faulted fault assemblages in the section. The east-west differentiation of Yangwuzhai area is obvious on the plane, which can be divided into three structural zones, namely, the western Yangwuzhai monocline (north to south tilting), the Yangwuzhai central anticline and the eastern steep belt of Yangwuzhai Dongwa trough. The south-north direction can be divided into three local tectonic areas: the main anticline in Yangwuzhai, the north fault nose structure in Yangwuzhai, and the south fault nose in Yangwuzhai. The fault development of Sunhu-Yangwuzhai tectonic belt is multi-period, and there are three stages of fault development. The development times of faults are closely related to the tectonic movement in this area. The north Yangwuzhai North faulted nose structure area is the third stage structure superposition area, the fault develops, the structure is broken, it is the favorable oil and gas accumulation area.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：P618.13;P548

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 IanG.Main ,孟凡林;散射衰減和斷裂體系的分形[J];地球物理學(xué)進(jìn)展;1990年03期

2 潘杰;張亞芹;;川西合興場斷裂體系分析[J];地下水;2014年02期

3 王婧韞,宋慧利,王正斌,劉淑,金振華;東濮凹陷斷裂體系及其意義[J];石油地球物理勘探;2004年06期

4 邱燕,曾維軍,李唐根;南海中、南部斷裂體系及其構(gòu)造意義[J];大地構(gòu)造與成礦學(xué);2005年02期

5 劉曉冬,徐景禎,王新峰;斷裂體系多重分形譜特征及其應(yīng)用[J];石油地球物理勘探;1999年03期

6 吳智平;薛雁;顏世永;宿雯;王昕;徐長貴;周心懷;;渤海海域渤東地區(qū)斷裂體系與盆地結(jié)構(gòu)[J];高校地質(zhì)學(xué)報;2013年03期

7 高永進(jìn);;東營凹陷“紅層”層系斷裂體系發(fā)育特征[J];斷塊油氣田;2011年01期

8 А.П.Лозовой;田書文;;應(yīng)用前寒武紀(jì)斷裂體系預(yù)測內(nèi)生礦化作用的新方法[J];國外前寒武紀(jì)地質(zhì);1989年02期

9 K．F．吉亞勃金,戚建中;地殼斷裂體系及其在金屬礦床預(yù)測中的應(yīng)用[J];火山地質(zhì)與礦產(chǎn);1997年01期

10 盧新衛(wèi),馬東升;湘中斷裂體系分維與銻礦分布[J];地質(zhì)論評;1998年05期

相關(guān)會議論文 前4條

1 曾佐勛;劉立林;;典型斷裂體系新脆漆實驗研究[A];第五屆全國構(gòu)造物理、第三屆全國高溫高壓學(xué)術(shù)討論會論文摘要[C];1992年

2 高慶華;;地球自轉(zhuǎn)與全球斷裂體系[A];中國地質(zhì)科學(xué)院562綜合大隊文集（6）[C];1987年

3 單家增;張占文;陳紹生;孫紅軍;肖乾華;;遼河盆地東部凹陷斷裂體系成因機(jī)制:來自構(gòu)造物理模擬實驗的新認(rèn)識[A];第三屆全國沉積學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編[C];2004年

4 王忠蕾;張訓(xùn)華;許淑梅;;南海海盆斷裂體系特征研究進(jìn)展[A];中國地球物理·2009[C];2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李其瑞;楊武寨構(gòu)造帶構(gòu)造演化及斷裂體系特征研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京);2015年

2 魏雄輝;東濮凹陷馬廠地區(qū)變換帶和斷裂體系研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）;2009年

，

本文編號：2063819