青島世園會(huì)園區(qū)建設(shè)項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究
[Abstract]:Qingdao Expo 2014 is the highest standard and the most influential international event after Qingdao successfully held 20 () 8-year Olympic sailing events. It is the first high-level horticultural expo hosted by Qingdao City. The construction project of the Expo Park is a complex project with large investment, wide international influence and long construction cycle. It faces risks from many aspects in the course of construction and operation. How to select the right method to identify and evaluate these risks and put forward the corresponding preventive measures will directly affect the exhibition effect of the Expo and also affect the image of the country and Qingdao opening to the outside world. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the risk assessment of Qingdao World Garden Park construction project in this paper. This paper takes the risk assessment of Qingdao World Garden Park construction project as the main research content. Firstly, it introduces the domestic and foreign research status of the project risk assessment and the relevant theoretical basis of the construction project of the World Garden Expo Park. Including the characteristics of the Expo Park project, the concept of project risk assessment, characteristics and main methods; Then the third part of the paper introduces the details of the project and risk assessment of Qingdao World Garden Expo Park, including the external conditions of the project, the construction scale, the current situation of Qingdao tourism market development and prediction; The fourth part, based on the principle and purpose of risk identification, uses multiple methods to identify the risk of the project, and finally determines the external condition risk, market risk and capital risk. Project management risk and social risk five first-level risks and several secondary risks; The fifth part first establishes the risk evaluation index system of Qingdao World Garden Park construction project according to the conclusion of the above part, then selects the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the analytic hierarchy process and the expert scoring method to quantify these risk indicators and give weight to them. Finally, the comprehensive evaluation of the project risk is carried out, and the conclusion of the risk evaluation is that the overall probability of general risk and lower risk of Qingdao Expo construction project is high, the project construction is feasible, the market risk and capital risk are large. In this part, the corresponding preventive measures for each kind of risk are put forward. The last part of this paper summarizes the conclusions of this paper, and points out the shortcomings of the research and the direction of further research in the future. In this paper, the risk evaluation index system and risk evaluation model of the project are established through the risk evaluation of the Expo Park Project, and it is applied to the infrastructure construction (adjustment) project of the Qingdao World Garden Expo Park, and the risk evaluation index system and the risk evaluation model of the project are established in this paper. It provides some guidance for the risk prevention of the project.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中國海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:F299.23;TU71
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李海凌,劉克劍,李芊;模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)在工程項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用研究[J];西華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2005年06期
2 張金牡;;基于支持向量機(jī)的水利工程項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)[J];西部探礦工程;2008年06期
3 張寧;陶慶;;基于多級(jí)模糊綜合法的工程項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年S1期
4 苗長潤,安雅琴,陳敬武;投資項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)[J];河北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期
5 楊羽;;基于Fuzzy-AHP方法的建筑項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)[J];科技成果縱橫;2011年01期
6 許承元;;基于FUZZY-AHP的建設(shè)項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];山西建筑;2009年35期
7 謝志;;建筑企業(yè)的項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)[J];硅谷;2011年02期
8 唐文彬;張飛漣;李晶晶;;基于模糊網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析法的城際鐵路建設(shè)項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];鐵道科學(xué)與工程學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期
9 王玲;劉建林;朱記偉;;基于AHP-MF模型的國際水電EPC項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];工程管理學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期
10 鄭萬勇;薛飛;李亞光;;建設(shè)項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];科技創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)報(bào);2009年28期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條
1 姜晨光;嚴(yán)立明;張華強(qiáng);任忠慧;張輝;;基于模糊理論的房地產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[A];自主創(chuàng)新與持續(xù)增長第十一屆中國科協(xié)年會(huì)論文集(2)[C];2009年
2 王玲;劉建林;朱記偉;;基于AHP-MF模型的國際水電EPC項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[A];陜西省水力發(fā)電工程學(xué)會(huì)第三屆青年優(yōu)秀科技論文集[C];2013年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 宣亞雷;二氧化碳捕獲與封存技術(shù)應(yīng)用項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2013年
2 王巍;基于統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)習(xí)理論的項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)與預(yù)測(cè)研究[D];天津大學(xué);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 焦力;青島世園會(huì)園區(qū)建設(shè)項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2013年
2 陳芳;建筑工程項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];山東科技大學(xué);2009年
3 郝春暉;先進(jìn)制造系統(tǒng)項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];安徽工程大學(xué);2010年
4 趙益民;石油工程項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)模型設(shè)計(jì)及系統(tǒng)實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];中國石油大學(xué);2008年
5 李志良;火電廠汽輪機(jī)通流部分改造項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];華北電力大學(xué)(河北);2010年
6 張守忠;航空項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)技術(shù)研究[D];西北工業(yè)大學(xué);2006年
7 劉文娟;國際石油合作項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國石油大學(xué);2007年
8 丁琨;基于灰色分析法的房地產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)[D];石家莊經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;2015年
9 陳麗云;呼倫貝爾燃煤空冷機(jī)組擴(kuò)建項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];華北電力大學(xué)(河北);2009年
10 余建偉;合作技術(shù)創(chuàng)新項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中南大學(xué);2007年
,本文編號(hào):2467641
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/kejilunwen/sgjslw/2467641.html