發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-09 07:14

【摘要】：自2008年我國的“綠色建筑評價(jià)標(biāo)識”工作啟動后，綠色建筑在國內(nèi)得到了大力推行，但仍舊存在標(biāo)識評審過程繁冗、易受人為主觀影響、評定出的星級綠色建筑缺乏示范性與整體生態(tài)性考量等諸多問題。進(jìn)而導(dǎo)致評定結(jié)果缺乏科學(xué)性，難以為其他項(xiàng)目提供示范和借鑒價(jià)值，阻礙了綠色建筑的發(fā)展�？梢姡鉀Q當(dāng)前綠色建筑評審中的這些問題，對于突破綠色建筑的發(fā)展桎梏，推動我國建筑業(yè)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展具有十分重要的意義。 鑒于此，研究將標(biāo)桿管理這一較為有效、節(jié)約的管理方法引入到綠色建筑領(lǐng)域，，提出通過樹立具有示范意義的綠色建筑標(biāo)桿項(xiàng)目，為設(shè)計(jì)和建設(shè)單位提高綠色建筑設(shè)計(jì)和管理水平提供一種新思路。研究從生態(tài)視角出發(fā)，采用生態(tài)足跡分析法設(shè)計(jì)綠色建筑生態(tài)指標(biāo)體系，并以此作為評價(jià)綠色建筑與評定標(biāo)桿項(xiàng)目的依據(jù)。通過準(zhǔn)確定量綠色建筑的生態(tài)價(jià)值，為評價(jià)建筑物與生態(tài)環(huán)境是否和諧共處提供了科學(xué)、直觀的判斷依據(jù)，從而彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)行評價(jià)體系缺乏整體生態(tài)考量的缺陷。在探索并規(guī)范綠色建筑標(biāo)桿評定流程的基礎(chǔ)上，分別設(shè)計(jì)了標(biāo)桿篩選與標(biāo)桿評選兩個(gè)階段。同時(shí)運(yùn)用個(gè)性優(yōu)勢識別法辨析各個(gè)項(xiàng)目的特征及優(yōu)勢，通過構(gòu)建標(biāo)桿篩選模型來客觀評價(jià)和確定綠色建筑，通過構(gòu)建標(biāo)桿評選模型來樹立合適的標(biāo)桿項(xiàng)目。最后結(jié)合實(shí)例分析，驗(yàn)證模型的科學(xué)性與可行性。 研究結(jié)果表明，在識別項(xiàng)目特征的基礎(chǔ)上樹立綠色建筑標(biāo)桿，理論可行、過程嚴(yán)密、結(jié)果可信，有助于不同項(xiàng)目主動地接受標(biāo)桿和積極地展開學(xué)習(xí)。研究通過構(gòu)建標(biāo)桿篩選與評選模型形成的一套綠色建筑的標(biāo)桿評定方法，簡化了綠色建筑星級標(biāo)識項(xiàng)目的評審工作，克服了評審結(jié)果缺乏示范性與生態(tài)性考量、易受主觀影響等缺陷，為設(shè)計(jì)單位和建設(shè)單位提供了可信、可行的學(xué)習(xí)榜樣。
[Abstract]:Since the work of "green building evaluation marking" was started in China in 2008, green building has been vigorously promoted in China, but there is still a cumbersome process of marking evaluation, which is vulnerable to subjective influence. The evaluation of star-rated green buildings lacks exemplary and overall ecological considerations and many other issues. It is difficult to provide demonstration and reference value for other projects, which hinders the development of green building. Therefore, it is of great significance to solve these problems in the current evaluation of green buildings, to break through the shackles of the development of green buildings and to promote the sustainable development of our country's construction industry. In view of this, the research introduces the effective and economical management method of benchmarking to the field of green building, and puts forward that the project of green building benchmarking with demonstration significance should be set up. It provides a new idea for the design and construction units to improve the level of green building design and management. From the perspective of ecology, the ecological index system of green building is designed by using ecological footprint analysis method, which is used as the basis for evaluating green building and evaluating benchmarking project. By accurately quantifying the ecological value of green buildings, this paper provides a scientific and intuitive basis for evaluating the harmonious coexistence of buildings and ecological environment, so as to make up for the lack of overall ecological considerations in the current evaluation system. On the basis of exploring and standardizing the assessment process of green building benchmarking, two stages of benchmarking selection and benchmarking selection are designed. At the same time, individual advantage recognition method is used to distinguish the characteristics and advantages of each project. Through the construction of benchmarking selection model to objectively evaluate and determine the green building, through the construction of benchmarking model to establish a suitable benchmarking project. Finally, combined with an example analysis, verify the scientific and feasibility of the model. The results show that establishing green building benchmarking on the basis of identifying project characteristics is feasible in theory, rigorous in process and credible in results, which is helpful for different projects to actively accept the benchmarking and study actively. In this paper, a set of benchmarking evaluation methods for green buildings formed by the model of benchmarking selection and selection is constructed, which simplifies the evaluation of star-mark projects in green buildings, and overcomes the lack of exemplary and ecological considerations in the evaluation results. Vulnerable to subjective influence and other defects, for the design and construction units to provide a credible, feasible example.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU201.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳麗萍;楊忠直;;中國生態(tài)赤字核算與分析[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2006年04期

2 黃喜兵;黃慶;黃云德;;基于數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析的代建單位評選方法[J];重慶交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2009年04期

3 賈建鋒;趙希男;朱珠;王艷梅;;基于個(gè)性優(yōu)勢識別的制造業(yè)管理勝任特征代理評價(jià)[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年10期

4 關(guān)志民;董恩伏;張莉莉;;基于目標(biāo)規(guī)劃的標(biāo)桿自然選擇方法及其應(yīng)用[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2011年11期

5 趙玉紅;敬久旺;魏學(xué)紅;;基于生態(tài)足跡的藏北那曲縣草地生態(tài)承載力分析[J];貴州農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2011年09期

6 劉敬嚴(yán);;超效率DEA模型及靈敏度分析在標(biāo)桿管理中的應(yīng)用[J];工業(yè)工程;2008年04期

7 趙希男;王艷梅;靖可;;基于個(gè)性優(yōu)勢特征識別的區(qū)域科技發(fā)展模式分析方法及應(yīng)用[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

8 仇保興;;我國綠色建筑發(fā)展和建筑節(jié)能的形勢與任務(wù)[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2012年05期

9 張建坤;王朝陽;;基于生態(tài)足跡的建設(shè)項(xiàng)目評價(jià)與實(shí)證分析[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2010年12期

10 王靈梅,張金屯;生態(tài)學(xué)理論在生態(tài)工業(yè)發(fā)展中的應(yīng)用[J];環(huán)境保護(hù);2003年07期

本文編號：2454958