本文選題：國家大劇院　切入點(diǎn)：招投標(biāo)　出處：《北京工業(yè)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目前，招投標(biāo)因?yàn)榭梢杂行У呐渲煤瞳@取所需的商品、工程、服務(wù)等資源，已經(jīng)成為國際上最為普遍的商品交易方式。在中國，招投標(biāo)制度在80年代才開始引入的，2000年頒布的《中華人民共和國招標(biāo)投標(biāo)法》是國內(nèi)最重要的關(guān)于招投標(biāo)的法律文件。劇院項(xiàng)目從工程項(xiàng)目初期建設(shè)到所有重要設(shè)備的采購以及其他相關(guān)業(yè)務(wù)的招投標(biāo)工作都可以依據(jù)《招標(biāo)投標(biāo)法》進(jìn)行。眾所周知，國家大劇院是一項(xiàng)著名的工程項(xiàng)目，其擴(kuò)聲系統(tǒng)招投標(biāo)的好壞將直接影響國家大劇院的建設(shè)水平，影響國際大劇院藝術(shù)水平的高低，因此，對(duì)國家大劇院招投標(biāo)工作的評(píng)價(jià)具有非常重要的意義。評(píng)價(jià)工作是否科學(xué)合理，將直接影響國家大劇院建設(shè)工作的成功與失敗，科學(xué)合理的評(píng)價(jià)體系不僅能保證國家大劇院項(xiàng)目采購到最好的擴(kuò)聲系統(tǒng)，還能反映政府采購的公開、公平、公正性，為凈化招投標(biāo)市場豎立一支標(biāo)桿。但是，目前缺乏一個(gè)科學(xué)合理的招投標(biāo)評(píng)價(jià)方法。因此，探討制定一個(gè)科學(xué)合理的招投標(biāo)評(píng)標(biāo)方法是當(dāng)前招投標(biāo)工作的關(guān)鍵。 本文首先對(duì)擴(kuò)聲系統(tǒng)招投標(biāo)評(píng)價(jià)方法進(jìn)行了總結(jié)與比較，總結(jié)歸納出各種方法的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)。根據(jù)國家大劇院擴(kuò)聲系統(tǒng)招投標(biāo)工作的特點(diǎn)，從資格指標(biāo)、技術(shù)指標(biāo)、商務(wù)指標(biāo)、價(jià)格指標(biāo)4個(gè)層面構(gòu)建出國家大劇院擴(kuò)聲系統(tǒng)的評(píng)標(biāo)指標(biāo)體系。通過國家大劇院擴(kuò)聲系統(tǒng)招投標(biāo)工作這個(gè)實(shí)例，對(duì)綜合評(píng)分法和層次分析法進(jìn)行詳述，，通過對(duì)比兩種方法，優(yōu)化選擇出一種合適的評(píng)標(biāo)方法。通過優(yōu)化選擇評(píng)價(jià)方法，使評(píng)標(biāo)工作更加科學(xué)公正，評(píng)標(biāo)水平有所提高，同時(shí)提出了一些完善國家大劇院擴(kuò)聲系統(tǒng)招投標(biāo)中評(píng)標(biāo)方法的建議與對(duì)策，為今后大型擴(kuò)聲系統(tǒng)項(xiàng)目的招標(biāo)工作提供一定的借鑒。
[Abstract]:At present, bidding and bidding has become the most common commodity trading method in the world because it can effectively allocate and acquire needed commodities, engineering, services and other resources. In China, The bidding system was introduced in 80s. The Law of the people's Republic of China on bidding and bidding, promulgated on 2000, is the most important legal document on bidding and bidding in China. The procurement of equipment and the bidding for other related services may be carried out in accordance with the Law on tendering and bidding. The National Grand Theater is a famous engineering project. The bidding and bidding of its sound reinforcement system will directly affect the construction level of the National Grand Theater and the art level of the International Grand Theater. It is of great significance to evaluate the bidding work of the National Grand Theater. Whether the evaluation work is scientific and reasonable will directly affect the success and failure of the construction of the National Grand Theater. A scientific and reasonable evaluation system can not only guarantee the best sound reinforcement system for the National Grand Theater project, but also reflect the openness, fairness and fairness of government procurement, and set up a benchmark for purifying the bidding market. At present, there is a lack of a scientific and reasonable evaluation method of bidding and bidding. Therefore, it is the key of the present bidding work to explore a scientific and reasonable method of bidding evaluation. Firstly, this paper summarizes and compares the evaluation methods of the sound reinforcement system and summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the various methods. According to the characteristics of the bidding work of the sound reinforcement system of the National Grand Theater, the qualification index, the technical index and the commercial index are introduced. The bid evaluation index system of the sound reinforcement system of the National Grand Theater is constructed from four aspects of the price index. Through the example of the bidding work of the sound reinforcement system of the National Grand Theater, the comprehensive scoring method and the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are described in detail, and the two methods are compared. Optimize the selection of a suitable bid evaluation method. By optimizing the selection of evaluation methods, the evaluation work will be more scientific and fair, and the level of bid evaluation will be improved. At the same time, some suggestions and countermeasures are put forward to perfect the bidding method of the sound reinforcement system of the National Grand Theater, which will provide some reference for the bidding work of the large-scale sound reinforcement system project in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：TU723.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 向鵬成;任宏;鐘韻;馮迎賓;;信息不對(duì)稱理論的工程項(xiàng)目主體行為博弈分析[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2007年10期

2 鄧峰;物資招標(biāo)采購的管理與實(shí)踐[J];鋼管;2003年05期

3 張清梅;用層次分析法優(yōu)選基建設(shè)備[J];湖北工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

4 莊鎖法;基于層次分析法的綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型[J];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2000年04期

5 付建華;;設(shè)備采購招標(biāo)綜合記分評(píng)標(biāo)方法探討[J];機(jī)電信息;2008年14期

6 段愛玲;王高平;李永剛;;層次分析法在設(shè)備采購評(píng)標(biāo)中的應(yīng)用[J];計(jì)算機(jī)與信息技術(shù);2005年12期

7 趙霖平,周云,錢葉鈞;試析工程招投標(biāo)過程中承包商之間的合謀[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年02期

8 童紅峰;;設(shè)備招標(biāo)中量化評(píng)標(biāo)模型的建立[J];中國招標(biāo);2001年Z3期

9 汪江洪;李嘉;;機(jī)電產(chǎn)品國際招標(biāo)采購中綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法的應(yīng)用[J];中國招標(biāo);2006年32期

10 柴光明;焦柚芳;;工程設(shè)備招標(biāo)評(píng)標(biāo)辦法初探[J];中國招標(biāo);2007年42期

本文編號(hào)：1594767