不同雨強(qiáng)、坡度對(duì)秸稈覆蓋保持水土效果的影響
[Abstract]:The effects of four designed rainfall intensities (33, 54, 94125 mm / h) and three designed slopes (5 擄, 10 擄, 25 擄) on the initial yield time, water retention rate and sediment retention rate of purple soil slope under mulching conditions were studied using artificial simulated rainfall experiments in laboratory. The results show that the initial runoff production time under the condition of mulching has a certain lag effect compared with the bare soil, and the lag time of the initial runoff production decreases with the increase of slope and rain intensity. When the slope increases to 25 擄and the rain intensity is above 94mm/h, the lag time tends to stabilize gradually and fluctuates in the range of 1.61~2.84min. Rain intensity is an important factor affecting soil and water conservation by straw mulching, which is negatively correlated with water retention rate and sediment retention rate at 0.01 level, and can be described by parabola under different slope conditions. Under different slope conditions, the water retention rate of mulching decreased to 14.5% with the increase of rain intensity, while the sand retention rate only decreased to 92.25%, which was more obvious than that of mulching. Under the condition of mulching, the contribution rate of slope to runoff yield and sediment yield was more than 50%, and the slope had a great effect on soil and water conservation by straw mulching. The contribution rate of slope to slope erosion decreases with the increase of rain intensity under both bare land and cover conditions, and under the same rainfall intensity, the contribution rate of slope to slope erosion is larger than that of bare land under the same rainfall intensity, and the contribution rate of slope to slope erosion is higher than that of bare land under the same rainfall intensity. The difference was obvious in heavy rain (94mm/h and 125mm/h).
【作者單位】: 四川農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)林學(xué)院;
【基金】:國家“十二五”科技支撐計(jì)劃重大項(xiàng)目“長(zhǎng)江上游低山丘陵區(qū)生態(tài)綜合整治技術(shù)與示范”(2011BAC09B05) 四川省高校水土保持與荒漠化防治重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室建設(shè)項(xiàng)目 四川農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)研究生社會(huì)實(shí)踐和科技服務(wù)團(tuán)項(xiàng)目
【分類號(hào)】:S157.1
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 林超文;龐良玉;羅春燕;陳一兵;黃晶晶;涂仕華;張鴻;;平衡施肥及雨強(qiáng)對(duì)紫色土養(yǎng)分流失的影響[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2009年10期
2 蔡雄飛;王濟(jì);雷麗;郝萌萌;余躍;;不同雨強(qiáng)對(duì)我國西南喀斯特山區(qū)土壤侵蝕影響的模擬研究[J];水土保持學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期
3 陳玲;劉德富;宋林旭;崔玉潔;張革;;不同雨強(qiáng)下黃棕壤坡耕地徑流養(yǎng)分輸出機(jī)制研究[J];環(huán)境科學(xué);2013年06期
4 林超文;龐良玉;陳一兵;涂仕華;李浩;;不同耕作方式和雨強(qiáng)對(duì)紫色土坡耕地降雨有效性的影響[J];生態(tài)環(huán)境;2008年03期
5 江淼華;黃榮珍;謝錦升;王維明;;不同雨強(qiáng)對(duì)裸露坡地水土流失的影響研究[J];亞熱帶資源與環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期
6 梁新強(qiáng);陳英旭;李華;田光明;俞巧鋼;;雨強(qiáng)及施肥降雨間隔對(duì)油菜田氮素徑流流失的影響[J];水土保持學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期
7 王志勇;李曉宇;錢星平;;基于臨界雨強(qiáng)方法的孤山川水土保持效益評(píng)估[J];人民黃河;2012年06期
8 崔普偉;蔡強(qiáng)國;張利超;鄭明國;;基于EXCEL 2003時(shí)段雨強(qiáng)的快速計(jì)算[J];中國水土保持;2010年06期
9 張佳琪;王紅;張瑞芳;周大邁;張愛軍;;雨強(qiáng)對(duì)片麻巖坡面徑流養(yǎng)分流失規(guī)律的影響[J];水土保持學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期
10 張旭f;薛天柱;馬燦;魏國孝;閆業(yè)慶;胡雅杰;;雨強(qiáng)和植被覆蓋度對(duì)典型坡面產(chǎn)流產(chǎn)沙的影響[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2012年06期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條
1 鄭子成;吳發(fā)啟;何淑勤;王昌全;李廷軒;夏建國;張錫洲;;坡耕地地表糙度及其作用研究(摘要)[A];中國地壤學(xué)會(huì)第十次全國會(huì)員代表大會(huì)暨第五屆海峽兩岸土壤肥料學(xué)術(shù)交流研討會(huì)文集(面向農(nóng)業(yè)與環(huán)境的土壤科學(xué)專題篇)[C];2004年
2 李建生;何增化;;不同雨強(qiáng)下紅壤坡地徑流及土壤侵蝕研究——以廣東惠州抽水蓄能電站水土保持監(jiān)測(cè)為例[A];中國南方十三。ㄊ、區(qū))水電學(xué)會(huì)聯(lián)絡(luò)會(huì)暨學(xué)術(shù)交流研討會(huì)論文集[C];2006年
,本文編號(hào):2443863
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/kejilunwen/nykj/2443863.html