本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于能值分析的定西市農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)可持續(xù)發(fā)展評(píng)價(jià)　出處：《甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 定西市 農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng) 能值分析 可持續(xù)發(fā)展指數(shù)

【摘要】：定西市位于甘肅省中部,地貌型態(tài)復(fù)雜、氣候干旱少雨,水資源嚴(yán)重缺乏,水土流失嚴(yán)重,自然災(zāi)害頻繁,是全國(guó)典型的生態(tài)脆弱區(qū)。農(nóng)業(yè)特別是種植業(yè)是定西市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ),農(nóng)業(yè)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展直接關(guān)系到該地區(qū)生態(tài)環(huán)境的安危。農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)作為農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)的基礎(chǔ),資源的高效利用、種植業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的合理高產(chǎn)決定著農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)的穩(wěn)定發(fā)展。因而定量評(píng)價(jià)定西市農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)具有重要價(jià)值。本文運(yùn)用能值分析理論,對(duì)定西市農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的能值投入產(chǎn)出結(jié)構(gòu)、資源利用效率和可持續(xù)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r進(jìn)行分析和評(píng)價(jià),主要結(jié)論如下:(1)2001-2014年,定西市農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)總的能值投入呈逐年增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì),由2001年的3.67×1021sej增長(zhǎng)到2014年的4.61×1021sej,增幅為25.78%。環(huán)境資源貢獻(xiàn)率較大且呈下降趨勢(shì)。總的能值投入以輔助能為主,不可更新的工業(yè)輔助能投入中,化肥的能值投入最大,平均比重高達(dá)91.77%;可更新的有機(jī)能投入中,人力和畜力投入較大,平均比重分別為63.82%和23.14%,其中畜力的能值投入在逐年減少。系統(tǒng)能值投入密度和能值投入率均呈增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì)。研究表明,定西市農(nóng)田生產(chǎn)中經(jīng)濟(jì)投入所占比重越來(lái)越大,機(jī)械化程度有所增加,對(duì)自然環(huán)境的依賴程度越來(lái)越低,系統(tǒng)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展能力在不斷下降�？臻g上,各縣(區(qū))農(nóng)田生態(tài)系能值投入結(jié)構(gòu)差異顯著,臨洮縣和安定區(qū)等社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展較好的縣(區(qū))能值投入具有明顯優(yōu)勢(shì)。(2)2001-2014年,定西市農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)總的能值產(chǎn)出整體呈增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì),由2001年的1.55×1021sej增長(zhǎng)到2014年的2.58×1021sej,增幅為68.09%。系統(tǒng)能值產(chǎn)出密度呈增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì),增幅為66.96%。主要能值產(chǎn)出作物有玉米、薯類、藥材、小麥、油料和豆類。研究期間,玉米、薯類、藥材的能值產(chǎn)出呈增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì),其中玉米增加了8.38倍;小麥、油料、豆類的能值產(chǎn)出呈下降趨勢(shì);甜菜、水果、蔬菜、瓜類的能值產(chǎn)出比重較小。種植業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)均衡度指數(shù)基本保持穩(wěn)定,平均值為1.72。研究表明,定西市農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)生產(chǎn)力水平在逐年提高�？臻g上,各縣(區(qū))農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)能值產(chǎn)出密度差異顯著,漳縣和岷縣較高,生產(chǎn)力水平相對(duì)較好;其它縣(區(qū))較低,生產(chǎn)力水平相對(duì)較低。各縣(區(qū))在不同種植作物上形成了各自的規(guī)模效率優(yōu)勢(shì)。(3)2001-2014年,定西市農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)資源利用效率較低,凈能值產(chǎn)出率平均值為0.53,能值總產(chǎn)出遠(yuǎn)低于輔助能能值投入,系統(tǒng)一直處于“虧損”狀態(tài),農(nóng)產(chǎn)品在市場(chǎng)上沒(méi)有競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力�？臻g上,各縣(區(qū))凈能值產(chǎn)出率差異顯著,漳縣最高為1.03大于1,其它縣(區(qū))均小于1。說(shuō)明漳縣能值產(chǎn)出超過(guò)了輔助能投入,資源利用效率較高;其它縣(區(qū))資源利用效率較低,呈高投入低產(chǎn)出的生產(chǎn)狀況。研究表明,灌溉水、有機(jī)肥、化肥和農(nóng)業(yè)機(jī)械對(duì)系統(tǒng)的能值產(chǎn)出具有顯著影響,環(huán)境資源和畜力呈負(fù)相關(guān)影響,說(shuō)明定西市土地貧瘠,需要不斷從系統(tǒng)外補(bǔ)充能量,在未來(lái)的農(nóng)田生產(chǎn)中應(yīng)加大有機(jī)肥和農(nóng)業(yè)機(jī)械化投入,盡可能創(chuàng)造有利的灌溉條件對(duì)農(nóng)田進(jìn)行灌溉。(4)2001-2014年,定西市農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)可持續(xù)發(fā)展指數(shù)總體呈下降趨勢(shì),研究末期有所回升,但均小于1,屬消費(fèi)型生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng),可持續(xù)發(fā)展力較弱。環(huán)境負(fù)載率指數(shù)均小于3,環(huán)境壓力較小,但持續(xù)增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì)表明,環(huán)境壓力將會(huì)不斷增大�？臻g上,各縣(區(qū))系統(tǒng)可持續(xù)發(fā)展指數(shù)差異明顯,漳縣和岷縣大于1,可持續(xù)發(fā)展力較強(qiáng);臨洮縣、安定區(qū)、渭源縣、隴西縣和通渭縣均小于1,可持續(xù)發(fā)展力較弱。系統(tǒng)的綜合發(fā)展水平呈“南部—中部—北部”遞減趨勢(shì)的地理分布。強(qiáng)、弱、不協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展型區(qū)域的農(nóng)田面積分別占全市農(nóng)田總面積14.44%、49.46%和36.10%。
[Abstract]:Dingxi city is located in central Gansu Province, landform type complex, climate drought, serious lack of water resources, serious soil erosion, frequent natural disasters, is the typical eco fragile region. Especially agricultural farming is the foundation of economic development in Dingxi City, the sustainable development of agriculture is directly related to the safety of the ecological environment in the region. The farmland ecological system as the basis of agricultural economy, efficient use of resources, the reasonable high yield planting structure determines the stable development of the agricultural economy. Thus the quantitative evaluation of farmland ecosystem in Dingxi has important value. This paper uses the theory of emergy analysis of Dingxi farmland ecosystem emergy input-output structure, resource utilization efficiency and sustainable development status analysis and evaluation, the main conclusions are as follows: (1) 2001-2014 years, Dingxi farmland ecosystem, total emergy input and a growth trend year by year, by 2 3.67 001 years of growth in 2014 to 4.61 * 1021sej * 1021sej, an increase of 25.78%. contribution of environmental resources is larger and the downward trend. The total energy input to auxiliary energy, industrial auxiliary non renewable energy input, fertilizer energy input, the average proportion of up to 91.77%; the organic energy input update in the human and animal into a larger, the average proportion was 63.82% and 23.14%, the animal energy input in decreasing year by year. Emergy input density and emergy investment ratio showed an increasing trend. The study shows that the economic operation in Dingxi city of agricultural production in the proportion of more and more big, the degree of mechanization has increase of the natural environment depends on more and more low, the sustainable development ability of the system is on the decline. The space, counties (districts) of farmland ecosystem emergy input structure difference, the social and economic development of Lintao county and Anding District etc. The county (District) emergy investment has obvious advantages. (2) 2001-2014 years, Dingxi farmland ecosystem total emergy output showed an overall growth trend, from 2001 1.55 to 2014 growth of 2.58 * 1021sej * 1021sej, an increase of emergy density increased as the 68.09%. system, an increase of 66.96%. the emergy output of crops are corn, wheat, potato, herbs, oil and beans. During the study, corn, potato, herbs can output a growing trend, the corn increased by 8.38 times; wheat, oil, beans emergy output decreased; beet, fruit, vegetable, melon and emergy output a smaller proportion. The planting structure evenness index remained stable, the average for the 1.72. study, the level of productivity of farmland ecosystem in Dingxi increased year by year. Space, counties (districts) of farmland ecosystem emergy density difference, and Zhangxian Minxian high, productivity level is relatively good; other county (District) is relatively low, relatively low level of productivity. The counties (districts) in different crops on the formation of the advantages of scale efficiency of each. (3) 2001-2014 years, Dingxi farmland ecosystem, resource utilization efficiency is low, the net energy output rate average 0.53, the total output value can be far lower than the auxiliary energy input, the system has been in a state of "loss", agricultural products are not competitive in the market. The space, counties (districts) the net energy output rate significantly, up to 1.03 more than 1 Zhang county, other counties (districts) were less than 1. indicating Zhangxian energy output exceeds the auxiliary energy input, resource utilization efficiency is high; the other county (District) resource utilization efficiency is low, the production condition is high input and low output. The results show that irrigation water, organic fertilizer, chemical fertilizer and agricultural machinery on the system can significantly affect the output, environmental resources And the animal was negatively correlated, indicating that Dingxi's barren land, the need to constantly replenish energy from outside the system, in the future should increase investment in agricultural production of organic fertilizer and agricultural mechanization, as much as possible to create favorable conditions for irrigation of farmland irrigation. (4) 2001-2014, set the sustainable development index, farmland ecological system a downward trend, but rebounded at the end of the study, were less than 1, the system of ecological economy is consumption, sustainable development is weak. The environmental load rate index was less than 3, less pressure on the environment, but the continued growth trend shows that the environmental pressure will continue to increase. The space, county (District) system of sustainable development index is significantly different, Zhang county and Minxian more than 1, a strong force of sustainable development; Lintao County, Anding District, Weiyuan County, Longxi county and Tongwei county were less than 1, sustainable development is weak. The comprehensive development level of the system is "South The geographical distribution of the declining trend in the middle and the north. The farmland area of the strong, weak and uncoordinated development areas accounts for 14.44%, 49.46% and 36.10%. of the total area of the whole city's farmland, respectively.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：S181

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 張志功;劉淑英;王平;王瑩;王坤;;民勤縣耕地集約利用空間格局分析[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2013年10期

2 林培治;;生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng)能值分析綜述[J];安徽農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào)(下半月刊);2012年18期

3 周麗萍;王平;劉淑英;張學(xué)昕;;1990—2010年高臺(tái)縣耕地生態(tài)足跡和承載力動(dòng)態(tài)研究[J];干旱地區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)研究;2012年04期

4 周俊霞;劉淑英;王平;;甘肅省耕地利用效益時(shí)空分異特征[J];湖北農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2012年02期

5 蘇芮;陳亞寧;李衛(wèi)紅;周洪華;馬雁飛;王國(guó)剛;;基于能值理論的農(nóng)業(yè)復(fù)合系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)與案例研究[J];中國(guó)沙漠;2012年01期

6 王千;金曉斌;周寅康;;糧食主產(chǎn)區(qū)種植業(yè)生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng)投入產(chǎn)出能值空間差異與態(tài)勢(shì)研究——以河北省為例[J];自然資源學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

7 王有霞;王平;劉淑英;;涼州區(qū)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)價(jià)值的變化[J];干旱地區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)研究;2011年05期

8 馬亞蘭;劉普幸;;河西走廊金塔綠洲農(nóng)業(yè)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)資源環(huán)境效應(yīng)綜合評(píng)價(jià)[J];中國(guó)沙漠;2011年03期

9 周婧;王遠(yuǎn);陳潔;;基于能值分析的蘇州市城市生態(tài)系統(tǒng)可持續(xù)發(fā)展評(píng)估[J];四川環(huán)境;2010年04期

10 鐘珍梅;翁伯琦;王義祥;黃勤樓;;生態(tài)系統(tǒng)能值理論研究進(jìn)展及若干問(wèn)題思考[J];福建農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

中國(guó)碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前5條

1 黃鈴凌;基于能值分析的民勤綠洲農(nóng)田生態(tài)系統(tǒng)可持續(xù)發(fā)展評(píng)價(jià)[D];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

2 楊曉娟;基于能值理論的內(nèi)蒙古鄂托克旗生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng)可持續(xù)發(fā)展能力研究[D];新疆師范大學(xué);2010年

3 林長(zhǎng)偉;甘肅省景泰縣農(nóng)業(yè)生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng)能值分析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2009年

4 杜博洋;河北省耕地系統(tǒng)能值分析[D];河北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

5 李榮;湖北省生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng)的能值分析[D];華中師范大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1427645