本文選題：礦井地質(zhì)類型　切入點(diǎn)：定量評(píng)價(jià)　出處：《西安科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：礦井地質(zhì)定量劃分是煤礦地質(zhì)工作的一項(xiàng)基礎(chǔ)工作,它關(guān)系到煤礦后續(xù)的生產(chǎn),因而具有非常重要的作用。礦井地質(zhì)類型定量評(píng)價(jià)主要涉及到礦井的構(gòu)造、煤層、水文、瓦斯、煤層頂?shù)装宓榷鄠�(gè)方面,本文以《煤礦地質(zhì)工作規(guī)定》、《煤、泥炭地質(zhì)勘查規(guī)范》(DZ/T0215-2002)與《煤礦防治水規(guī)定》為評(píng)價(jià)依據(jù),將評(píng)價(jià)數(shù)據(jù)整理到建好的地質(zhì)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)中,通過建立一整套評(píng)價(jià)體系,初步實(shí)現(xiàn)礦井地質(zhì)類型的定量評(píng)價(jià)。本文采用Vfp數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)語(yǔ)言建立簡(jiǎn)單的地質(zhì)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù),將礦井中涉及的地質(zhì)數(shù)據(jù)整理到地質(zhì)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)中,數(shù)據(jù)主要來(lái)源于礦井地質(zhì)臺(tái)賬,為后續(xù)礦井地質(zhì)類型劃分做好數(shù)據(jù)基礎(chǔ);構(gòu)造復(fù)雜程度主要涉及到礦井中的褶皺、斷層及巖漿巖,選取地質(zhì)構(gòu)造評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)及經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)指標(biāo),選用灰色關(guān)聯(lián)法對(duì)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行篩選并對(duì)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行賦予權(quán)重,采用模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法進(jìn)行構(gòu)造復(fù)雜程度等級(jí)的評(píng)定;煤層穩(wěn)定程度評(píng)價(jià)主要選擇數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)的方法來(lái)計(jì)算煤層平均厚度、煤厚可采系數(shù)、煤厚變異系數(shù)這三個(gè)指標(biāo),從而來(lái)反映煤厚離散程度與可采性;選擇趨勢(shì)面分析的方法來(lái)說(shuō)明煤層厚度的空間賦存特征及變化規(guī)律性,評(píng)價(jià)等級(jí)的評(píng)定選取模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法;礦井水文地質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)主要將水文數(shù)據(jù)從數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)表單中提取出來(lái),對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行計(jì)算、分析,從而按照《煤礦防治水規(guī)定》,給出評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果;礦井瓦斯地質(zhì)類型通過分析礦井瓦斯的涌出量,就可以給出最終評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果;其他開采地質(zhì)條件的評(píng)價(jià)主要涉及到煤層頂?shù)装宸�(wěn)定性評(píng)價(jià)、煤層傾角與其他特殊地質(zhì)條件的評(píng)價(jià),其中煤層頂?shù)装宸�(wěn)定性評(píng)價(jià)是一個(gè)難點(diǎn),目前沒有一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),本文在借鑒文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,初步采用模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法對(duì)煤層頂?shù)装宸�(wěn)定性進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),但評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果仍需后續(xù)不斷驗(yàn)證;最終,采用“就高不就低”的原則,給出礦井地質(zhì)類型劃分結(jié)果。將建立好的評(píng)價(jià)體系應(yīng)用到東坡礦井中,定量評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果與原有的定性評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果一致,說(shuō)明所建立的評(píng)價(jià)體系是正確的、合理的,從而可為其他礦井地質(zhì)定量劃分提供一定的借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:The quantitative classification of mine geology is a basic work of coal mine geological work, which is related to the follow-up production of coal mine, so it plays a very important role. The quantitative evaluation of mine geological type mainly involves the structure of mine, coal seam, hydrology, gas, etc. On the basis of coal mine geological work regulation, coal and peat geological exploration code, DZ / T0215-2002) and coal mine water control regulation, this paper collates the evaluation data into the established geological database. Through the establishment of a set of evaluation systems, the quantitative evaluation of mine geological types is preliminarily realized. In this paper, a simple geological database is established by using Vfp database language, and the geological data involved in the mine are arranged into the geological database. The data are mainly derived from mine geological records, which provide a good data basis for the subsequent classification of mine geological types; the structural complexity mainly relates to the folds, faults and magmatic rocks in the mine, and the evaluation indexes of geological structure and economic and technical indicators are selected. The grey correlation method is used to screen the index and give weight to the index, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the grade of structural complexity, and the mathematical statistical method is mainly used to calculate the average thickness of coal seam in the evaluation of coal seam stability. The coal thickness mining coefficient and coal thickness variation coefficient are the three indexes to reflect the coal thickness dispersion degree and mining ability, and the trend surface analysis method is chosen to explain the spatial occurrence characteristics and variation regularity of coal seam thickness. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is selected for the evaluation of evaluation grade, and the hydrological data is extracted from the database form in the evaluation of mine hydrogeology, the data is calculated and analyzed, and the evaluation results are given according to the regulations on preventing and controlling Water in Coal Mines. By analyzing the quantity of gas emission, the final evaluation results can be obtained. The evaluation of other mining geological conditions mainly involves the evaluation of the stability of coal seam roof and floor, the evaluation of coal seam inclination angle and other special geological conditions. The stability evaluation of coal seam roof and floor is a difficult point, but there is no unified evaluation standard at present. Based on the reference of literature, this paper uses fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate the stability of coal seam roof and floor. However, the evaluation results still need to be verified continuously. Finally, the classification results of mine geological types are given by using the principle of "whether high or low". The established evaluation system is applied to Dongpo mine. The quantitative evaluation results are consistent with the original qualitative evaluation results, which shows that the established evaluation system is correct and reasonable, which can be used for reference for the quantitative division of other mine geology.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：TD163

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王長(zhǎng)申;武強(qiáng);馬國(guó)平;李文剛;白林;;復(fù)雜條件下礦井水文地質(zhì)類型劃分方法[J];煤炭學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

2 許繼影;戴洪寶;;大演武礦井水文地質(zhì)類型劃分[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2015年20期

3 郭小銘;;基于綜合分析法的礦井水文地質(zhì)類型劃分[J];中州煤炭;2015年09期

4 李家宏;朱炎銘;唐鑫;劉宇;;唐山礦西南區(qū)構(gòu)造復(fù)雜程度的熵函數(shù)評(píng)價(jià)[J];煤田地質(zhì)與勘探;2015年03期

5 劉太忠;李云峰;劉雷;;海孜煤礦礦井水文地質(zhì)類型劃分[J];西部探礦工程;2015年02期

6 周起謀;李小明;向曉蕊;劉賽;;雙龍煤業(yè)礦井水文地質(zhì)類型劃分[J];華北科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年09期

7 霍振龍;程紹強(qiáng);劉軍;;寺河煤礦(西區(qū))水文地質(zhì)類型劃分探討[J];華北科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年09期

8 奚趙懷;;南橋礦礦井水文地質(zhì)條件評(píng)價(jià)探析[J];煤炭與化工;2014年07期

9 張曉葉;張永祥;任仲宇;王慧峰;段智隆;;不同地下水水質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)方法的比較及實(shí)例應(yīng)用[J];水資源與水工程學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

10 陳萍;殷廣標(biāo);;淮南新集一礦13-1煤層穩(wěn)定性影響因素分析[J];山東工業(yè)技術(shù);2013年14期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 魏迎春;煤礦床勘查輔助決策及關(guān)鍵問題研究[D];中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué)（北京）;2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 賀俊;煤炭地質(zhì)勘查類型定量研究[D];西安科技大學(xué);2016年

2 王鵬;陜北地方煤礦資源/儲(chǔ)量動(dòng)態(tài)管理研究[D];西安科技大學(xué);2015年

3 陳貴祥;口孜東礦13-1煤層頂板工程地質(zhì)特征及穩(wěn)定性評(píng)價(jià)[D];安徽理工大學(xué);2014年

4 裴韶華;基于優(yōu)化的神經(jīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)模型在礦井瓦斯涌出預(yù)測(cè)中的應(yīng)用研究[D];太原理工大學(xué);2014年

5 劉京;綜合地質(zhì)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)應(yīng)用系統(tǒng)開發(fā)關(guān)鍵技術(shù)研究[D];中南大學(xué);2012年

6 賀小龍;董家河礦井地質(zhì)構(gòu)造定量評(píng)價(jià)及預(yù)測(cè)[D];西安科技大學(xué);2011年

7 郭東椺;模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)在布爾臺(tái)井田煤層頂板穩(wěn)定性中的應(yīng)用[D];西安理工大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1578790