本文從選擇港口時(shí)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)決策角度,對(duì)最廣泛的多標(biāo)準(zhǔn)決策技術(shù)之一層次分析過程（AHP）進(jìn)行了評(píng)述。首先,分析為了做出決定而被考慮的不同的重要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。這些航運(yùn)公司近年來針對(duì)的是附加值更高的業(yè)務(wù):港務(wù)局競(jìng)相將航運(yùn)公司作為客戶,因此,擁有一個(gè)運(yùn)營發(fā)展良好并能妥善處理所有類型和規(guī)模的港口船到達(dá)的港口非常重要。大多數(shù)線路運(yùn)輸公司今天或多或少都會(huì)看到這一趨勢(shì)的影響。在這種情況下,航運(yùn)線路在港口的選擇中扮演著重要的角色。與此同時(shí),拉丁美洲港口不僅在國內(nèi)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力很強(qiáng)而且在國際上競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力也在持續(xù)增強(qiáng)。本文采用層次分析法（AHP）來檢驗(yàn)從瓜亞基爾,埃斯梅拉達(dá)斯,曼塔和玻利瓦爾港口選擇中的六個(gè)港口選擇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)（港口地理位置,水量,貨運(yùn)量,港口費(fèi)和碼頭處理費(fèi),IT能力和腹地）。模型結(jié)果顯示,地理位置,水深,腹地和貨物量是港口選擇的最重要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。競(jìng)爭(zhēng)和港口發(fā)展也是再次考慮港口選擇的重要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。提出了一些有利于港口整合和發(fā)展的能力建議,這樣國家港口就會(huì)更具競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,吸引更多的客戶。 

【文章來源】：大連海事大學(xué)遼寧省 211工程院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：68 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ABSTRACT
摘要
LIST OF SYMBOLS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Background
        1.1.1 Importance of the Topic
        1.1.2 Problem Statement
        1.1.3 Literature Review
        1.1.4 Dissertation Outline
    1.2 Scope and Limitation of the Research
    1.3 Objective
    1.4 Methodology
    1.5 Port Structure and Current Situation of the Ports in Ecuador
CHAPTER 2 PORT SELECTION OVERVIEW
    2.1 Seaport and its Role
        2.1.1 Seaports
        2.1.2 Role seaport
        2.1.3 Importance of Port Selection
    2.2 Port Selection Criteria
    2.3 Port Selection Method
CHAPTER 3 PORT'S SYSTEM AND ITS FUTURE
    3.1 Definitions
        3.1.1 Ports
        3.1.2 Port Selection Criteria
        3.1.3 Analytical Hierarchy Process
        3.1.4 Seaport
    3.2 Analysis of Ports in Ecuador
        3.2.1 Port of Guayaquil
        3.2.2 Port of Esmeraldas
        3.2.3 Port of Manta
        3.2.4 Port Bolivar
    3.3 Port System in Ecuador
    3.4 Competitiveness
        3.4.1 Competitiveness Between National Ports
        3.4.2 Competitiveness Between International Ports
    3.5 Future Ecuadorian Ports' Projects
        3.5.1 DP World Port of Posorja-Deep Water Port Project in Posorja
        3.5.2 Manta-Manaos Multimodal Axis
        3.5.3 Deep Water Port Project in Manta
    3.6 Conclusions
CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
    4.1 Analytical Hierarchy Process
        4.1.1 Introduction
        4.1.2 Hierarchies
        4.1.3 Measurement
        4.1.4 Priorities
        4.1.5 Consistency
    4.2 Apply AHP to Port Selection
        4.2.1 Selection of Criteria
        4.2.2 Hierarchy Building
        4.2.3 Model Calculation
    4.3 Parties involved in Port Choice
    4.4 Apply AHP to Port Selection
    4.5 Research results
        4.5.1 Research Result Presentation and Interpretation
    4.6 Conclusions
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
    5.1 Conclusions
    5.2 Recommendations
REFERENCES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS



本文編號(hào)：3200871