【摘要】：近年來，隨著法治社會的不斷推進(jìn)，海事執(zhí)法工作人員在執(zhí)法過程中會遇到各種風(fēng)險，這些風(fēng)險如果不加以認(rèn)識，會給海事部門的公信力造成一定的損失。因此，研究通航管理中海事執(zhí)法風(fēng)險因素，，并對海事執(zhí)法進(jìn)行風(fēng)險評價，根據(jù)風(fēng)險評價結(jié)果，海事機(jī)關(guān)可以針對性加強(qiáng)風(fēng)險防范，這樣有利于提高海事機(jī)關(guān)的執(zhí)法效率，對海事機(jī)關(guān)提高公信力具有重要的意義。 本文首先闡述了通航管理中海事執(zhí)法風(fēng)險的特點(diǎn)，分析了通航管理中海事執(zhí)法人員在執(zhí)法過程中可能存在的各種風(fēng)險因素，按照風(fēng)險評估指標(biāo)體系建立的基本原則，構(gòu)建了通航管理中海事執(zhí)法風(fēng)險評價指標(biāo)體系。 其次分析了風(fēng)險評估中常用的幾種評估方法及它們的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)。根據(jù)通航管理中海事執(zhí)法風(fēng)險因素既有模糊性，又具有灰色性，選擇模糊綜合評價和灰色系統(tǒng)相結(jié)合的灰色模糊綜合評估方法，運(yùn)用層次分析法確定各個風(fēng)險因素指標(biāo)的重要程度。灰色系統(tǒng)理論中運(yùn)用的是白化權(quán)函數(shù)，并請評價專家依據(jù)一定的評估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行評分，得到評估指標(biāo)的灰統(tǒng)計權(quán)向量。闡述了模糊灰色綜合評估方法的原理和步驟，并詳細(xì)描述了通航管理中海事執(zhí)法風(fēng)險的評價模型：確實(shí)風(fēng)險指標(biāo)體系、劃分風(fēng)險等級、確定評估灰類和白化權(quán)函數(shù)、專家打分得到灰色模糊權(quán)矩陣、確定各個風(fēng)險指標(biāo)權(quán)重、最后進(jìn)行灰色模糊綜合評判，得到通航管理中海事執(zhí)法風(fēng)險等級以及各個風(fēng)險指標(biāo)等級。 最后結(jié)合具體例子，運(yùn)用灰色模糊綜合評價模型進(jìn)行綜合評價，得到某海事局通航管理中海事執(zhí)法風(fēng)險的整體風(fēng)險情況，分析評估結(jié)果，并根據(jù)風(fēng)險評估結(jié)果提出相應(yīng)的風(fēng)險防范措施。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of the society ruled by law, maritime law enforcement personnel will encounter various risks in the process of law enforcement. If these risks are not recognized, they will cause certain losses to the credibility of maritime departments. Therefore, the risk factors of maritime law enforcement in navigation management are studied, and the risk evaluation of maritime law enforcement is carried out. According to the result of risk evaluation, maritime authorities can strengthen risk prevention in order to improve the efficiency of maritime law enforcement. It is of great significance to enhance the credibility of maritime authorities. In this paper, firstly, the characteristics of maritime law enforcement risk in navigation management are expounded, and various risk factors that may exist in the course of maritime law enforcement are analyzed, and the basic principles of risk assessment index system are established. The risk evaluation index system of maritime law enforcement in navigation management is constructed. Secondly, it analyzes several methods of risk assessment and their advantages and disadvantages. According to the fact that the risk factors of maritime law enforcement in navigation management are both fuzzy and grey, the method of grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation combined with grey system is chosen. Use analytic hierarchy process to determine the importance of each risk factor index. The whitening weight function is used in the grey system theory, and the evaluation expert is asked to score according to certain evaluation criteria, and the grey statistical weight vector of the evaluation index is obtained. This paper expounds the principle and steps of fuzzy grey comprehensive evaluation method, and describes in detail the evaluation model of maritime law enforcement risk in navigable management: the index system of real risk, the classification of risk, the determination of evaluation ash and whitening weight function. Experts score the grey fuzzy weight matrix and determine the weight of each risk index. Finally, the grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is carried out to get the maritime law enforcement risk grade and each risk index grade in navigation management. Finally, by using the grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, the overall risk of maritime law enforcement risk in the navigation management of a maritime administration is obtained, and the evaluation results are analyzed. According to the results of risk assessment, the corresponding risk prevention measures are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：集美大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：U692;D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 尹磊;;海事行政執(zhí)法的主要風(fēng)險形式及規(guī)避對策[J];中國海事;2009年04期

2 周玲;馬奔;;政府公共事務(wù)風(fēng)險管理國際經(jīng)驗(yàn)對中國的借鑒[J];山東社會科學(xué);2009年02期

3 樓永進(jìn);;提高水上巡航的有效性[J];水運(yùn)管理;2008年05期

4 朱曉妹;葉仁蓀;張重天;萬華;周學(xué)軍;林井萍;;運(yùn)用層次分析法確定崗位要素權(quán)重的技巧分析[J];鐵道工程學(xué)報;2010年05期

5 蘇為華,余明江;對灰色系統(tǒng)綜合評價方法中兩個問題的認(rèn)識[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2002年10期

6 崔艷武;高曉紅;湯萬金;;公共風(fēng)險、社會風(fēng)險與公共部門風(fēng)險管理——基于國內(nèi)外文獻(xiàn)挖掘的理論思考[J];標(biāo)準(zhǔn)科學(xué);2013年02期

7 李煜;;淺析海事行政執(zhí)法的風(fēng)險及對策[J];中國外資;2011年14期

8 唐鈞;;政府風(fēng)險管理的實(shí)踐與評述——以加拿大和英國政府的改革為例[J];中國行政管理;2009年04期

9 王飛;吳云錦;姜光忠;;海事行政執(zhí)法風(fēng)險誘因分析與防范對策研究[J];中外船舶科技;2011年04期

本文編號：2296778