【摘要】：裂解連桿加工技術(shù)作為最先進(jìn)的連桿制造技術(shù),它的質(zhì)量對發(fā)動機(jī)的性能有著無比重要的影響。但是裂解連桿要求材料同時具備脆斷性和良好的綜合力學(xué)性能,這嚴(yán)重限制了裂解連桿技術(shù)的發(fā)展。針對這一問題,通過雙金屬復(fù)合鑄造技術(shù)制備裂解連桿,這種方法可以使高碳鋼、鋁合金以及鈦合金用于裂解連桿的生產(chǎn)制造,突破裂解材料的局限性,但在對鑄坯鍛造的過程中很容易出現(xiàn)界面鍛裂、開裂,鍛后裂解區(qū)不能實現(xiàn)脆性裂解等問題。為了解決雙金屬鑄坯在鍛造過程中存在的問題,本文對25鋼和T10A復(fù)合連桿鑄坯進(jìn)行鍛造強(qiáng)化研究。研究結(jié)果表明,通過雙金屬鍛造處理可使鑄件試樣組織致密,界面不開裂,雙金屬的力學(xué)性能得到提高,能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)脆性裂解。本文的主要工作和結(jié)論如下:(1)首先通過熔模鑄造制備鋼制雙金屬鑄件,然后在不同工藝參數(shù)下對鑄件進(jìn)行鍛造處理以及熱處理,接著通過分析界面區(qū)域顯微組織,界面元素成分以及界面強(qiáng)度和硬度的變化來研究鍛件是否滿足裂解連桿的性能要求,最后對雙金屬鍛件進(jìn)行裂解與重裝試驗。(2)研究了雙金屬復(fù)合鑄造以及鍛造時界面的結(jié)合性能,并且選出了最優(yōu)的鑄造和鍛造工藝參數(shù)。結(jié)果表明,控制主體材料澆注溫度,裂解材料厚度在一定范圍內(nèi),雙金屬復(fù)合鑄件表面無鑄造缺陷,界面能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)熔合結(jié)合,形成一定厚度的擴(kuò)散層;鍛造過程中,試樣有向橢圓形變形的趨勢,裂解區(qū)具有一定的張力,在一定的鍛造比范圍內(nèi),雙金屬界面不開裂,界面始終保持冶金結(jié)合,能夠滿足雙金屬鍛造的要求。(3)通過研究不同鍛造工藝參數(shù)下界面的宏觀質(zhì)量、微觀組織變化、鍛件界面強(qiáng)度和界面區(qū)域顯微硬度的變化。得出鍛造溫度和鍛造比對鋼制雙金屬界面是否開裂具有較大的影響;冷卻方式對界面區(qū)域材料的微觀組織,強(qiáng)度和以及元素成分?jǐn)U散具有顯著影響;鍛后的調(diào)質(zhì)處理降低了界面區(qū)的顯微硬度和強(qiáng)度,提高了連桿主體的韌性和綜合性能,也保證了裂解材料依然可以脆性裂解。(4)研究了在不同裂解槽參數(shù)下的雙金屬鍛件的裂解與重裝試驗。結(jié)果表明當(dāng)裂解槽深度為0.5mm,裂解槽張角為60°,裂解區(qū)斷裂的斷口截面收縮率為1.47%,斷口表面平整,無掉渣、臺階等缺陷,具有明顯的脆性斷裂特征;重裝后的試樣比原始長度增加0.23mm,小于裂解連桿要求的0.5mm的誤差要求,表明鍛造后的試樣滿足裂解連桿的裝配要求。裂解試驗與重裝試驗的結(jié)果也驗證了鍛造工藝的合理性。
[Abstract]:As the most advanced manufacturing technology of connecting rod, the quality of pyrolysis rod has a great influence on the performance of engine. However, the pyrolysis rod requires both brittle fracture and good mechanical properties of the material, which seriously limits the development of pyrolytic linkage technology. In order to solve this problem, the pyrolytic connecting rod is prepared by bimetallic composite casting technology. This method can make high-carbon steel, aluminum alloy and titanium alloy used in the manufacture of pyrolytic connecting rod and break through the limitation of pyrolysis material. However, during the forging process of the billet, it is easy to crack at the interface and crack, and the brittle cracking can not be realized in the cracking zone after forging. In order to solve the problems existing in the forging process of bimetallic billet, the forging strengthening of 25 steel and T10A composite connecting rod billet is studied in this paper. The results show that by bimetallic forging treatment, the microstructure of the castings can be densified, the interface will not crack, the mechanical properties of bimetallic can be improved, and brittle cracking can be realized. The main work and conclusions are as follows: (1) Bimetallic steel castings are prepared by investment casting, then forging and heat treatment are carried out under different technological parameters, and then the microstructure of the interface region is analyzed. The change of interface element composition, interface strength and hardness to study whether the forging meets the performance requirements of pyrolysis link, Finally, the cracking and reloading tests of bimetallic forgings were carried out. (2) the bonding properties of bimetallic composite casting and the interface during forging were studied, and the optimum casting and forging process parameters were selected. The results show that there are no casting defects on the surface of bimetallic composite castings by controlling the pouring temperature of the main materials and the thickness of the pyrolysis materials, and the interface can be fused to form a certain thickness of diffusion layer. The specimen has the tendency of elliptical deformation, the cracking zone has a certain tension, in a certain range of forging ratio, the bimetallic interface does not crack, and the interface always maintains metallurgical bonding. It can meet the requirements of bimetallic forging. (3) by studying the change of macroscopic quality, microstructure, interface strength and microhardness of forgings under different forging process parameters. It is concluded that forging temperature and forging ratio have a great influence on the cracking of bimetallic interface in steel, and the cooling mode has a significant effect on the microstructure, strength and diffusion of elements in the interfacial zone. The tempering treatment after forging reduces the microhardness and strength of the interface zone and improves the toughness and comprehensive properties of the main body of the connecting rod. It also ensures that the pyrolysis material can still be brittle cracking. (4) the cracking and reloading tests of bimetallic forgings with different cracking tank parameters are studied. The results show that when the depth of cracking tank is 0.5 mm, the angle of crack is 60 擄, the shrinkage rate of fracture cross section is 1.47, the surface of fracture surface is flat, there is no slag drop, step and other defects, so it has obvious brittle fracture characteristics. The reassembled specimen is 0.23mm longer than the original length, which is less than the 0.5mm error required by the pyrolysis rod, which indicates that the forged specimen meets the assembly requirements of the pyrolytic link. The results of cracking test and reloading test also verified the rationality of forging process.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：TG316

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘玉洪;;熔模鑄造型殼變形等缺陷分析[J];鑿巖機(jī)械氣動工具;2014年04期

2 賀進(jìn);周漢;朱文琪;魯雄剛;李重河;;TiAl合金精密鑄造及定向凝固用耐火材料的研究現(xiàn)狀[J];材料導(dǎo)報;2014年15期

3 康海峰;李飛;趙彥杰;徐華蘋;王飛;呂和平;孫寶德;;高溫合金空心葉片精密鑄造用陶瓷型芯與型殼的研究現(xiàn)狀[J];材料工程;2013年08期

4 謝帆;王強(qiáng);;熔模鑄造型殼耐火材料及其選擇[J];熱加工工藝;2012年21期

5 姜銀方;龍昆;何藝;;連桿裂解加工技術(shù)的現(xiàn)狀與展望[J];制造技術(shù)與機(jī)床;2012年07期

6 劉春燕;周丹晨;李昌安;江學(xué)強(qiáng);;2A14鋁合金鍛件的熱處理工藝[J];金屬熱處理;2011年09期

7 劉贊豐;楊志剛;何善開;江水浩;;發(fā)動機(jī)連桿的裂解加工技術(shù)[J];現(xiàn)代零部件;2011年03期

8 王春會;魏志林;孔江波;;連桿漲斷工藝應(yīng)用可行性研究[J];遼寧師專學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2010年04期

9 錢文捷;魯倫文;;連桿零件的機(jī)械加工工藝規(guī)定[J];湖南農(nóng)機(jī);2010年11期

10 王珍;季曉玲;翟麗莉;呂志剛;;硅溶膠熔模鑄造型殼的微觀結(jié)構(gòu)分析[J];有機(jī)硅材料;2010年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄭黎明;發(fā)動機(jī)連桿裂解加工關(guān)鍵技術(shù)研究與裝備開發(fā)[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 錢俊康;復(fù)合雙金屬裂解連桿熔模鑄造工藝與性能研究[D];江蘇大學(xué);2016年

2 朱君罡;A390合金擠壓鑄造件組織與性能的研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2012年

3 周麗;半固態(tài)鍛壓制備雙金屬復(fù)合材料技術(shù)的研究[D];中南大學(xué);2011年

4 于冬;雙金屬復(fù)合滑動軸承的結(jié)構(gòu)與液態(tài)模鍛成形工藝研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2011年

5 周麗;擠壓鑄造雙金屬復(fù)合材料的成型工藝及微觀組織研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2009年

6 菅曉霞;韌/脆性材料裂解加工數(shù)值模擬[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

7 楊金娥;花鍵管擠壓成形規(guī)律研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2006年

8 魏仁委;轎車鋁合金輪轂鍛造成形技術(shù)研究[D];燕山大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：2213823