本文關(guān)鍵詞： 中國 韓國 環(huán)境政策工具 規(guī)制型政策工具 經(jīng)濟型政策工具 社會型政策工具　出處：《燕山大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：環(huán)境政策工具作為環(huán)境政策的有機組成部分,是連接環(huán)境政策目標與結(jié)果的橋梁,其選擇極大地影響和制約著環(huán)境治理的效果。當前我國面對嚴峻的環(huán)境狀況,政府采用多種環(huán)境政策工具來改善環(huán)境問題,取得了一定成效,但有待進一步提高。韓國在環(huán)境治理中通過環(huán)境政策工具的有效選擇和實施,在環(huán)境治理領(lǐng)域取得了比較明顯的成效,值得我們借鑒。本文利用文獻分析、比較分析、案例分析等研究方法,研究了強制型、經(jīng)濟激勵型、社會自愿型環(huán)境政策工具以及選擇依據(jù),并分別介紹了中韓兩國的主要環(huán)境政策工具及其實施情況。在此基礎(chǔ)上對兩國的環(huán)境政策工具的三種類型、選擇以及實施機制的比較分析發(fā)現(xiàn),兩國的環(huán)境政策工具的類型、選擇主體、實施主體都很相似,但由于環(huán)境管理體制、決策機制和社會自治能力的不同,兩國環(huán)境政策工具的選擇偏好、社會參與程度和實施的保障機制等方面存在一些差異。本文通過借鑒韓國利用環(huán)境政策工具治理環(huán)境的有效經(jīng)驗,結(jié)合我國實際情況,提出了完善我國環(huán)境政策工具的對策。首先,完善各類環(huán)境政策工具;其次,完善我國環(huán)境政策工具的選擇機制,健全環(huán)境政策工具選擇的決策機制和社會參與機制;再次,按照一定原則優(yōu)化我國環(huán)境政策工具的選擇和組合;最后,完善環(huán)境政策工具實施的保障機制,加強環(huán)境政策工具的法制建設(shè),構(gòu)建環(huán)境友好型市場經(jīng)濟體系,促進環(huán)境社會治理體系的形成和發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:As an organic part of environmental policy, environmental policy tool is a bridge connecting the goal and result of environmental policy, and its choice greatly influences and restricts the effect of environmental governance. The government has adopted a variety of environmental policy tools to improve environmental problems, which has achieved certain results, but needs to be further improved. South Korea in environmental governance through the effective selection and implementation of environmental policy tools. In the field of environmental governance has achieved more obvious results, worthy of our reference. This paper uses literature analysis, comparative analysis, case analysis and other research methods to study the mandatory type, economic incentive type. Social voluntary environmental policy tools and the basis of choice, and introduced the main environmental policy tools and their implementation in China and South Korea. On the basis of this, three types of environmental policy tools of the two countries are introduced. Through the comparative analysis of the choice and implementation mechanism, it is found that the types of environmental policy tools, the choice of the main body, and the implementation of the main body are very similar, but due to the environmental management system, decision-making mechanism and the ability of social autonomy are different. There are some differences between the two countries in the choice of environmental policy tools, the degree of social participation and the implementation of the protection mechanism. This paper draws lessons from South Korea's effective experience of using environmental policy tools to govern the environment. According to the actual situation of our country, this paper puts forward the countermeasures to perfect the environmental policy tools of our country. First, improve all kinds of environmental policy tools; Secondly, we should perfect the choice mechanism of environmental policy tool, the decision-making mechanism and social participation mechanism of environmental policy tool selection. Thirdly, optimize the choice and combination of environmental policy tools according to certain principles; Finally, we should perfect the safeguard mechanism of implementing environmental policy tools, strengthen the legal system construction of environmental policy tools, construct an environment-friendly market economy system, and promote the formation and development of environmental and social governance system.
【學位授予單位】：燕山大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：X321

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅敏;朱雪忠;;基于政策工具的中國低碳政策文本量化研究[J];情報雜志;2014年04期

2 宋姣姣;王麗萍;;環(huán)境政策工具的演化規(guī)律及其對我國的啟示[J];湖北社會科學;2011年05期

3 范純;;韓國環(huán)境保護法律機制研究[J];亞非縱橫;2010年05期

4 李晟旭;;我國環(huán)境政策工具的分類與發(fā)展趨勢[J];環(huán)境保護與循環(huán)經(jīng)濟;2010年01期

5 曾軍榮;;政策工具選擇與我國公共管理社會化[J];理論探討;2008年03期

6 張玲;楊文選;;污染削減—基于市場環(huán)境政策工具的分析[J];開發(fā)研究;2007年05期

7 宋英杰;;基于成本收益分析的環(huán)境規(guī)制工具選擇[J];廣東工業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2006年01期

8 楊海生;賈佳;周永章;;不確定條件下環(huán)境政策的時機選擇[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟技術(shù)經(jīng)濟研究;2006年01期

9 馬小明;趙月煒;;環(huán)境管制政策的局限性與變革——自愿性環(huán)境政策的興起[J];中國人口.資源與環(huán)境;2005年06期

10 劉丹鶴;環(huán)境政策工具對技術(shù)進步的影響機制及其啟示[J];自然辯證法研究;2003年01期

，

本文編號：1444306