【摘要】：大渡河金成礦帶基性巖脈分布廣泛,在大渡河金成礦帶內(nèi)各金礦床都有出現(xiàn),且空間走向也存在一定的差異。近年來(lái),很多學(xué)者、專家對(duì)該處基性巖脈與金成礦的關(guān)系提出了很多觀點(diǎn),有人認(rèn)為這些基性巖脈與大渡河金成礦帶上金的成礦有密切的關(guān)系,也有人認(rèn)為二者之間并沒(méi)有直接的關(guān)系。前者認(rèn)為大渡河金成礦帶各金礦床都有基性巖脈出現(xiàn)且多與含礦石英脈呈侵入接觸關(guān)系,后者認(rèn)為前者并沒(méi)有直接的證據(jù)說(shuō)明該區(qū)基性巖脈的形成期次與該區(qū)金礦形成的構(gòu)造期次相同,對(duì)其在成因上的關(guān)系并沒(méi)有系統(tǒng)的研究。針對(duì)該問(wèn)題,筆者在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下,通過(guò)對(duì)大渡河流域基性巖脈在不同時(shí)代、不同基性巖帶兩方面進(jìn)行詳細(xì)研究對(duì)比,得出以下認(rèn)識(shí):1.大渡河金成礦帶內(nèi)基性巖脈成巖年代主要分為三個(gè)時(shí)期:印支期(212Ma~224Ma)、加里東期(425Ma~435Ma)、晉寧期(731Ma~754Ma),其中晉寧期基性巖脈主要分布于基底雜巖中,加里東期、印支期基性巖脈分布較廣,在基底雜巖和沉積蓋層中都有出露。大渡河金成礦帶內(nèi)含礦石英的ESR測(cè)年表明其形成于喜山期(陳穎,2015)。綜合大渡河金成礦帶內(nèi)基性巖脈與含礦石英的巖石學(xué)特征及年代學(xué)分析,目前看來(lái),大渡河金成礦帶內(nèi)基性巖的形成時(shí)代要早于其中金礦。2.大渡河金成礦帶內(nèi)3個(gè)時(shí)期的基性巖脈形成于火山島弧環(huán)境、堿性洋中脊環(huán)境和板內(nèi)拉張環(huán)境;據(jù)所測(cè)得的研究區(qū)基性巖脈樣品的微量元素?cái)?shù)據(jù)顯示,Zr/Y比值、Zr/Nb比值均小于18,因此該區(qū)基性巖脈的成巖物質(zhì)來(lái)源于富集地幔。3.從地質(zhì)特征上可以看出研究區(qū)基性巖脈都發(fā)生了較強(qiáng)的蝕變作用,都具殘余變晶結(jié)構(gòu)的特點(diǎn),同時(shí)都受到了后期硅質(zhì)熱液流體的侵蝕作用。
[Abstract]:The basic rock veins in the Daduhe gold metallogenic belt are widely distributed, and all the gold deposits appear in the Daduhe gold metallogenic belt, and there are some differences in the spatial strike. In recent years, many scholars and experts have put forward a lot of views on the relationship between the basic vein and gold mineralization. Some people think that these basic rock veins are closely related to the mineralization of gold in the Dadu River gold metallogenic belt. Others argue that there is no direct relationship between the two. The former holds that the gold deposits in the Daduhe gold metallogenic belt have basic rock veins and have intrusive contact with ore-bearing veins. The latter holds that the former has no direct evidence to show that the formation stage of the basic vein in this area is the same as that of the gold deposit in this area, and there is no systematic study on the relationship between the origin of the basic vein and the tectonic stage of the gold deposit in this area. Aiming at this problem, the author, under the guidance of his tutor, makes a detailed study and comparison of the basic rock veins of the Dadu River Basin in different times and different basic rock belts, and obtains the following understanding: 1. The diagenetic age of the basic vein in the Daduhe gold metallogenic belt is divided into three periods: Indosinian (212Ma~224Ma), Caledonian (425Ma~435Ma), Jinning (731Ma~754Ma), in which the Jinning basic-vein is mainly distributed in the basement complex, and the Caledonian and Indosinian basic-vein are widely distributed. Both the basement complex and the sedimentary caprock are exposed. The ESR dating of ore-bearing elements in the Daduhe gold metallogenic belt indicates that it was formed in the Xishan period (Chen Ying 2015). Based on the petrological characteristics and geochronological analysis of the basic veins and ore-bearing rocks in the Daduhe gold metallogenic belt, it appears that the age of formation of the basic rocks in the Daduhe gold metallogenic belt is earlier than that of the gold ore. The basic veins of the three periods in the Daduhe gold metallogenic belt were formed in the volcanic island arc environment, the alkaline mid-oceanic ridge environment and the intraplate extensional environment. The trace element data of the basic vein samples in the study area show that the ratio of Zr / Y and Zr / NB are all less than 18, so the diagenetic material of the basic vein in this area is derived from the enriched mantle. From the geological characteristics, it can be seen that all the basic veins in the study area have undergone strong alteration, all have the characteristics of residual amorphous structure and have been eroded by siliceous hydrothermal fluids in the late stage of the study area.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：成都理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：P618.51

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 宋昊;張成江;李佑國(guó);鐘文麗;李家慶;;三江中段銅多金屬礦床流體成礦作用:微量元素地球化學(xué)證據(jù)[J];巖石學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

2 張志軍;龔慶杰;劉辰曦;沈柳生;;白馬崖金礦床地質(zhì)—地球化學(xué)特征及其成礦意義[J];黃金科學(xué)技術(shù);2014年06期

3 郭陽(yáng);王生偉;孫曉明;王子正;楊斌;廖震文;周邦國(guó);蔣小芳;侯林;楊波;;揚(yáng)子地臺(tái)西南緣古元古代末的裂解事件——來(lái)自武定地區(qū)輝綠巖鋯石U-Pb年齡和地球化學(xué)證據(jù)[J];地質(zhì)學(xué)報(bào);2014年09期

4 張成江;劉家鐸;劉顯凡;李佑國(guó);陽(yáng)正熙;;攀西地區(qū)金屬成礦系統(tǒng)[J];成都理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2009年04期

5 張貴山,溫漢捷,裘愉卓;閩西晚中生代基性巖脈的地球化學(xué)研究[J];地球化學(xué);2004年03期

6 倪師軍,張成江,滕彥國(guó);成礦流體地球化學(xué)界面:Ⅰ概念的由來(lái)及發(fā)展[J];地質(zhì)地球化學(xué);2001年03期

7 李曉峰,華仁民;韌性剪切帶內(nèi)流體作用的研究[J];巖石礦物學(xué)雜志;2000年04期

8 黃永平，吳健民，，劉肇昌;揚(yáng)子地臺(tái)西緣海相火山巖控礦特征[J];礦產(chǎn)與地質(zhì);1996年01期

9 石金良;;大渡河流域的新構(gòu)造運(yùn)動(dòng)與活斷層研究[J];水電站設(shè)計(jì);1985年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王明;藏北羌塘南部基性超基性巖的成因[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 劉陽(yáng);大渡河金成礦帶基性—超基性脈巖形成時(shí)代及成因探討[D];成都理工大學(xué);2016年

2 陳穎;大渡河流域不同賦礦層位金礦床特征對(duì)比[D];成都理工大學(xué);2015年

3 周建軍;白金臺(tái)子金礦床地質(zhì)特征及垂直分帶規(guī)律[D];成都理工大學(xué);2015年

4 黃君華;黃金坪金礦床地質(zhì)地球化學(xué)特征及成因探討[D];成都理工大學(xué);2015年

5 吳二紅;康定二里溝金礦床地質(zhì)特征及成因探討[D];成都理工大學(xué);2015年

6 徐速;龍門山中段基性一超基性巖類地質(zhì)特征及成因探討[D];成都理工大學(xué);2013年

本文編號(hào)：2173132