本文選題：塔里木臺(tái)盆區(qū)　切入點(diǎn)：低豐度　出處：《中國(guó)石油大學(xué)(北京)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：截止2013年,塔里木盆地臺(tái)盆區(qū)取得了許多有目共睹的勘探成效,然而,針對(duì)臺(tái)盆區(qū)海相油氣的來(lái)源厘定還存在問(wèn)題,主要表現(xiàn)為:目前已經(jīng)識(shí)別出兩套高豐度(TOC0.5%)海相烴源巖,包括寒武系-下奧陶統(tǒng)和中-上奧陶統(tǒng),但何者為主長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)存在爭(zhēng)議;同時(shí),以高豐度烴源巖貢獻(xiàn)為基礎(chǔ)的資源評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果與最新勘探實(shí)踐不匹配,存在預(yù)測(cè)資源量偏小的問(wèn)題,造成這些問(wèn)題的根源是未將低豐度烴源巖的貢獻(xiàn)列入考慮范圍。低豐度可以分為兩種類(lèi)型,一種是古高今低,生排烴作用導(dǎo)致現(xiàn)今豐度很低,這類(lèi)低豐度烴源巖是有利于油氣成藏的;另一種是古時(shí)候豐度就極低,發(fā)生排烴作用微弱或無(wú)法發(fā)生排烴作用,這一類(lèi)低豐度烴源巖對(duì)油氣成藏貢獻(xiàn)不大。如何區(qū)分這兩種類(lèi)型低豐度烴源巖,判識(shí)有效低豐度烴源巖并評(píng)價(jià)對(duì)油氣成藏貢獻(xiàn),是目前急需解決的問(wèn)題。本次研究選取塔里木盆地奧陶系低豐度烴源巖作為研究對(duì)象,根據(jù)排烴門(mén)限理論,計(jì)算了典型低豐度中上奧陶統(tǒng)巖石的實(shí)際含烴量與烴源巖排烴門(mén)限殘留烴量的關(guān)系,區(qū)分了塔里木盆地臺(tái)盆區(qū)奧陶系低豐度“已排烴/未排烴”兩類(lèi)烴源巖,對(duì)比了“已排烴/未排烴”兩類(lèi)低豐度源巖地化特征,并結(jié)合測(cè)井、地質(zhì)等綜合分析,從生烴母質(zhì)類(lèi)型與分布、有機(jī)質(zhì)富集與保存等多方面入手,揭示了已排烴低豐度烴源巖的成因機(jī)制是,在穩(wěn)定的生態(tài)系統(tǒng)內(nèi),富氫的浮游藻類(lèi)或疑源類(lèi)作為生烴母質(zhì),有機(jī)質(zhì)在良好的還原環(huán)境下保存。在此基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)對(duì)已排低豐度碳酸鹽巖烴源巖的主控因素分析,采用多元線性逐步回歸方法,建立了地化綜合判別指標(biāo)Ig定量預(yù)測(cè)和評(píng)價(jià)有效低豐度烴源巖模型,模型與源巖的生烴潛力、TOC、成熟度、S2/S1、S2五個(gè)因素相關(guān);根據(jù)已排低豐度碳酸鹽巖烴源巖的測(cè)井響應(yīng),采用多元非線性擬合方法,建立了測(cè)井綜合判別指標(biāo)Iw定量預(yù)測(cè)和評(píng)價(jià)有效低豐度烴源巖的模型,模型與GR、RD、U/TH相關(guān)。將上述判別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和定量預(yù)測(cè)方法在塔中地區(qū)應(yīng)用,計(jì)算了有效低豐度源巖的排烴量,并評(píng)價(jià)了有效低豐度源巖相對(duì)貢獻(xiàn),預(yù)測(cè)了臺(tái)盆區(qū)最有利層位和區(qū)域。研究結(jié)果表明,塔中地區(qū)中上奧陶統(tǒng)有效低豐度源巖排烴量為40.9×108t,相對(duì)貢獻(xiàn)為18%;塔里木盆地臺(tái)盆區(qū)最有利層位是一間房組,有效低豐度源巖體積占地層體積的23.46%,其次是良里塔格組和吐木休克組;最有利區(qū)域位于塔北隆起及南部斜坡,排烴量為163.6×108t。
[Abstract]:As of 2013, the Tai-basin area of the Tarim Basin has achieved many obvious exploration results. However, there are still problems in determining the source of marine oil and gas in the Tai-basin area, mainly as follows: at present, two sets of high-abundance TOC0.5) marine source rocks have been identified. Including Cambrian-Lower Ordovician and Middle-Upper Ordovician, but which is the main one has been disputed for a long time, and the results of resource evaluation based on the contribution of high-abundance hydrocarbon source rock do not match with the latest exploration practice. There are the problems of small predictive resources, which are caused by the failure to take the contribution of low abundance source rocks into consideration. Low abundance can be divided into two types, one is ancient high and low, and hydrocarbon generation and expulsion cause the present abundance is very low. This type of low-abundance source rock is conducive to hydrocarbon accumulation; the other is that the abundance of hydrocarbon is very low in ancient times, and hydrocarbon expulsion is weak or unable to occur. This kind of low abundance source rocks have little contribution to hydrocarbon accumulation. How to distinguish these two types of low abundance source rocks, identify effective low abundance source rocks and evaluate their contribution to oil and gas accumulation, This study selects Ordovician low abundance source rock in Tarim Basin as the object of study, according to the theory of hydrocarbon expulsion threshold, The relationship between the actual hydrocarbon content and the hydrocarbon expulsion threshold of source rock is calculated, and two types of hydrocarbon source rocks with low abundance of Ordovician in Tarim Basin are distinguished. In this paper, the geochemistry characteristics of two types of low abundance source rocks are compared, and combined with the comprehensive analysis of logging and geology, the types and distribution of hydrocarbon source material, the enrichment and preservation of organic matter, and so on, are discussed. It is revealed that the genetic mechanism of the hydrocarbon expulsion low abundance source rocks is that, in a stable ecosystem, hydrocarbon-rich phytoplankton or suspected source materials are used as source materials for hydrocarbon generation, and organic matter is preserved in a good reductive environment. Based on the analysis of the main controlling factors of carbonate source rocks with low abundance, and the multivariate linear stepwise regression method, a quantitative prediction and evaluation model of effective low abundance hydrocarbon source rocks was established by using the geochemistry comprehensive discriminant index Ig. The model is related to five factors of hydrocarbon generation potential of source rocks: TOC, maturity and S _ 2 / S _ 1 / S _ 2. According to the logging response of carbonate source rocks with low abundance, the multivariate nonlinear fitting method is used. A model for quantitative prediction and evaluation of effective low abundance source rocks by logging comprehensive discriminant index Iw is established. The model is related to GRRDU / TH. Applying the above criteria and quantitative prediction methods to the Tazhong area, the hydrocarbon expulsion of effective low abundance source rocks is calculated. The relative contribution of effective low abundance source rocks is evaluated and the most favorable horizon and region in the platform basin area are predicted. The effective low abundance source rocks of middle and upper Ordovician in Tazhong area are 40.9 脳 10 ~ 8t, and the relative contribution is 180.The most favorable horizon in the platform basin area of Tarim Basin is the Yijianfang formation, the effective low-abundance source rock covers 23.46% of the volume of the strata, the Lianglitag formation and the Tumu shock formation are the next. The most favorable area is located in the northern Tarim uplift and the southern slope with a hydrocarbon expulsion capacity of 163.6 脳 10 ~ (8) t.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)石油大學(xué)(北京)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：P618.13

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡進(jìn)功;盧龍飛;丁飛;樊馥;;烴源巖中黏土與可溶有機(jī)質(zhì)相互作用研究展望[J];同濟(jì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2009年12期

2 湯麗娜;;烴源巖測(cè)井識(shí)別在渤海灣石油開(kāi)發(fā)中的應(yīng)用[J];科技導(dǎo)報(bào);2011年21期

3 劉芳;陳恭洋;李光來(lái);;模糊聚類(lèi)分析在烴源巖評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];內(nèi)江科技;2013年01期

4 朱衛(wèi)華;;灰色關(guān)聯(lián)分析方法在烴源巖評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];江漢石油職工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

5 張志偉,張龍海;測(cè)井評(píng)價(jià)烴源巖的方法及其應(yīng)用效果[J];石油勘探與開(kāi)發(fā);2000年03期

6 曹寅;錢(qián)志浩;張渠;;烴源巖評(píng)價(jià)分析項(xiàng)目的優(yōu)化組合[J];海相油氣地質(zhì);2008年03期

7 王宗禮;李君;羅強(qiáng);邵麗艷;李向陽(yáng);;利用測(cè)井資料精細(xì)評(píng)價(jià)冀中坳陷廊固凹陷烴源巖[J];天然氣地球科學(xué);2012年03期

8 金鳳鳴;師玉雷;羅強(qiáng);董雄英;鐘雪梅;;廊固凹陷烴源巖精細(xì)評(píng)價(jià)研究及應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)石油勘探;2012年06期

9 楊濤濤;范國(guó)章;呂福亮;王彬;吳敬武;魯銀濤;;烴源巖測(cè)井響應(yīng)特征及識(shí)別評(píng)價(jià)方法[J];天然氣地球科學(xué);2013年02期

10 肖賢明,劉德漢,傅家謨,申家貴;烴源巖顯微熒光變化研究及其在油氣評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];石油與天然氣地質(zhì);1991年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 宋一濤;王忠;;濰北凹陷烴源巖的評(píng)價(jià)及原油的生成、運(yùn)移研究[A];第十屆全國(guó)有機(jī)地球化學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要匯編[C];2005年

2 張利;;利用不同測(cè)井模型評(píng)價(jià)烴源巖的研究應(yīng)用[A];中國(guó)地球物理·2009[C];2009年

3 趙玉婷;黃黨委;單玄龍;;松遼盆地南部伏龍泉斷陷烴源巖地化特征[A];科技創(chuàng)新與節(jié)能減排——吉林省第五屆科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集（下冊(cè)）[C];2008年

4 張明峰;妥進(jìn)才;張小軍;吳陳君;陳茹;郭力軍;;柴達(dá)木盆地烏南—綠草灘地區(qū)烴源巖地球化學(xué)特征[A];中國(guó)科學(xué)院地質(zhì)與地球物理研究所2012年度（第12屆）學(xué)術(shù)論文匯編——離退休和其他部門(mén)[C];2013年

5 王淑芝;俞萱;;松遼盆地石炭-二疊系烴源巖有機(jī)質(zhì)成熟度特征研究[A];第十屆全國(guó)有機(jī)地球化學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要匯編[C];2005年

6 李瑞江;付立新;楊樺;梁鋒;鄧以清;;江西萍樂(lè)坳陷西部下二疊統(tǒng)烴源巖評(píng)價(jià)[A];第十屆全國(guó)有機(jī)地球化學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要匯編[C];2005年

7 宋換新;文志剛;唐友軍;;南陵、無(wú)為盆地下二疊統(tǒng)棲霞組烴源巖評(píng)價(jià)[A];第十屆全國(guó)有機(jī)地球化學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要匯編[C];2005年

8 饒松;唐曉音;朱傳慶;胡圣標(biāo);汪集e，

本文編號(hào)：1679782