【摘要】：近十年來(lái),國(guó)內(nèi)"PX"項(xiàng)目頻頻見諸于報(bào)端,成為飽受爭(zhēng)議的對(duì)象,甚至引發(fā)了多起群體性事件。在一些普通民眾心目中,"PX"不再是對(duì)二甲苯這個(gè)化工名詞,而是"劇毒"和"危險(xiǎn)"的代名詞。究竟"PX"項(xiàng)目暗藏巨大風(fēng)險(xiǎn),還是安全可靠?專家對(duì)此發(fā)表怎樣的見解?有何判斷?從報(bào)紙中的專家話語(yǔ)文本入手,嘗試采用詹姆斯·保羅·吉(James Paul Gee)的綜合話語(yǔ)分析法來(lái)考察"反PX派"和"挺PX派"專家是如何實(shí)現(xiàn)話語(yǔ)建構(gòu)任務(wù)的,指出"專家共同體"內(nèi)部的話語(yǔ)之爭(zhēng)對(duì)PX形象的建構(gòu)作用,并通過(guò)分析、對(duì)比專家話語(yǔ)"修辭建構(gòu)"的實(shí)踐邏輯,結(jié)合文本產(chǎn)生的具體情景,探索話語(yǔ)背后的社會(huì)影響因素。
[Abstract]:In the past ten years, PX projects have been frequently reported in the newspaper, and become the object of much controversy, and even triggered many mass incidents. In the eyes of some ordinary people, "PX" is no longer a chemical term for p-xylene, but a synonym for "highly toxic" and "dangerous." Is the "PX" project potentially risky, or is it safe and reliable? What is the expert's opinion on this? What's your judgment? Starting with the text of expert discourse in newspapers, this paper attempts to use the comprehensive discourse analysis method of James Paul (James Paul Gee) to investigate how the experts of "anti-PX" and "Ting PX" have realized the task of discourse construction. This paper points out the role of the discourse controversy within the "expert Community" in constructing the image of PX, and through the analysis, compares the practical logic of the "rhetoric construction" of the expert discourse, and explores the social influence factors behind the discourse by combining the concrete situation of the text.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)科學(xué)院大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“爭(zhēng)議性科技議題的公眾參與科學(xué)傳播研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):16CXW018)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：TQ086;TQ241.13

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 潘志慶;;男士潔面乳包裝的話語(yǔ)分析——以曼秀雷敦男士冰爽活性炭潔面乳為例[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2013年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2375320