本文選題：道路運(yùn)輸企業(yè) + 安全指標(biāo)體系��； 參考：《江南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，我國(guó)重（特）大交通事故頻繁發(fā)生，道路運(yùn)輸安全生產(chǎn)形勢(shì)日趨嚴(yán)峻。對(duì)道路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)開展安全研究是一項(xiàng)緊迫而又具有重大意義的研究課題。由于傳統(tǒng)的道路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)安全研究缺乏科學(xué)的指標(biāo)分析工具而導(dǎo)致指標(biāo)與戰(zhàn)略之間沒(méi)有承接，缺乏邏輯性。文章首次將績(jī)效棱柱理論引入道路運(yùn)輸安全領(lǐng)域，運(yùn)用其嚴(yán)密的邏輯和彈性的框架，結(jié)合道路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)安全管理的特殊性，嘗試性地將指標(biāo)確立的重點(diǎn)放在企業(yè)內(nèi)部的安全戰(zhàn)略、安全流程和安全能力維度上，確立道路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)三個(gè)縱向維度下的安全因素。另一方面，在對(duì)重大交通事故原因、交通政策分析的基礎(chǔ)上，借鑒其它行業(yè)安全因素，得出道路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)中的駕駛員、車輛、綜合管理三個(gè)橫向?qū)用嫦掠绊戇\(yùn)輸安全的重要因素。將橫向、縱向因素結(jié)合初步設(shè)計(jì)出二維安全指標(biāo)集，，該指標(biāo)集包含33個(gè)底層指標(biāo)。通過(guò)118份問(wèn)卷調(diào)查，運(yùn)用SPSS因子分析對(duì)其驗(yàn)證，結(jié)果表明33個(gè)底層指標(biāo)縱向維度相關(guān)性高可以保留，且橫向?qū)用嫦嚓P(guān)性由駕駛員、車輛、綜合管理三個(gè)層面分解為駕駛員、車輛、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理和日常安全管理四個(gè)層面。文章最終確立了四個(gè)橫向?qū)用媾c三個(gè)縱向維度相結(jié)合的道路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)安全指標(biāo)集。通過(guò)第二輪專家問(wèn)卷調(diào)查，請(qǐng)10位專家對(duì)指標(biāo)、維度和層面分別進(jìn)行權(quán)重對(duì)比打分，運(yùn)用層次分析法計(jì)算得出駕駛員層面權(quán)重占48.7%，車輛層面權(quán)重占22.9%，風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理層面權(quán)重占18.0%，日常管理層面權(quán)重占10.3%；戰(zhàn)略權(quán)重49.3%，流程31.2%，能力19.6%；得出一套科學(xué)規(guī)范且可行性強(qiáng)的道路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)安全指標(biāo)體系。筆者構(gòu)建的道路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)安全指標(biāo)體系不僅能夠作為企業(yè)駕駛員部門、車輛管理部門、綜合管理部門和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理部門的橫向安全指標(biāo)，也能為企業(yè)提供從高層管理到基層運(yùn)營(yíng)的縱向考評(píng)指標(biāo)�？朔藗鹘y(tǒng)道路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)安全指標(biāo)的單一性和缺乏關(guān)聯(lián)性的問(wèn)題，對(duì)企業(yè)安全生產(chǎn)管理具有一定的指導(dǎo)意義和應(yīng)用價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:In recent years, heavy traffic accidents occur frequently in China, and the situation of road transportation safety is becoming more and more serious. It is an urgent and significant research topic for road transportation enterprises to carry out safety research. Because the traditional road transportation enterprise safety research lacks the scientific index analysis tool, resulting in the index and the strategy does not undertake, lacks the logic. This paper introduces the performance prism theory into the field of road transport safety for the first time, applies its strict logic and elastic framework, and combines the particularity of road transport enterprise safety management. This paper tries to lay emphasis on the internal safety strategy, safety process and safety capability of the enterprise, and establish the safety factors under the three vertical dimensions of road transport enterprises. On the other hand, on the basis of analyzing the causes of major traffic accidents and traffic policies, and drawing lessons from the safety factors of other industries, it is concluded that drivers and vehicles in road transport enterprises, Integrated management of three horizontal levels of transport safety under the important factors. The two-dimensional safety index set is designed by combining the horizontal and longitudinal factors. The index set consists of 33 underlying indexes. SPSS factor analysis was used to verify the results of 118 questionnaires. The results showed that the high correlation of the longitudinal dimension of 33 bottom indicators could be maintained, and the horizontal correlation was decomposed into driver, vehicle and integrated management from three levels, the driver, the vehicle and the comprehensive management. Vehicle, risk management and daily safety management four levels. Finally, the paper establishes the road transport enterprise safety index set which combines four horizontal levels and three vertical dimensions. Through the second round of expert questionnaires, 10 experts were asked to compare the weights of indicators, dimensions and levels. The weight of driver level is 48.7%, vehicle level is 22.9%, risk management level is 18.0, daily management level is 10.3; strategic weight is 49.3%, process is 31.2, ability is 19.6b; and a set of scientific norms is feasible. Strong road transportation enterprise safety index system. The road transportation enterprise safety index system constructed by the author can not only be used as the horizontal safety index of the driver department, the vehicle management department, the comprehensive management department and the risk management department of the enterprise. Can also provide for enterprises from top management to grass-roots operation of vertical evaluation indicators. It overcomes the problems of the singularity and lack of relevance of the traditional road transportation enterprise safety index, and has certain guiding significance and application value for the enterprise safety production management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：U492.8;F512.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱玉媛;牟凱旋;;面向公眾需求的檔案服務(wù)績(jī)效評(píng)估——基于績(jī)效棱柱的評(píng)估模型構(gòu)建與運(yùn)行[J];檔案管理;2011年04期

2 李盡法;許正中;;績(jī)效棱柱在新績(jī)效預(yù)算中的應(yīng)用分析[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)機(jī)化;2009年01期

3 祝昭,郭潔;道路運(yùn)輸市場(chǎng)管理體制面臨的問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[J];公路交通科技;2005年04期

4 董正亮;王方寧;郭啟明;景國(guó)勛;張軍波;張永全;;以平衡記分卡為中心構(gòu)建安全績(jī)效管理系統(tǒng)[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2007年11期

5 孟祥英;辛國(guó)軍;;試論績(jī)效棱柱與作業(yè)基礎(chǔ)預(yù)算的結(jié)合[J];會(huì)計(jì)之友(下旬刊);2009年05期

6 王麗華;俞金國(guó);;城市旅游地旅游安全評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[J];安全與環(huán)境工程;2010年02期

7 劉清;曹斌;;高速公路交通安全評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的建立[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年06期

8 常建娥;蔣太立;;層次分析法確定權(quán)重的研究[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(信息與管理工程版);2007年01期

9 李柯;張勝;;空中交通管理中心安全預(yù)警管理信息系統(tǒng)研究[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(信息與管理工程版);2007年08期

10 劉興太;楊震;程洪海;李宏偉;馬勇;何冰;王奕飛;;層次分析法判斷矩陣在確定科研績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)權(quán)重系數(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)科技信息;2008年19期

本文編號(hào)：1885147