發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-05 22:45

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 軟土 深基坑工程 優(yōu)化設(shè)計(jì) 重力式水泥土墻 雙排樁　出處：《暨南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：南沙地區(qū)位于穗港澳的幾何中心，是廣州未來發(fā)展的核心地區(qū)。該地區(qū)多為海陸交互相的軟弱黏性土，，工程地質(zhì)和水文地質(zhì)條件都較為復(fù)雜。深厚淤泥或淤泥質(zhì)軟土層已成為南沙地區(qū)基礎(chǔ)工程和基坑工程中尤為突出的難題。本文主要針對(duì)南沙地區(qū)軟土特性，緊密結(jié)合該地區(qū)工程實(shí)例，就基坑支護(hù)選型、基坑支護(hù)加固以及基坑支護(hù)優(yōu)化方面展開分析，并提出合理的軟土深基坑工程方案，為南沙地區(qū)同類工程提供參考，主要研究內(nèi)容與成果如下： 1.采用理正軟件計(jì)算分析了南沙某基坑頂部邊坡塌方原因，結(jié)果表明：（1）施工運(yùn)土車輛產(chǎn)生的邊坡頂部超載大大降低了邊坡穩(wěn)定安全系數(shù)；（2）地面積水滲入邊坡表層土后，土體發(fā)生軟化，粘聚力降低，邊坡趨于不安全甚至失穩(wěn)狀態(tài)；（3）基坑土體超挖使支護(hù)結(jié)構(gòu)整體穩(wěn)定安全系數(shù)降低，不滿足規(guī)范要求。 2.對(duì)基坑原重力式水泥土墻支護(hù)方案進(jìn)行了優(yōu)化設(shè)計(jì)，結(jié)果表明：（1）增設(shè)兩排水泥土攪拌樁使水泥土墻寬度達(dá)4.15m時(shí)，支護(hù)結(jié)構(gòu)整體穩(wěn)定安全系數(shù)達(dá)最大值為1.329；（2）提高水泥土墻嵌固深度至11.0m時(shí)，基坑各穩(wěn)定性安全系數(shù)更為均衡；（3）當(dāng)被動(dòng)區(qū)加固體厚度增大時(shí)，支護(hù)結(jié)構(gòu)最大水平位移明顯減小，并在加固體厚度超過4m后趨于穩(wěn)定；（4）頂部邊坡放緩，卸除冗余土體可有效增強(qiáng)基坑支護(hù)穩(wěn)定性。 3.引入了雙排樁支護(hù)方案，并與重力式水泥土墻支護(hù)方案進(jìn)行了對(duì)比，結(jié)果表明：（1）考慮被動(dòng)區(qū)加固土影響時(shí)，雙排樁支護(hù)方案各穩(wěn)定性安全系數(shù)與重力式水泥土支護(hù)方案差別不大；（2）不考慮被動(dòng)區(qū)加固土影響時(shí)，雙排樁支護(hù)方案的抗傾覆穩(wěn)定性、整體穩(wěn)定性均明顯優(yōu)于重力式水泥土墻支護(hù)方案，樁身水平位移、彎矩以及所產(chǎn)生的地表沉降量均遠(yuǎn)小于重力式水泥土墻。
[Abstract]:Nansha is located in the geometric center of Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Macao, and is the core of Guangzhou's future development. The engineering geology and hydrogeological conditions are complicated. The deep silt or silt soft soil has become the most prominent problem in the foundation engineering and foundation pit engineering in Nansha area. This paper mainly focuses on the characteristics of soft soil in Nansha area. Based on the engineering examples in this area, the selection of foundation pit support, the reinforcement of foundation pit and the optimization of foundation pit support are analyzed, and a reasonable project of soft soil deep foundation pit is put forward, which provides a reference for similar projects in Nansha area. The main research contents and results are as follows:. 1. The causes of slope collapse at the top of a foundation pit in Nansha are calculated and analyzed with the help of leveling software. The results show that the overloading on the top of the slope produced by the construction vehicles greatly reduces the slope stability safety factor and the surface water seeps into the surface soil of the slope. The soil softens, the cohesive force decreases, the slope tends to be unsafe or even unstable. The soil overexcavation of the foundation pit reduces the overall stability safety factor of the supporting structure and does not meet the requirements of the code. 2. The optimization design of the original gravity cement-soil wall supporting scheme of foundation pit is carried out. The results show that when two drainage soil mixing piles are added, the width of the cement-soil wall reaches 4.15m. When the stability safety factor of the supporting structure reaches the maximum value of 1.329m) when the cement-soil wall depth is increased to 11.0m, the stability safety factor of the foundation pit is more balanced. (3) when the passive zone and the solid thickness increase, the maximum horizontal displacement of the supporting structure decreases obviously. When the thickness of solid is more than 4 m, the slope at the top of the slope tends to be stabilized, and the stability of foundation pit support can be effectively enhanced by removing the redundant soil. 3. The double row pile support scheme is introduced and compared with the gravity cement-soil wall support scheme. The results show that when considering the influence of the reinforced soil in the passive zone, When the stability safety factor of double-row pile support scheme is not different from gravity cement-soil support scheme, the overturning stability of double-row pile support scheme is not considered when the influence of passive zone reinforcement is not considered. The overall stability is obviously superior to that of gravity cement-soil wall, and the horizontal displacement, bending moment and surface settlement of the pile are much smaller than those of gravity cement soil wall.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：TU753;TU714

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王振信;;軟土地層深基坑開挖的支護(hù)技術(shù)綜述[J];地下工程與隧道;1989年02期

2 程國太,黃錫璋,胡井友;噴錨網(wǎng)支護(hù)在軟土深基坑應(yīng)用[J];福建建筑;1995年02期

3 朱鴻鵠;陳曉平;張芳枝;黃麗娟;;南沙軟土固結(jié)變形特性試驗(yàn)研究[J];工程勘察;2005年01期

4 劉勇健;李彰明;伍四明;吳加武;;南沙地區(qū)軟土物理力學(xué)性質(zhì)指標(biāo)與微結(jié)構(gòu)參數(shù)的統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[J];廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

5 李子生;淺談軟土深基坑支護(hù)結(jié)構(gòu)型式選擇的基本方法與原則[J];廣東土木與建筑;1996年01期

6 張麗娟;李彰明;楊雪強(qiáng);;動(dòng)力排水固結(jié)加固后南沙港區(qū)軟土次固結(jié)性狀試驗(yàn)研究[J];中國港灣建設(shè);2011年05期

7 溫耀霖，潘健，吳湘興;珠江三角洲軟土的微觀結(jié)構(gòu)與力學(xué)特性[J];華南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);1995年01期

8 蔡袁強(qiáng),王立忠,陳云敏,吳世明,夏元芳;軟土地基深基坑開挖中雙排樁式圍護(hù)結(jié)構(gòu)應(yīng)用實(shí)錄[J];建筑結(jié)構(gòu)學(xué)報(bào);1997年04期

9 蔡袁強(qiáng),阮連法,吳世明,陳云敏;軟粘土地基基坑開挖中雙排樁式圍護(hù)結(jié)構(gòu)的數(shù)值分析及應(yīng)用[J];建筑結(jié)構(gòu)學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

10 曹福杰;軟土地區(qū)深基坑開挖組合支護(hù)工程實(shí)踐[J];建筑技術(shù);1994年05期

本文編號(hào)：1492957