【摘要】：自改革開放以來,我國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展取得了舉世矚目的成果,從2005年經(jīng)濟(jì)總量世界排名第六位到2010年第二位僅僅只有五年時(shí)間。在這快速發(fā)展的背后卻暴露了資源過度消耗、環(huán)境重度污染、區(qū)域發(fā)展失衡、收入差距擴(kuò)大等等問題,可見現(xiàn)有的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式已不可持續(xù),轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式的命題提出成為必然。 回顧經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),改革開放以來學(xué)術(shù)界和政府對(duì)該問題的研究就從未停止,在不同時(shí)期還出現(xiàn)過幾次較大規(guī)模的討論,最終面對(duì)如何轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式也不約而同地選擇了“集約型增長(zhǎng)”的表述。為何多次的研究討論和達(dá)成共同結(jié)論更迭出現(xiàn)?這就需要對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行深入分析,而這也正是本文研究的出發(fā)點(diǎn)。本文的主要工作有： 第一部分,提出經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變研究的必要性,并對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變研究進(jìn)行梳理并劃分為“五次大討論”,從時(shí)間維度上體現(xiàn)研究的連續(xù)性,從內(nèi)容上體現(xiàn)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式內(nèi)涵認(rèn)識(shí)的不斷完善。 第二部分,對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式的涵義進(jìn)行界定,探索“集約型增長(zhǎng)”表述背后的分歧所在,并在此基礎(chǔ)上確定對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變的方向選擇,再以方向選擇作為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對(duì)以往對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變所構(gòu)建的指標(biāo)體系進(jìn)行回顧。 第三部分,在“五次大討論”劃分的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合新時(shí)期經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展特點(diǎn),借鑒以往經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變指標(biāo)體系研究成果,分別從經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)效率、經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)環(huán)境、經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)、經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)觀念五個(gè)方面構(gòu)建指標(biāo)體系,設(shè)置11項(xiàng)二級(jí)指標(biāo)和23級(jí)三級(jí)指標(biāo)。 第四部分,收集各省區(qū)相應(yīng)指標(biāo)樣本數(shù)據(jù),利用功效系數(shù)法對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行無量綱化處理,利用變異系數(shù)法確定各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重,最終得到各省區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變的綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分。 第五部分,通過對(duì)各省區(qū)的綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分以及各分項(xiàng)指標(biāo)的綜合得分進(jìn)行分析,并提出相應(yīng)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economic development has made remarkable achievements, from 2005 to 2010, the world ranked sixth to the second only five years. Behind this rapid development, it has exposed the problems of excessive consumption of resources, severe environmental pollution, imbalance of regional development, widening income gap and so on. It can be seen that the existing mode of economic growth has become unsustainable, and the proposition of changing the mode of economic growth has become inevitable. Reviewing the research on the transformation of economic growth mode, it is found that the academic and government research on this issue has never stopped since the reform and opening up, and there have been several large-scale discussions in different periods. Finally, the expression of "intensive growth" has been chosen in the face of how to change the mode of economic growth. Why have there been many studies, discussions and common conclusions? This needs to carry on the thorough analysis to the economic growth mode transformation connotation, and this is also the starting point of this paper. The main work of this paper is as follows: in the first part, the necessity of the research on the transformation of economic growth mode is put forward, and the research on the transformation of economic growth mode is sorted out and divided into "five great discussions", which embodies the continuity of the research from the time dimension and the continuous improvement of the connotation of economic growth mode in terms of content. The second part defines the meaning of economic growth mode, explores the differences behind the expression of "intensive growth", and on this basis determines the direction choice of the transformation of economic growth mode, and then reviews the index system constructed in the past on the basis of direction selection. In the third part, on the basis of the division of "five great discussions", combined with the characteristics of economic development in the new period, drawing lessons from the previous research results of the index system of the transformation of economic growth mode, the index system is constructed from five aspects: economic growth efficiency, economic growth environment, economic growth structure, economic growth goal and economic growth concept, and 11 secondary indicators and 23 grade three-level indicators are set up. In the fourth part, we collect the corresponding index sample data of each province, use the efficiency coefficient method to deal with the data dimensionless, use the coefficient of variation method to determine the weight of each index, and finally get the comprehensive evaluation score of the transformation of the economic growth mode of each province and region. The fifth part analyzes the comprehensive evaluation score of each province and district and the comprehensive score of each sub-index, and puts forward the corresponding policy suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F127;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葛霖生;經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系芻議[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;1996年08期

2 張立英;關(guān)于我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變問題的討論綜述[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;1996年10期

3 崔援民，武建奇;“粗放”和“集約”:若干理論思考[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1996年01期

4 樊綱;;中國(guó)仍然需要投資的增長(zhǎng)[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2007年01期

5 劉世錦;;正確理解“新型工業(yè)化”[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年11期

6 金碚;;科學(xué)發(fā)展觀與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年05期

7 陸百甫;實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變是我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略性選擇[J];管理世界;1995年06期

8 周叔蓮;;轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式和深化國(guó)有企業(yè)改革[J];管理世界;1996年01期

9 林毅夫;蘇劍;;論我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式的轉(zhuǎn)換[J];管理世界;2007年11期

10 呂鐵,周叔蓮;中國(guó)的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變[J];管理世界;1999年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2505305