滬港貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系比較研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-28 08:19
【摘要】：本文從上海、香港的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)現(xiàn)狀出發(fā),選用相關(guān)指標(biāo),比較兩地產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)的發(fā)展特征。進(jìn)一步的,通過建立數(shù)學(xué)模型,研究產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)的相互關(guān)系。 首先,本文第二、三章分別就兩個(gè)地方的貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了比較。研究結(jié)果表明：第一、上海、香港的貿(mào)易商品結(jié)構(gòu)類似,但是貿(mào)易方式結(jié)構(gòu)有較大差異。第二,產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)比較結(jié)果顯示：(1)香港的產(chǎn)業(yè)高度化程度優(yōu)于上海,主要表現(xiàn)在香港的第三產(chǎn)業(yè)比重高于上海；(2)霍夫曼工業(yè)化指數(shù)計(jì)算結(jié)果表明,上海已經(jīng)處于工業(yè)化程度的第四階段,而香港還處于第二階段。第三、由上述結(jié)果推斷,上海為“腹地型”貿(mào)易中心城市,香港為“轉(zhuǎn)口型”貿(mào)易中心城市。 然后,本文選用錢納里(1975)提出的數(shù)學(xué)模型,對(duì)該模型進(jìn)行了必要的修正,以對(duì)上海、香港產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)互動(dòng)關(guān)系予以實(shí)證分析。結(jié)果表明,上海、香港的要素稟賦是有所區(qū)別的,上海的要素稟賦主要集中于勞動(dòng)力資源和工業(yè)化體系,香港的要素稟賦則在于其優(yōu)越的地理位置。但是,這些結(jié)論無法系統(tǒng)地反應(yīng)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)的關(guān)系,因而需要進(jìn)一步從整體上對(duì)兩個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)綜合效應(yīng)的互動(dòng)關(guān)系進(jìn)行研究。 本文第五章構(gòu)建了上海、香港產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)的結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化指數(shù)體系。其中,產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化指數(shù)選擇結(jié)構(gòu)高度化指數(shù)和結(jié)構(gòu)協(xié)調(diào)度指數(shù)為目標(biāo)指數(shù)；貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化指數(shù)則包括了商品結(jié)構(gòu)、方式結(jié)構(gòu)、區(qū)域結(jié)構(gòu)和服務(wù)貿(mào)易比重四個(gè)緯度的指標(biāo)。然后,使用灰靶理論計(jì)算出貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化指數(shù)的靶心度。最后,運(yùn)用Johansen協(xié)整檢驗(yàn)和格蘭杰因果關(guān)系檢驗(yàn)對(duì)兩個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)綜合指數(shù)的變化關(guān)系進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn),進(jìn)而比較研究?jī)傻禺a(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)綜合效應(yīng)。結(jié)果表明,出口導(dǎo)向型戰(zhàn)略引起上海產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)的關(guān)系調(diào)整,而香港則通過調(diào)整產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu),正在從“去工業(yè)化”進(jìn)程中走出來。這個(gè)結(jié)論很好的驗(yàn)證了之前通過各個(gè)方面數(shù)據(jù)所做出的推測(cè)。 第六章中,以上述研究成果為基礎(chǔ),構(gòu)建了產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系的調(diào)整模型,并總結(jié)了滬港兩地在產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與貿(mào)易機(jī)構(gòu)調(diào)整過程中存在的四個(gè)不同之處：(1)先導(dǎo)政策不同；(2)主導(dǎo)性貿(mào)易方式不同；(3)生產(chǎn)要素的重新配置對(duì)兩地的出口貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)的影響途徑不同；(4)生產(chǎn)要素配置對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整的響應(yīng)路徑不同。進(jìn)而通過考察香港在處理產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系中的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與教訓(xùn),并結(jié)合之間的研究成果,提出上海優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系的四點(diǎn)建議：(1)以產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化為核心目標(biāo),防止貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的反制；(2)提高生產(chǎn)要素配置對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整的響應(yīng)能力；(3)合理配置貿(mào)易方式結(jié)構(gòu),推進(jìn)三次產(chǎn)業(yè)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展；(4)培育潛在要素稟賦,預(yù)防結(jié)構(gòu)失衡。
[Abstract]:Based on the present situation of industrial structure and trade structure in Shanghai and Hong Kong, this paper compares the development characteristics of industrial structure and trade structure between Shanghai and Hong Kong. Furthermore, the relationship between industrial structure and trade structure is studied by establishing mathematical model. Firstly, the second and third chapters compare the present situation of trade structure and industrial structure of the two places. The results show that: first, the structure of trade commodities in Shanghai and Hong Kong is similar, but the structure of trade mode is quite different. Second, the results of industrial structure comparison show that: (1) the degree of industrial upgrading in Hong Kong is higher than that in Shanghai, mainly in the proportion of tertiary industry in Hong Kong is higher than that in Shanghai; (2) the results of Hoffman industrialization Index calculation show that Shanghai is in the fourth stage of industrialization, while Hong Kong is in the second stage. Thirdly, it is inferred from the above results that Shanghai is a "hinterland" trade center city and Hong Kong is a "entrepot" trade center city. Then, this paper selects the mathematical model proposed by Chennari (1975), and makes a necessary revision to the model to make an empirical analysis of the interaction between industrial structure and trade structure in Shanghai and Hong Kong. The results show that the factor endowments of Shanghai and Hong Kong are different, that of Shanghai is mainly concentrated on labor resources and industrialization system, and that of Hong Kong lies in its superior geographical position. However, these conclusions can not systematically reflect the relationship between the industrial structure and the trade structure, so it is necessary to further study the interaction between the two structures as a whole. The fifth chapter constructs the index system of industrial structure and trade structure of Shanghai and Hong Kong. Among them, the industrial structure optimization index selects the structural high-grade index and the structural coordination index as the target index, and the trade structure optimization index includes the index of the commodity structure, the mode structure, the regional structure and the proportion of service trade. Then, the target center of trade structure optimization index is calculated by grey target theory. Finally, Johansen cointegration test and Granger causality test are used to test the relationship between the two structural composite indices, and then compare the industrial structure and trade structure of the two places. The results show that the export-oriented strategy leads to the adjustment of the relationship between the industrial structure and the trade structure of Shanghai, while Hong Kong is emerging from the process of "deindustrialization" through the adjustment of the industrial structure. This conclusion is very good to verify the previous data from various aspects of the speculation. In the sixth chapter, based on the above research results, we construct the adjustment model of the relationship between industrial structure and trade structure, and summarize the four differences between Shanghai and Hong Kong in the process of industrial structure and trade organization adjustment: (1) different guiding policies; (2) the dominant trade mode is different; (3) the reconfiguration of production factors has different influence on the export trade structure of both places; (4) the response path of production factor allocation to industrial structure adjustment is different. Then, by examining the experience and lessons of Hong Kong in dealing with the relationship between industrial structure and trade structure, and combining the research results between them, Four suggestions are put forward to optimize the relationship between industrial structure and trade structure in Shanghai: (1) taking industrial structure optimization as the core goal to prevent the trade structure from counteracting the industrial structure; (2) improving the response ability of production factor allocation to the adjustment of industrial structure; (3) reasonable allocation of trade mode structure, promotion of coordinated development of three industries, (4) cultivation of potential factor endowment and prevention of structural imbalance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F727;F127;F224
本文編號(hào)：2149485
[Abstract]:Based on the present situation of industrial structure and trade structure in Shanghai and Hong Kong, this paper compares the development characteristics of industrial structure and trade structure between Shanghai and Hong Kong. Furthermore, the relationship between industrial structure and trade structure is studied by establishing mathematical model. Firstly, the second and third chapters compare the present situation of trade structure and industrial structure of the two places. The results show that: first, the structure of trade commodities in Shanghai and Hong Kong is similar, but the structure of trade mode is quite different. Second, the results of industrial structure comparison show that: (1) the degree of industrial upgrading in Hong Kong is higher than that in Shanghai, mainly in the proportion of tertiary industry in Hong Kong is higher than that in Shanghai; (2) the results of Hoffman industrialization Index calculation show that Shanghai is in the fourth stage of industrialization, while Hong Kong is in the second stage. Thirdly, it is inferred from the above results that Shanghai is a "hinterland" trade center city and Hong Kong is a "entrepot" trade center city. Then, this paper selects the mathematical model proposed by Chennari (1975), and makes a necessary revision to the model to make an empirical analysis of the interaction between industrial structure and trade structure in Shanghai and Hong Kong. The results show that the factor endowments of Shanghai and Hong Kong are different, that of Shanghai is mainly concentrated on labor resources and industrialization system, and that of Hong Kong lies in its superior geographical position. However, these conclusions can not systematically reflect the relationship between the industrial structure and the trade structure, so it is necessary to further study the interaction between the two structures as a whole. The fifth chapter constructs the index system of industrial structure and trade structure of Shanghai and Hong Kong. Among them, the industrial structure optimization index selects the structural high-grade index and the structural coordination index as the target index, and the trade structure optimization index includes the index of the commodity structure, the mode structure, the regional structure and the proportion of service trade. Then, the target center of trade structure optimization index is calculated by grey target theory. Finally, Johansen cointegration test and Granger causality test are used to test the relationship between the two structural composite indices, and then compare the industrial structure and trade structure of the two places. The results show that the export-oriented strategy leads to the adjustment of the relationship between the industrial structure and the trade structure of Shanghai, while Hong Kong is emerging from the process of "deindustrialization" through the adjustment of the industrial structure. This conclusion is very good to verify the previous data from various aspects of the speculation. In the sixth chapter, based on the above research results, we construct the adjustment model of the relationship between industrial structure and trade structure, and summarize the four differences between Shanghai and Hong Kong in the process of industrial structure and trade organization adjustment: (1) different guiding policies; (2) the dominant trade mode is different; (3) the reconfiguration of production factors has different influence on the export trade structure of both places; (4) the response path of production factor allocation to industrial structure adjustment is different. Then, by examining the experience and lessons of Hong Kong in dealing with the relationship between industrial structure and trade structure, and combining the research results between them, Four suggestions are put forward to optimize the relationship between industrial structure and trade structure in Shanghai: (1) taking industrial structure optimization as the core goal to prevent the trade structure from counteracting the industrial structure; (2) improving the response ability of production factor allocation to the adjustment of industrial structure; (3) reasonable allocation of trade mode structure, promotion of coordinated development of three industries, (4) cultivation of potential factor endowment and prevention of structural imbalance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F727;F127;F224
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙沖;劉向麗;于左;;FDI流入的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)我國(guó)出口貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)的影響[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2010年07期
2 顧清峰;;競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)理論對(duì)我國(guó)貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)的重新審視[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期
3 周建華;;對(duì)外貿(mào)易、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)——基于中國(guó)和印度的比較[J];東南亞南亞研究;2010年04期
4 尹翔碩;中國(guó)出口制成品結(jié)構(gòu)與制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)結(jié)構(gòu)差異的分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;1997年04期
5 隋月紅;趙振華;;出口貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)的形成機(jī)理:基于我國(guó)1980-2005年的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2008年03期
6 劉兵權(quán);彭菲婭;;超額外匯儲(chǔ)備、貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2008年07期
7 林毅夫,孫希芳;經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的比較優(yōu)勢(shì)戰(zhàn)略理論——兼評(píng)《對(duì)中國(guó)外貿(mào)戰(zhàn)略與貿(mào)易政策的評(píng)論》[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2003年06期
8 文東偉;冼國(guó)明;馬靜;;FDI、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷與中國(guó)的出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力[J];管理世界;2009年04期
9 王冉冉;;外貿(mào)結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變的互動(dòng)關(guān)系探討[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期
10 黃菁;楊三根;;中國(guó)加工貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)影響因素的實(shí)證分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年01期
，本文編號(hào)：2149485
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/zhongguojingjilunwen/2149485.html
最近更新
教材專著
