發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-22 10:11

  本文選題：主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇 + 層次分析法��； 參考：《北京郵電大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：區(qū)域主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)是那些在區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)中占比大、經(jīng)濟(jì)效益好、創(chuàng)新能力突出、市場(chǎng)前景廣闊同時(shí)與上下游產(chǎn)業(yè)關(guān)聯(lián)性強(qiáng)的產(chǎn)業(yè)群,是區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的主要?jiǎng)恿�。目�?許多中外學(xué)者對(duì)主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇問(wèn)題已經(jīng)進(jìn)行了大量的理論和實(shí)證研究,并已在主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇的基準(zhǔn)和指標(biāo)體系的研究上取得了很多成果。但是,鑒于區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)具有多樣性和復(fù)雜性的特點(diǎn),不同的學(xué)者在對(duì)具體區(qū)域進(jìn)行主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇的過(guò)程中選取了不同的基準(zhǔn)和指標(biāo),從而導(dǎo)致主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇的結(jié)論不能達(dá)成廣泛共識(shí)。因此,本文將主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)的選擇基準(zhǔn)及其方法作為對(duì)象,研究各個(gè)區(qū)域在選擇主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)過(guò)程中采用何種基準(zhǔn)、指標(biāo)和選擇方法。 選擇主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)的前提是界定與主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)相近的概念,以避免因混淆概念而導(dǎo)致的主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇基準(zhǔn)偏離。本文在系統(tǒng)總結(jié)了國(guó)內(nèi)外主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇研究理論基礎(chǔ)上,確定遼寧省主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇的五個(gè)基準(zhǔn)：比較優(yōu)勢(shì)基準(zhǔn)、產(chǎn)業(yè)關(guān)聯(lián)基準(zhǔn)、技術(shù)進(jìn)步基準(zhǔn)、市場(chǎng)潛力基準(zhǔn)、可持續(xù)基準(zhǔn)。文章分析遼寧省產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的現(xiàn)狀,探討遼寧省產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)和效益,指明遼寧省產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)中存在的四大問(wèn)題：1.三次產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演變不合理。2.第二產(chǎn)業(yè)大而不強(qiáng)。3.第三產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展落后。4.產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展不均衡,產(chǎn)業(yè)關(guān)聯(lián)度低。最后在綜合遼寧省產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展客觀現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上采用綜合指數(shù)法選擇遼寧省主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè),并最終確定遼寧省應(yīng)該重點(diǎn)優(yōu)先發(fā)展的主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)：石油加工、煉焦及核燃料加工業(yè),交通運(yùn)輸設(shè)備制造業(yè),通信設(shè)備、計(jì)算機(jī)及其他電子設(shè)備制造業(yè),交通運(yùn)輸及倉(cāng)儲(chǔ)業(yè)、郵電業(yè)。
[Abstract]:Regional leading industries are the industrial clusters with large proportion in regional economic structure, good economic benefit, outstanding innovation ability, broad market prospect and strong correlation with upstream and downstream industries, and are the main driving force of regional economic growth. At present, many Chinese and foreign scholars have done a lot of theoretical and empirical research on the choice of leading industry, and have made a lot of achievements in the research of the benchmark and index system of leading industry selection. However, in view of the diversity and complexity of regional economy, different scholars choose different benchmarks and indicators in the process of choosing leading industries in specific regions. As a result, the conclusion of leading industry selection can not reach a broad consensus. Therefore, this paper takes the selection benchmark and its method of leading industry as the object, and studies what kind of benchmark, index and selection method are used in the process of selecting leading industry in each region. The premise of choosing the leading industry is to define the concept similar to the leading industry so as to avoid the deviation of the leading industry selection benchmark caused by the confusion of the concept. On the basis of systematically summarizing the theory of leading industry selection at home and abroad, this paper determines five benchmarks of leading industry selection in Liaoning Province: comparative advantage benchmark, industrial association benchmark, technological progress benchmark, market potential benchmark and sustainable benchmark. This paper analyzes the present situation of Liaoning's industrial structure, probes into the internal structure and benefits of Liaoning's industry, and points out four major problems in Liaoning's industrial structure: 1. Three industrial structure evolution unreasonable. 2. The second industry is big but not strong. The development of the tertiary industry lags behind. The industrial development is not balanced, the industrial correlation degree is low. Finally, on the basis of synthesizing the present situation of Liaoning's industrial development, adopting the comprehensive index method to select Liaoning's leading industries, and finally determining the leading industries that Liaoning should give priority to: oil processing, coking and nuclear fuel processing industries. Transportation equipment manufacturing, communications equipment, computer and other electronic equipment manufacturing, transportation and storage industry, post and telecommunications industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京郵電大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F127;F279.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王敏;地區(qū)主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇的AHP模型及其應(yīng)用[J];重慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2001年04期

2 劉克利,彭水軍,陳富華;主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)的評(píng)價(jià)選擇模型及其應(yīng)用[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2003年03期

3 趙福厚;;基于層次分析法的外商直接投資中主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)分析[J];工業(yè)工程;2010年04期

4 齊志強(qiáng);;中國(guó)主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)構(gòu)成與可持續(xù)發(fā)展能力演變研究——基于投入產(chǎn)出與可持續(xù)發(fā)展視角[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年03期

5 劉希宋,楊東奇;生產(chǎn)函數(shù)與技術(shù)進(jìn)步測(cè)定[J];哈爾濱工程大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

6 馬濤;秦沛;;基于新型工業(yè)化的黑龍江省產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)分析[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

7 李博;胡進(jìn);;中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化升級(jí)的測(cè)度和比較分析[J];管理科學(xué);2008年02期

8 連成順;;淺論中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化升級(jí)存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年09期

9 梁靖廷,楊忠誠(chéng),修震威;高新區(qū)主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇指標(biāo)體系研究[J];科技管理研究;2002年06期

10 陳海漢;馮南平;梁魏;;安徽省主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)的選擇與發(fā)展方向[J];科技管理研究;2012年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄧印;基于產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的遼寧省產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1921635