本文選題：國際分工地位 + 產(chǎn)能過剩�。� 參考：《中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來,中國發(fā)生的最重要的變化之一即為在國際分工體系的融入程度不斷提高,經(jīng)濟(jì)的外向性進(jìn)一步加深,產(chǎn)業(yè)的出口導(dǎo)向性質(zhì)也進(jìn)一步形成。這一現(xiàn)象對中國的經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)產(chǎn)生了重要的影響,也最終導(dǎo)致了部分產(chǎn)業(yè)形成了產(chǎn)能過剩的現(xiàn)實(shí)。隨著產(chǎn)品內(nèi)國際分工成為主流分工形式,中國在產(chǎn)品內(nèi)分工中仍然處于價(jià)值鏈低端的生產(chǎn)地位。這種低端的生產(chǎn)地位主要表現(xiàn)在:發(fā)達(dá)國家憑借其技術(shù)優(yōu)勢掌握產(chǎn)品內(nèi)國際分工的高附加值工序,而中國的大量產(chǎn)能則集中于低附加值工序,形成惡性競爭和低水平重復(fù)建設(shè)的態(tài)勢。本文的切入點(diǎn)在于對后發(fā)國家的工業(yè)化階段的分析,認(rèn)為后發(fā)國家進(jìn)入工業(yè)化中后期之后有可能將會遇到產(chǎn)能過剩的問題。這一問題的理論支持有雁行模式和產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度轉(zhuǎn)移理論,同時(shí)也可以通過先發(fā)國家和后發(fā)國家企業(yè)之間就創(chuàng)新進(jìn)行的博弈進(jìn)行分析。通過產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度轉(zhuǎn)移實(shí)現(xiàn)本國在國際分工中地位的提升則可以非常有效地解決這一問題:日本正是在完成了工業(yè)化后期階段的過渡,產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移下的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級和國際分工地位的提升最后實(shí)現(xiàn)了產(chǎn)能過剩問題的解決。在理論闡述之外,本文還將對不同行業(yè)進(jìn)行分析,建立對于行業(yè)的國際分工地位和產(chǎn)能過剩程度關(guān)系的計(jì)量模型,衡量國際分工地位對于某一行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過剩的影響程度。需要注意的是,本文結(jié)論建立在進(jìn)入工業(yè)化后期的后發(fā)國家的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)上,并不試圖將這一結(jié)論推廣到所有國家。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, one of the most important changes that has taken place in China is the increasing degree of integration in the international division of labor system, the deepening of the extroversion of the economy and the further formation of the export-oriented nature of the industry. This phenomenon has an important impact on the economic structure of China, and finally leads to the reality of overcapacity in some industries. With the international division of labor within products becoming the mainstream division of labor, China is still in the low end of the value chain in the intra-product division of labor. This low-end production position is mainly manifested in: developed countries, by virtue of their technological advantages, have mastered the high value-added processes in the international division of labor within products, while China has concentrated a large amount of production capacity on low-value-added processes. To form a vicious competition and low level of repeated construction situation. The breakthrough point of this paper lies in the analysis of the industrialization stage of the latecomer countries, and thinks that the late developed countries may encounter the problem of overcapacity after entering the middle and late stage of industrialization. The theory of this problem supports the model of wild goose travel and the theory of industrial gradient transfer. At the same time, it can also be analyzed by the game of innovation between the first-developed country and the late-developed country. This problem can be solved very effectively by realizing the upgrading of national status in the international division of labor through industrial gradient transfer: Japan has just completed the transition in the late stage of industrialization. The upgrading of industrial structure and the promotion of international division of labor under the circumstances of industrial transfer have finally solved the problem of overcapacity. In addition to the theoretical analysis, this paper will also analyze different industries, establish a measurement model of the relationship between the international division of labor and the degree of overcapacity, and measure the impact of the international division of labor on an industry's overcapacity. It should be noted that the conclusion of this paper is based on the empirical evidence of the late industrialized countries and does not attempt to extend this conclusion to all countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F113

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王立國;高越青;;基于技術(shù)進(jìn)步視角的產(chǎn)能過剩問題研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2012年02期

2 徐幼民;技術(shù)進(jìn)步條件下的資本理論[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2005年01期

3 蔣伏心;林江;;晉升錦標(biāo)賽、財(cái)政周期性與經(jīng)濟(jì)波動——中國改革開放以來的經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年07期

4 田文;產(chǎn)品內(nèi)貿(mào)易模式的決定與利益分配研究[J];國際商務(wù).對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

5 王允貴;利用外商投資中“以市場換技術(shù)”剖析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;1996年09期

6 陳炳才;外商直接投資與中國技術(shù)進(jìn)步的關(guān)系——兼談如何實(shí)現(xiàn)“以市場換技術(shù)”[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;1998年01期

7 張友仁;出口貿(mào)易過度競爭的產(chǎn)業(yè)組織分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2003年05期

8 李曉鐘;張小蒂;;我國得自外商直接投資的比較利益分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2006年11期

9 劉建江;楊細(xì)珍;;產(chǎn)品內(nèi)分工視角下中美貿(mào)易失衡中的貿(mào)易利益研究[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2011年08期

10 平新喬;;市場換來技術(shù)了嗎?[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)評論;2007年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 鄧志新;市場扭曲條件下的出口貿(mào)易過度競爭與 “貧困化增長”陷阱[D];上海社會科學(xué)院;2007年

2 江飛濤;中國鋼鐵工業(yè)產(chǎn)能過剩問題研究[D];中南大學(xué);2008年

3 李鑫;中國上市公司過度投資行為研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1899885