本文選題：戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè) + 產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚��； 參考：《浙江工商大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：自2007年美國次貸危機以來,全球經(jīng)濟迅速跌入谷底,由此引發(fā)的歐債危機如今對全球經(jīng)濟造成嚴重影響。在經(jīng)濟全球化的環(huán)境下,如何進行新一輪的產(chǎn)業(yè)供需結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整成為全球經(jīng)濟體面對的共同問題。自2009年11月3日溫家寶在《讓科技引領(lǐng)中國可持續(xù)發(fā)展》的重要講話中首次明確提出了戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的概念以來,關(guān)于我國戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的相關(guān)研究層出不窮。其中如何選擇和發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)成為各地區(qū)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的熱點話題。本文根據(jù)周晶在《戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)統(tǒng)計標準研究》中提出的戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇標準,選取2010年規(guī)模以上制造業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)、2008年經(jīng)濟普查數(shù)據(jù),2011年第三產(chǎn)業(yè)統(tǒng)計年鑒中的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)進行相關(guān)篩選及處理,展開對我國戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的研究。 本文首先對2010年戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的基本現(xiàn)狀進行統(tǒng)計性描述,計算各個行業(yè)的發(fā)展規(guī)模,并與2004、2008年數(shù)據(jù)進行對比分析。然后對戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的集聚水平進行測度,分別從行業(yè)角度和地區(qū)角度測算行業(yè)集中度與地區(qū)區(qū)位商,并對戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)做DEA效率分析。實證結(jié)論：(1)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的在國民經(jīng)濟總體規(guī)模中占比��；(2)七大分行業(yè)間發(fā)展規(guī)模差距較大,但處于縮小的趨勢；(3)七大行業(yè)的區(qū)位優(yōu)勢各不相同,節(jié)能環(huán)保產(chǎn)業(yè)、新一代信息技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)和高端裝備制造業(yè)區(qū)位優(yōu)勢集中在東部地區(qū),生物產(chǎn)業(yè)、新能源產(chǎn)業(yè)、新材料產(chǎn)業(yè)、新能源汽車產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)位優(yōu)勢集中在中西部地區(qū)；(4)七大行業(yè)集聚水平并不高,其細分行業(yè)中個別行業(yè)表現(xiàn)出強勢的集聚水平；(5)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)制造業(yè)集聚水平普遍高于服務業(yè)；(6)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)總體區(qū)位熵呈現(xiàn)出一個由東至西,由沿海到內(nèi)陸,區(qū)位優(yōu)勢逐漸減弱再增強的倒U型發(fā)展趨勢。制造業(yè)集聚程度更高,而服務業(yè)分布更為均衡；(7)戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)總體效率測度結(jié)果表明：純技術(shù)效率低下是制約戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)效率提高的主要因素。最后嘗試對戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)進行空間相關(guān)性分析,根據(jù)檢驗結(jié)果對戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)制造業(yè)與服務業(yè)分別進行空間計量統(tǒng)計建模。建模結(jié)果表明,資本投入與技術(shù)水平對制造業(yè)與服務業(yè)地區(qū)集聚水平均存在正向影響,且它們對戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)服務業(yè)的影響強于制造業(yè)。
[Abstract]:Since the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis in 2007, the global economy has quickly bottomed out, leading to a European debt crisis that now has a serious impact on the global economy. Under the environment of economic globalization, how to adjust the industrial supply and demand structure in a new round has become a common problem facing the global economy. Since Wen Jiabao put forward the concept of strategic emerging industry for the first time in his important speech "Let Science and Technology lead China's Sustainable Development" on November 3, 2009, there has been an endless stream of research on strategic emerging industry in China. How to select and develop strategic emerging industries has become a hot topic of regional economic development. According to the selection criteria of strategic emerging industries proposed by Zhou Jing in the Statistical Standards of Strategic emerging Industries, This paper selects the manufacturing data above the scale of 2010, the economic census data of 2008 and the relevant data of the third industry statistical yearbook of 2011 to carry on the relevant screening and processing, and carries on the research to the strategic emerging industry of our country. In this paper, the basic status of strategic emerging industries in 2010 is first statistically described, and the scale of development of each industry is calculated, and compared with the data of 2004 and 2008. Then it measures the agglomeration level of strategic emerging industries, calculates the industry concentration and regional location quotient from the angle of industry and region, and analyzes the DEA efficiency of strategic emerging industries. Empirical conclusion: (1) the proportion of strategic emerging industries in the overall national economic scale is 2%) there is a large gap in the development scale among the seven major industries, but the seven major industries have different regional advantages, and the energy conservation and environmental protection industries are different. The regional advantages of the new generation of information technology industries and high-end equipment manufacturing industries are concentrated in the eastern region, the biological industry, the new energy industry, the new material industry, The regional advantages of the new energy automobile industry are concentrated in the central and western regions of China.) the level of agglomeration of the seven major industries is not high. Individual industries in its subdivision show a strong level of agglomeration. (5) the level of agglomeration of manufacturing industries in strategic emerging industries is generally higher than that in service industries (6) the overall location entropy of strategic emerging industries presents a pattern from east to west, from coast to interior. The position advantage gradually weakens and strengthens the inverted U-type development trend. The result shows that the low efficiency of pure technology is the main factor restricting the improvement of the efficiency of strategic emerging industries. Finally, it tries to analyze the spatial correlation of strategic emerging industries, and according to the test results, carries on the spatial econometric statistical modeling of strategic emerging industries manufacturing industry and service industry respectively. The results show that both capital input and technology level have positive effects on the regional agglomeration level of manufacturing and service industries, and they have a stronger impact on strategic emerging industries than manufacturing industries.
【學位授予單位】：浙江工商大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F279.1;F124;F224

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周慧;曹廣喜;;經(jīng)濟集聚與經(jīng)濟增長的空間計量分析——來自江蘇的證據(jù)[J];當代財經(jīng);2010年09期

2 吳玉鳴,徐建華;中國區(qū)域經(jīng)濟增長集聚的空間統(tǒng)計分析[J];地理科學;2004年06期

3 陳良文;楊開忠;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚、市場結(jié)構(gòu)與生產(chǎn)率——基于中國省份制造業(yè)面板數(shù)據(jù)的實證研究[J];地理科學;2008年03期

4 應龍根,寧越敏;空間數(shù)據(jù):性質(zhì)、影響和分析方法[J];地球科學進展;2005年01期

5 歐陽\，

本文編號：1790161