本文選題：產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈　切入點：技術(shù)創(chuàng)新　出處：《武漢理工大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟全球化和知識經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展背景下,國家、區(qū)域和企業(yè)間的競爭已體現(xiàn)為產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈之間的競爭。目前我國各地區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈發(fā)展存在著一些問題,如產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈不完善,產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈斷環(huán)、孤環(huán)較多,產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力不足等問題。本文運用經(jīng)濟學、系統(tǒng)學、管理學、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新理論、產(chǎn)業(yè)集群理論等相關(guān)理論,采取了文獻綜述法、理論研究方法和實踐研究方法、實證分析等分析方法,研究了產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的模式及其政府行為。這一方面彌補了產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新模式理論上的空白之處,另一方面對政府制定產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展政策、企業(yè)制定發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略等具有一定的實踐指導意義。產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新涵蓋了從知識創(chuàng)新、研究開發(fā)、生產(chǎn)開發(fā)到市場開發(fā)、技術(shù)擴散的一系列過程,主要通過市場需求拉動機制、技術(shù)推動機制和傳導機制來實現(xiàn)。該過程具有復雜性和自組織性、市場導向性和政策誘導性、高風險性和高收益性、傳遞性和累積性的特點,不同于其他企業(yè)層次或國家層次的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新活動。產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的模式可以分為產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新模式、產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟模式和重大科技專項三種。每種模式都以其獨特的優(yōu)勢促進產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新。企業(yè)是產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的主體,但政府也發(fā)揮著重要作用,包括宏觀調(diào)整、政策引導、協(xié)調(diào)管理監(jiān)督等。政府行為方式主要包括經(jīng)濟政策、法律法規(guī)、科技及服務(wù)和文化教育四個方面。在產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的不同環(huán)節(jié)和不同模式中，政府發(fā)揮作用的行為方式、角色有所不同。論文運用進化博弈理論對電動汽車產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的主要三個主體——L游企業(yè)、下游企業(yè)和政府進行了分析,指出產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新長期發(fā)展的趨勢是上下游企業(yè)進行合作創(chuàng)新且政府會介入其中。以武漢市為例,對其產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的三種模式進行了案例分析。最后,論文采用數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析方式評價了武漢市整體技術(shù)創(chuàng)新效率和武漢市高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)細分產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈的技術(shù)效率。與其他城市相比,武漢f市在九個城市中排名第七,技術(shù)效率較低,說明其未來應重點提高技術(shù)資源的配置效率,提高科技成果轉(zhuǎn)化率,增加產(chǎn)出。武漢市部分產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈中電子信息產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈的技術(shù)效率最低。論文進一步分析了武漢市產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新效率低下的原因,提出了政府應充分利用技術(shù)創(chuàng)新資源,提高自主創(chuàng)新能力；提高技術(shù)創(chuàng)新資源的配置效率,強化產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈技術(shù)創(chuàng)新中企業(yè)的主體地位；提高科技成果轉(zhuǎn)化率,增強創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)品的市場競爭力；實施知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略,完善法律法規(guī)；強化政府的服務(wù)職能。
[Abstract]:Under the background of economic globalization and knowledge economy, the competition among countries, regions and enterprises has been reflected in the competition among industrial chains.At present, there are some problems in the development of industrial chain in various regions of China, such as imperfect industrial chain, broken industrial chain, more isolated rings, insufficient technical innovation ability of industrial chain and so on.Based on the relevant theories of economics, systematics, management, technology innovation and industrial cluster, this paper adopts the methods of literature review, theoretical and practical research, empirical analysis, etc.The model and government behavior of technological innovation in industrial chain are studied.On the one hand, it makes up the gap in the theory of industrial chain technological innovation mode, on the other hand, it has some practical significance for the government to formulate industrial development policies and enterprises to formulate development strategies.Technological innovation in industrial chain covers a series of processes from knowledge innovation, research and development, production development to market development, and technology diffusion, which is mainly realized through market demand pulling mechanism, technology promotion mechanism and transmission mechanism.The process is characterized by complexity and self-organization, market orientation and policy guidance, high risk and high profitability, transitivity and accumulation, and is different from other technological innovation activities at the enterprise level or at the national level.The technological innovation model of industrial chain can be divided into three types: industrial cluster innovation mode, industrial technological innovation alliance model and major science and technology project.Each model promotes technological innovation in the industrial chain with its unique advantages.Enterprises are the main body of technological innovation in industrial chain, but the government also plays an important role, including macro-adjustment, policy guidance, coordination management and supervision.Government behavior mainly includes four aspects: economic policy, laws and regulations, science and technology and service, culture and education.In different links and modes of technological innovation in the industrial chain, the role of government is different.In this paper, the evolutionary game theory is used to analyze the three main subjects of technological innovation in the electric vehicle industry chain, namely, L enterprises, downstream enterprises and the government.It is pointed out that the trend of long-term development of technological innovation in industrial chain is cooperative innovation between upstream and downstream enterprises and government intervention.Taking Wuhan City as an example, three models of technological innovation in industrial chain are analyzed.Finally, the paper uses the data envelopment analysis method to evaluate the overall technological innovation efficiency of Wuhan and the technical efficiency of the industrial chain subdivision in the high-tech industry of Wuhan.Compared with other cities, Wuhan f city ranks seventh among the nine cities, and its technical efficiency is low, indicating that it should focus on improving the efficiency of technical resources allocation, increasing the conversion rate of scientific and technological achievements and increasing the output in the future.The technical efficiency of electronic information industry chain is the lowest in some industrial chains of Wuhan.The paper further analyzes the reasons for the low efficiency of technological innovation in Wuhan industrial chain, and puts forward that the government should make full use of technological innovation resources, improve the ability of independent innovation, and improve the efficiency of allocation of technological innovation resources.Strengthen the main position of enterprises in the technological innovation of industrial chain; improve the conversion rate of scientific and technological achievements and enhance the market competitiveness of innovative products; implement the strategy of intellectual property rights, perfect laws and regulations; strengthen the service function of the government.
【學位授予單位】：武漢理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F124

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣國俊,蔣明新;產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈理論及其穩(wěn)定機制研究[J];重慶大學學報(社會科學版);2004年01期

2 劉貴富;;產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈運行機制模型研究[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2007年08期

3 劉貴富;趙英才;;產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈:內(nèi)涵、特性及其表現(xiàn)形式[J];財經(jīng)理論與實踐;2006年03期

4 潘成云;解讀產(chǎn)業(yè)價值鏈——兼析我國新興產(chǎn)業(yè)價值鏈基本特征[J];當代財經(jīng);2001年09期

5 李心芹,李仕明,蘭永;產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈結(jié)構(gòu)類型研究[J];電子科技大學學報(社科版);2004年04期

6 鄭學益;構(gòu)筑產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈 形成核心競爭力──兼談福建發(fā)展的定位及其戰(zhàn)略選擇[J];福建改革;2000年08期

7 郁義鴻;;產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈類型與產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈效率基準[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2005年11期

8 芮明杰;劉明宇;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)狀產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈的知識整合研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2006年01期

9 于立宏;郁義鴻;;基于產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈效率的煤電縱向規(guī)制模式研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2006年06期

10 劉大可;產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈中企業(yè)與其供應商的權(quán)力關(guān)系分析[J];江蘇社會科學;2001年03期

，

本文編號：1727158