本文選題：資源詛咒　切入點(diǎn)：生產(chǎn)效率　出處：《山東師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：從世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展歷程來(lái)看，自然資源是一個(gè)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要物質(zhì)基礎(chǔ)，然而從上個(gè)世紀(jì)60年代以來(lái)，一些擁有豐富資源的國(guó)家（地區(qū)）的經(jīng)濟(jì)陷入發(fā)展的陷阱，而一些資源貧瘠的國(guó)家卻實(shí)現(xiàn)了經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展，這種現(xiàn)象被學(xué)者稱為“資源詛咒”。在我國(guó)，同樣存在這樣的現(xiàn)象，擁有豐富自然資源的中西部地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平明顯落后于資源貧瘠的東部省份�，F(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)理論認(rèn)為，生產(chǎn)效率的提高和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新是經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的源泉，而自然資源本身是不會(huì)阻礙經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，是否豐富的自然資源會(huì)阻礙生產(chǎn)效率的提高以及技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的發(fā)生。鑒于此，論文選取中國(guó)28個(gè)省份數(shù)據(jù)，構(gòu)建面板數(shù)據(jù)模型，對(duì)資源豐裕度與生產(chǎn)效率和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行分析。 論文首先對(duì)“資源詛咒”理論的發(fā)展歷程、傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制進(jìn)行了文獻(xiàn)回顧，然后根據(jù)內(nèi)生增長(zhǎng)理論構(gòu)建了一個(gè)三部門模型，從理論上研究資源豐裕程度與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和生產(chǎn)效率之間關(guān)系，結(jié)果表明自然越資源豐富的地區(qū)越不利于技術(shù)創(chuàng)新，從理論上揭示資源豐裕地區(qū)發(fā)展相對(duì)落后的原因。在進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析之前，對(duì)論文中重要指標(biāo)的選取進(jìn)行了說明，主要包括以下兩部分：第一，在構(gòu)建了資源豐裕度指標(biāo)時(shí)，區(qū)分了資源豐裕和資源依賴兩個(gè)重要概念，并根據(jù)我國(guó)目前的實(shí)際情況，得到自然資源指標(biāo)；第二，通過使用數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)法得到一個(gè)較為合理的生產(chǎn)效率和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的指標(biāo)。在實(shí)證分析部分，采用面板數(shù)據(jù)分析方法研究生產(chǎn)效率、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和資源豐裕度之間的關(guān)系，最后根據(jù)實(shí)證結(jié)果對(duì)資源豐裕地區(qū)的發(fā)展提出了相應(yīng)的政策建議。 論文研究的主要結(jié)論如下： （1）從實(shí)證結(jié)果來(lái)看，自然資源豐裕地區(qū)存在著抑制技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和阻礙生產(chǎn)效率提高的現(xiàn)象，而且估計(jì)的結(jié)果非常顯著。這與論文中理論模型所得到的結(jié)果相一致。這說明造成資源豐裕地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展落后的一個(gè)重要原因就是該地區(qū)沒有形成利于技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的環(huán)境，沒有形成利于生產(chǎn)率的提高的制度因素，因此，資源豐裕地區(qū)的政府在制定經(jīng)濟(jì)政策時(shí)，應(yīng)該充分考慮這一點(diǎn)。 （2）引入進(jìn)口規(guī)模、教育投入、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、市場(chǎng)化程度等控制變量后發(fā)現(xiàn)，進(jìn)口規(guī)模會(huì)顯著促進(jìn)生產(chǎn)效率和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新，，市場(chǎng)化程度越低越有利于生產(chǎn)效率的提高和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的產(chǎn)生，教育投入，產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)兩個(gè)變量對(duì)生產(chǎn)效率和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響并不明顯。逐次加入進(jìn)口規(guī)模等控制變量后，自然資源系數(shù)盡管仍然為負(fù)，但顯著性水平明顯降低，這說明這些控制變量能夠在一定程度上緩解自然資源對(duì)生產(chǎn)效率和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的“詛咒”，資源豐裕地區(qū)應(yīng)該進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大進(jìn)口規(guī)模，增加教育投入，積極調(diào)整產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)，深化國(guó)有企業(yè)體制改革，從而加快地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展速度，實(shí)現(xiàn)人民共同富裕。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the development of world economy, natural resources are the important material basis for a country's economic development. However, since the 1960s, some countries (regions) with rich resources have fallen into the trap of development. But some resource-poor countries have achieved rapid economic development, which has been referred to by scholars as the "resource curse." in China, the same phenomenon exists. The level of economic development in the central and western regions, which are rich in natural resources, lags behind those in the resource-poor eastern provinces. Modern economic growth theory holds that the improvement of production efficiency and technological innovation are the source of economic growth. The natural resources themselves will not hinder the economic development, whether the rich natural resources will hinder the efficiency of production and the occurrence of technological innovation. In view of this, the paper selects data from 28 provinces in China to build a panel data model. The relationship between resource abundance, production efficiency and technological innovation is analyzed. Firstly, the paper reviews the development course and transmission mechanism of the theory of "resource curse", and then constructs a three-sector model according to endogenous growth theory. The relationship between the abundance of resources and technological innovation and production efficiency is studied theoretically. The results show that the more abundant the natural resources are, the more unfavorable the technological innovation is. Before the empirical analysis, the selection of important indicators in the paper is explained, including the following two parts: first, in the construction of the resource abundance index, The two important concepts of resource abundance and resource dependence are distinguished, and natural resource indicators are obtained according to the current situation in our country. Secondly, A reasonable index of production efficiency and technological innovation is obtained by using data envelopment method. In the part of empirical analysis, panel data analysis method is used to study the relationship among production efficiency, technological innovation and resource abundance. Finally, according to the empirical results, the paper puts forward the corresponding policy recommendations for the development of resource-rich areas. The main conclusions of the thesis are as follows:. 1) from the empirical results, there is a phenomenon of restraining technological innovation and hindering the improvement of production efficiency in areas with abundant natural resources. And the estimated results are very significant. This is consistent with the results obtained by the theoretical models in this paper. This shows that an important reason for the backward economic development in resource-rich areas is that the region does not have an environment conducive to technological innovation. There are no institutional factors conducive to productivity improvement, so governments in resource-rich areas should take this into account when formulating economic policies. After introducing the control variables such as import scale, educational input, industrial structure and marketization degree, it is found that import scale can significantly promote production efficiency and technological innovation. The lower the degree of marketization is, the more conducive to the improvement of production efficiency and the production of technological innovation, the two variables of educational input and industrial structure have little effect on production efficiency and technological innovation. Although the coefficient of natural resources is still negative, the significant level of natural resources is significantly decreased. This shows that these control variables can alleviate to a certain extent the "curse" of natural resources on production efficiency and technological innovation, and that resource-rich areas should further expand the scale of imports, increase investment in education, and actively adjust the industrial structure. We will deepen the reform of the state-owned enterprise system so as to speed up the development of the regional economy and achieve common prosperity for the people.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F124.3;F124.5;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王生年;范俊逸;;新疆自然資源稟賦與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(西部論壇);2008年02期

2 胡援成;肖德勇;;經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展門檻與自然資源詛咒——基于我國(guó)省際層面的面板數(shù)據(jù)實(shí)證研究[J];管理世界;2007年04期

3 邵帥;齊中英;;資源輸出型地區(qū)的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)——對(duì)“資源詛咒”現(xiàn)象的解釋[J];管理科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

4 武芳梅;;“資源的詛咒”與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展——基于山西省的典型分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2007年10期

5 徐康寧,韓劍;中國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)的“資源詛咒”效應(yīng):地區(qū)差距的另一種解釋[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2005年06期

6 徐康寧;王劍;;自然資源豐裕程度與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平關(guān)系的研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年01期

7 王再文;;比較優(yōu)勢(shì)、制度變遷與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展——山西經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展歷史的解釋及啟示[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2006年12期

8 徐康寧;邵軍;;自然稟賦與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng):對(duì)“資源詛咒”命題的再檢驗(yàn)[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年11期

9 方穎;紀(jì)圢;趙揚(yáng);;中國(guó)是否存在“資源詛咒”[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年04期

10 趙奉軍;西部開發(fā)必須警惕“資源詛咒”[J];西部論叢;2005年10期

本文編號(hào)：1672878