本文選題：市場(chǎng)分割　切入點(diǎn)：經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)　出處：《中央民族大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)商品市場(chǎng)分割與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的關(guān)系在實(shí)證上仍是一個(gè)有待求證的問(wèn)題。本文首先綜合回顧了國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于市場(chǎng)分割程度的度量方法,然后相互比較選擇了最佳度量市場(chǎng)分割程度的相對(duì)價(jià)格法,計(jì)算出我國(guó)2001-2011年分省市、東中西部和全國(guó)整體市場(chǎng)三個(gè)層面的市場(chǎng)分割指數(shù),在這三個(gè)層面上分析比較我國(guó)市場(chǎng)分割程度的變化趨勢(shì)。其次,將我國(guó)2001-2011年間整體市場(chǎng)的市場(chǎng)分割指數(shù)納入到經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的計(jì)量實(shí)證模型中,考察市場(chǎng)分割程度對(duì)我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的實(shí)證影響。計(jì)量結(jié)果得出,市場(chǎng)分割與我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的關(guān)系是非線性的,在我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平較低時(shí),程度較輕的市場(chǎng)分割能夠促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)的增長(zhǎng),但隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的進(jìn)一步增長(zhǎng),市場(chǎng)分割阻礙經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的作用會(huì)越來(lái)越顯著。把表示對(duì)內(nèi)改革的非國(guó)有化變量和表示對(duì)外開放的外貿(mào)依存度變量引入實(shí)證模型來(lái)分析其對(duì)市場(chǎng)分割的影響后,發(fā)現(xiàn)這兩個(gè)變量都能夠通過(guò)降低市場(chǎng)分割程度,進(jìn)而對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)具有正向效應(yīng)。也就是我國(guó)的對(duì)內(nèi)改革和對(duì)外開放能夠降低市場(chǎng)分割程度,促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的作用。在此基礎(chǔ)之上,本文提出了降低我國(guó)市場(chǎng)分割程度,促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的政策含義是：隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)過(guò)了改革開放后的幾十年高速的發(fā)展,市場(chǎng)分割對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的正效應(yīng)階段已經(jīng)過(guò)去,而其負(fù)效應(yīng)越來(lái)越強(qiáng)烈。在改革開放的大背景下,為了減小我國(guó)的市場(chǎng)分割程度,將其對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的阻礙作用限制在最小的范圍內(nèi),首先必須轉(zhuǎn)變政府職能,盡量減小政府行政干預(yù)經(jīng)濟(jì)生產(chǎn)生活,做好市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的“守夜人”、市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的制定者和裁判員,確保市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)各微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)主體公平合法地參與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)；同時(shí)也應(yīng)該堅(jiān)定不移的深化對(duì)內(nèi)改革,健全中國(guó)特色的社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制；此外還應(yīng)該繼續(xù)多方面、全方位地?cái)U(kuò)大開放,其中關(guān)鍵就是要提升我國(guó)對(duì)外開放的質(zhì)量和效益,提升我國(guó)出口產(chǎn)品的高科技和高附加值含量,發(fā)展資源消耗少,環(huán)境污染小的產(chǎn)業(yè)。這也正是我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)持續(xù)健康穩(wěn)定增長(zhǎng)的希望之所在。
[Abstract]:The relationship between commodity market segmentation and economic growth in China is still an issue to be verified empirically. Then, we choose the best relative price method to measure the market segmentation degree, and calculate the market segmentation index of China from 2001 to 2011 at three levels: provinces, cities, east, west, west and the whole country. This paper analyzes and compares the trend of market segmentation in China at these three levels. Secondly, the market segmentation index of the whole market in China from 2001 to 2011 is incorporated into the econometric empirical model of economic growth. The empirical results show that the relationship between market segmentation and China's economic growth is nonlinear, and when the level of economic development in China is low, the relationship between market segmentation and economic growth is nonlinear. A lesser degree of market segmentation can boost economic growth, but as the economy grows further, The effect of market segmentation on economic growth will become more and more significant. After introducing the variables of denationalization of internal reform and foreign trade dependence on opening up to the outside world to analyze its impact on market segmentation, It is found that both of these variables can reduce the degree of market segmentation and thus have a positive effect on economic growth. That is, China's internal reform and opening to the outside world can reduce the degree of market segmentation. On the basis of this, this paper puts forward the policy meaning of reducing the degree of market segmentation and promoting economic growth: with the rapid development of China's economy after decades of reform and opening up, The positive effect of market segmentation on economic growth has passed, and its negative effect is becoming more and more intense. In order to reduce the market segmentation in China under the background of reform and opening up, To limit its hindrance to economic growth within the minimum scope, we must first change the functions of the government, minimize government administrative interference in economic production and life, and be the "night-watchmen" of the market economy, the makers and referees of the rules of the market economy. To ensure that all microeconomic subjects of the market economy participate in competition fairly and legally; at the same time, they should unswervingly deepen domestic reforms and improve the socialist market economic system with Chinese characteristics; in addition, they should continue to do so in many ways. The key to opening wider to the outside world is to improve the quality and efficiency of our country's opening to the outside world, to enhance the high technology and high value-added content of our export products, and to reduce the consumption of development resources. Environmental pollution is a small industry. This is the hope of sustained, healthy and stable economic growth in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F124.1;F723

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊元澤;趙會(huì)玉;;地方政府競(jìng)爭(zhēng)提高了經(jīng)濟(jì)效率么?——基于省級(jí)面板數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

2 劉培林;地方保護(hù)和市場(chǎng)分割的損失[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年04期

3 周叔蓮,魏后凱;21世紀(jì)我國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)開發(fā)戰(zhàn)略[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2000年02期

4 林泉;;民營(yíng)企業(yè)的成長(zhǎng)上限及克服[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2002年03期

5 白永秀,吳航;我國(guó)基本經(jīng)濟(jì)制度下非公有制經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展前景[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革;2003年02期

6 陳敏;桂琦寒;陸銘;陳釗;;中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)如何持續(xù)發(fā)揮規(guī)模效應(yīng)?——經(jīng)濟(jì)開放與國(guó)內(nèi)商品市場(chǎng)分割的實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)(季刊);2008年01期

7 吳意云;朱希偉;;接入效應(yīng)、市場(chǎng)分割與商品交易市場(chǎng)發(fā)展[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)(季刊);2012年01期

8 銀溫泉,才婉茹;我國(guó)地方市場(chǎng)分割的成因和治理[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2001年06期

9 白重恩,杜穎娟,陶志剛,仝月婷;地方保護(hù)主義及產(chǎn)業(yè)地區(qū)集中度的決定因素和變動(dòng)趨勢(shì)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年04期

10 周黎安;晉升博弈中政府官員的激勵(lì)與合作——兼論我國(guó)地方保護(hù)主義和重復(fù)建設(shè)問(wèn)題長(zhǎng)期存在的原因[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1672362