本文選題：證券侵權(quán) + 群體訴訟　； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)的逐步發(fā)展,證券侵權(quán)案件越來(lái)越多,證券群體性糾紛的影響和規(guī)模也越來(lái)越大,證券群體訴訟制度也越來(lái)越引起有關(guān)各方的重視。加之我國(guó)現(xiàn)在正努力建立全球性金融中心,而高效的證券法律法規(guī)是優(yōu)秀的資本市場(chǎng)所必須具備的,證券群體訴訟制度已被公認(rèn)為是保護(hù)投資者最有效的武器之一,所以創(chuàng)建高效的證券群體訴訟制度對(duì)于我國(guó)而言勢(shì)在必行。 我國(guó)學(xué)者對(duì)證券群體訴訟的研究,大多集中于對(duì)制度本身的對(duì)比和分析,通過(guò)對(duì)制度的深入研究,對(duì)各國(guó)的證券群體訴訟制度得出優(yōu)劣好壞的評(píng)判,并以此來(lái)建議應(yīng)該怎樣改進(jìn)我國(guó)的代表人訴訟制度,應(yīng)該引進(jìn)哪種國(guó)外的證券群體訴訟制度,但他們卻都忽略了對(duì)制度運(yùn)行所需要的關(guān)聯(lián)因素進(jìn)行分析。 基于此,筆者沒(méi)有把目光凝視在群體訴訟制度本身上,而是反其道而行之,致力于把各國(guó)的證券群體訴訟制度放到法律傳統(tǒng)、文化背景等這樣的大背景下來(lái)分析,并重點(diǎn)分析了與中國(guó)具有相似背景的日本、韓國(guó)和臺(tái)灣這三個(gè)國(guó)家或地區(qū)的證券群體訴訟制度。對(duì)于我國(guó)的證券群體訴訟研究,筆者側(cè)重于從整個(gè)社會(huì)體制下來(lái)分析,而不僅僅是分析立法條文和法學(xué)理論,尤其是重點(diǎn)分析了執(zhí)法和司法中存在的問(wèn)題。最后,筆者在通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外證券群體訴訟制度的比較和對(duì)我國(guó)法制現(xiàn)狀的分析,對(duì)我國(guó)的證券群體訴訟制度提出了自己的建議,即以我國(guó)國(guó)情為立足點(diǎn),以實(shí)踐人數(shù)不確定的加入制代表人訴訟為突破點(diǎn),在吸收集團(tuán)訴訟優(yōu)點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上逐步完善我國(guó)的代表人訴訟制度。
[Abstract]:With the gradual development of the securities market in China, more and more cases of securities infringement, the impact and scale of securities group disputes are becoming larger and larger, and the system of securities group litigation has attracted more and more attention from all parties concerned. In addition, China is now striving to establish a global financial center, and efficient securities laws and regulations are necessary for an excellent capital market. The securities group litigation system has been recognized as one of the most effective weapons for protecting investors. Therefore, it is imperative to establish an efficient securities group litigation system for our country. Most of our scholars' research on securities group litigation focuses on the comparison and analysis of the system itself. Through the in-depth study of the system, we can judge the merits and demerits of the securities group litigation system of various countries. It also suggests how to improve the representative litigation system of our country and which kind of foreign securities group litigation system should be introduced, but they all ignore the analysis of the relevant factors needed for the operation of the system. Based on this, the author does not look at the group action system itself, but does the opposite, and devotes to put the securities group litigation system of various countries into the legal tradition, the cultural background and so on under the big background to analyze. It also analyzes the securities group litigation system of Japan, Korea and Taiwan, which have similar background with China. For the study of securities group action in China, the author focuses on the analysis from the whole social system, not just the legislative provisions and the theory of law, especially the analysis of the problems in law enforcement and administration of justice. Finally, through the comparison of domestic and foreign securities group litigation system and the analysis of China's legal status quo, the author puts forward his own suggestions on the securities group litigation system of our country, that is, taking the national conditions of our country as the foothold. The representative litigation system of our country is gradually perfected on the basis of absorbing the advantages of class action by taking the participation system of representative litigation with uncertain number of people in practice as the breakthrough point.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.287;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 鐘志勇;;試論我國(guó)證券民事訴訟形式之完善路徑[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

2 湯維建;;論團(tuán)體訴訟的制度理性[J];法學(xué)家;2008年05期

3 湯欣;;私人訴訟與證券執(zhí)法[J];清華法學(xué);2007年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1916142