發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-12 10:40

【摘要】：相對(duì)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家來(lái)說(shuō),中國(guó)航空運(yùn)輸服務(wù)建設(shè)比較薄弱,這與日益興盛的航空運(yùn)輸市場(chǎng)需求形成鮮明的矛盾。在航空運(yùn)輸市場(chǎng)越來(lái)越開(kāi)放的環(huán)境下,航空運(yùn)輸企業(yè)要面臨來(lái)自國(guó)內(nèi)外多方面的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)壓力。在內(nèi)外因素的共同影響下,航空公司更應(yīng)該致力于理解顧客的需求,提升顧客的滿(mǎn)意度,關(guān)注顧客對(duì)服務(wù)體驗(yàn)后的評(píng)價(jià)。針對(duì)這一問(wèn)題,本文探索當(dāng)服務(wù)失敗發(fā)生后,針對(duì)航空公司提供的服務(wù)補(bǔ)救活動(dòng),旅客的滿(mǎn)意度變化及對(duì)行為意向影響,然后依據(jù)研究結(jié)果,建立航空公司服務(wù)補(bǔ)救機(jī)制及提出相關(guān)的政策建議。本文共劃分為五個(gè)部分,第一個(gè)部分介紹了航空公司服務(wù)失敗補(bǔ)救的背景及其現(xiàn)狀;第二部分回顧以往學(xué)者的研究成果,為本文的模型建立提供理論依據(jù);第三部分則是在文獻(xiàn)回顧的理論模型基礎(chǔ)上,提出相關(guān)的研究假設(shè)。接著通過(guò)發(fā)放調(diào)查問(wèn)卷、實(shí)地調(diào)研收集一手?jǐn)?shù)據(jù);第四部分運(yùn)用數(shù)據(jù)分析方法,通過(guò)結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型對(duì)研究假設(shè)進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證,推導(dǎo)出實(shí)證研究結(jié)果;第五部分將總結(jié)研究的結(jié)論并對(duì)航空服務(wù)業(yè)提出管理建議,設(shè)計(jì)優(yōu)化的服務(wù)補(bǔ)救措施。經(jīng)過(guò)理論梳理和實(shí)證分析,本文的研究結(jié)果包括以下幾方面:首先,航空公司服務(wù)補(bǔ)救的結(jié)果公平、過(guò)程公平、交互公平在補(bǔ)救效果上相互補(bǔ)充,補(bǔ)救物質(zhì)補(bǔ)償、及時(shí)性與補(bǔ)救交互方式同等重要,不可相互替代。研究結(jié)果表明,旅客對(duì)航空公司補(bǔ)救活動(dòng)的結(jié)果公平性更敏感,因此在服務(wù)失敗發(fā)生后,航空公司的服務(wù)補(bǔ)救應(yīng)該有原則地進(jìn)行補(bǔ)救,而不應(yīng)該視旅客的“鬧事能力”而定;其次,航班延誤和行李托運(yùn)等其他服務(wù)更容易使旅客產(chǎn)生憤怒情緒,并且補(bǔ)救效果明顯要低于其他的服務(wù)失敗情境。這可能是由于航空公司也無(wú)法遏制航班延誤和行李丟失現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生,從而導(dǎo)致航空公司對(duì)事件的解釋無(wú)法令旅客滿(mǎn)意;再次,可以考慮采用道歉+經(jīng)濟(jì)補(bǔ)償?shù)姆绞?提高顧客的感知價(jià)值,從而產(chǎn)生積極的行為意向。最后,本文在實(shí)證結(jié)論的基礎(chǔ)上,建立了切實(shí)可行航空公司服務(wù)補(bǔ)救機(jī)制,為航空公司服務(wù)補(bǔ)救實(shí)踐提供理論指導(dǎo)。
[Abstract]:Compared with the developed countries, the construction of air transport services in China is relatively weak, which is in sharp contradiction with the increasing demand of the air transport market. In the environment of more and more open air transport market, air transport enterprises have to face competition pressure from many aspects at home and abroad. Under the influence of internal and external factors, airlines should focus on understanding customer needs, enhancing customer satisfaction, and paying attention to customer evaluation after service experience. In order to solve this problem, this paper explores the change of passenger satisfaction and its influence on behavior intention in view of the service recovery activities provided by airlines when the service failure occurs, and then according to the results of the study, Establish airline service remedy mechanism and make relevant policy recommendations. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part introduces the background and current situation of airline service failure remedy, the second part reviews the previous research results and provides the theoretical basis for the establishment of this model. In the third part, based on the theoretical model of literature review, the relevant research hypotheses are put forward. The fourth part uses the method of data analysis to verify the research hypothesis through the structural equation model and deduces the empirical research results. In the fifth part, the conclusion of the research is summarized, and the management suggestions for aviation service industry are put forward, and the optimized service remedial measures are designed. Through theoretical analysis and empirical analysis, the research results of this paper include the following aspects: first, airline service recovery results are fair, process fairness, mutual equity in the remedial effect of complementary, remedial material compensation, Timeliness and remedial interaction are equally important and cannot be replaced by each other. The results show that passengers are more sensitive to the fairness of airline remedial activities. Therefore, after the failure of service, the airline service remedy should be remedied in principle rather than depending on the passengers'"ability to make trouble". Second, other services such as flight delays and baggage checks are more likely to make passengers angry, and remedies are significantly less effective than other service failures. This may be due to the fact that airlines are also unable to contain flight delays and the loss of luggage, resulting in the airlines' explanation of the incident not being satisfactory to the passengers. Thirdly, we can consider using an apology as a form of economic compensation. Improve the perceived value of the customer, thus generating positive behavior intention. Finally, on the basis of empirical conclusions, this paper establishes a feasible airline service remedy mechanism, which provides theoretical guidance for airline service recovery practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)民航大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F274;F562.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝泗薪;侯蒙;;基于顧客感知的民航客運(yùn)附加服務(wù)購(gòu)買(mǎi)意向?qū)嵶C研究[J];價(jià)格月刊;2016年08期

2 楊秀云;趙科翔;化文君;;我國(guó)航班延誤服務(wù)補(bǔ)救效率的影響因素及路徑研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)緯;2015年02期

3 李靜;趙必華;;中介效應(yīng)檢驗(yàn)方法的探新[J];社會(huì)心理科學(xué);2014年07期

4 溫忠麟;葉寶娟;;中介效應(yīng)分析:方法和模型發(fā)展[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2014年05期

5 陳國(guó)平;邊二寶;李呈嬌;;服務(wù)補(bǔ)救中自我調(diào)節(jié)導(dǎo)向?qū)︻櫩透兄降恼{(diào)節(jié)作用——基于旅行社的實(shí)證研究[J];旅游學(xué)刊;2012年08期

6 魚(yú)文英;李京勛;;消費(fèi)情感與服務(wù)質(zhì)量、顧客滿(mǎn)意和重復(fù)購(gòu)買(mǎi)意愿關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究——以航空服務(wù)行業(yè)為例[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2012年07期

7 何倩茵;;淺談航空公司的服務(wù)失誤與補(bǔ)救[J];空運(yùn)商務(wù);2012年09期

8 常亞平;姚慧平;韓丹;閻俊;張金隆;;電子商務(wù)環(huán)境下服務(wù)補(bǔ)救對(duì)顧客忠誠(chéng)的影響機(jī)制研究[J];管理評(píng)論;2009年11期

9 張圣亮;周海濱;;我國(guó)民航客運(yùn)服務(wù)補(bǔ)救博弈分析[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2008年01期

10 鄭秋瑩;范秀成;;網(wǎng)上零售業(yè)服務(wù)補(bǔ)救策略研究——基于公平理論和期望理論的探討[J];管理評(píng)論;2007年10期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 代旭靜;B2C環(huán)境下網(wǎng)絡(luò)零售商服務(wù)補(bǔ)救系統(tǒng)研究[D];天津大學(xué);2014年

2 邱紅平;國(guó)內(nèi)非正常航班及服務(wù)問(wèn)題成因與對(duì)策研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

3 張俊麗;航班延誤的服務(wù)補(bǔ)救研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

4 周海濱;我國(guó)民航業(yè)航班延誤服務(wù)補(bǔ)救策略研究[D];中國(guó)科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué);2009年

5 舒莉;航空公司航班延誤服務(wù)補(bǔ)救策略研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年

6 王虹穎;航空公司機(jī)票超售服務(wù)補(bǔ)救策略研究[D];四川大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2265807