本文關鍵詞： “類國企化” 政府干預 產品市場競爭 創(chuàng)新效率　出處：《石河子大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：本文通過對我國當前現(xiàn)狀的分析與現(xiàn)階段文獻的閱讀與梳理,將民企在要素資源獲取方式、產品市場競爭參與方式方面采取與國企相類似的經營發(fā)展路徑定義為民企的“類國企化”取向,并通過探討“類國企化”的創(chuàng)新效率損失,理論論證民企的“類國企化”對微觀企業(yè)以及產品市場競爭的關系�；谏鲜隹紤],本文主要研究了如下3個問題:(1)民企中的“類國企化”取向是否普遍存在,如果存在,民營企業(yè)“類國企化”是通過何種路徑形成。(2)民企的這種“理性選擇”在我國市場化改革不斷深化并日益凸顯其法制經濟之本質特征的背景下,將會對企業(yè)的創(chuàng)新效率產生何種影響?本文試圖理清“類國企化”取向作用于企業(yè)創(chuàng)新活動的背后機制,從而為政府在未來制定企業(yè)政策時提供經驗證據(jù)。(3)政府干預作為影響民企“類國企化”取向的制度淵源,在政府干預嚴重時,民企的“類國企化”與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新效率的結果是否更顯著。文章選取了2007-2015年滬深A股上市公司樣本,剔除金融業(yè)、ST及PT的上市公司數(shù)據(jù)、同時發(fā)行B股或H股的公司、數(shù)據(jù)缺失企業(yè),最終得到9216個樣本觀測值。實證研究了諸多民企的“類國企化”取向會造成民企的創(chuàng)新效率損失,以及其通過產品市場競爭有調節(jié)的中介效應從而造成民企更大程度的創(chuàng)新效率損失。進一步研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在政府干預嚴重的地區(qū),民企的“類國企化”取向通過產品市場競爭造成企業(yè)創(chuàng)新效率損失的結果更加顯著。上述發(fā)現(xiàn)為中國國企改革及其治理提供經驗啟示的同時,也為中國諸多民企的“類國企化”經營取向及其創(chuàng)新效率損失提供了風險警示意義。
[Abstract]:Through the analysis of the present situation of our country and the reading and combing of the literature at the present stage, this paper attempts to obtain the mode of obtaining the factor resources of the private enterprises. In the aspect of product market competition and participation, we adopt the management and development path similar to that of state-owned enterprises and define them as "quasi-state-owned enterprises", and discuss the loss of innovation efficiency of "quasi-state-owned enterprises". Based on the above considerations, this paper mainly studies the following three questions: (1) whether or not the orientation of "quasi-state-owned enterprises" exists generally in private enterprises, and if so, In the background of the deepening of China's market-oriented reform and the increasing prominence of the essential characteristics of its legal economy, this "rational choice" of private enterprises is formed through what path. What impact will it have on the efficiency of innovation? This paper attempts to clarify the mechanism behind the action of the "quasi-state-owned enterprise" orientation on enterprise innovation activities, thus providing empirical evidence for the government in formulating enterprise policy in the future) government intervention as the institutional origin of influencing the "quasi-state-owned enterprise" orientation of private enterprises. When government intervention is serious, the results of "SOE" and innovation efficiency of private enterprises are more significant. This paper selects a sample of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2007 to 2015, and excludes the data of St and PT listed companies in the financial sector. Companies that issue B-shares or H-shares at the same time, the companies with missing data, finally get 9216 sample observations. The empirical study shows that the "quasi-state-owned" orientation of many private enterprises will result in the loss of innovation efficiency of private enterprises. And its mediating effect through product market competition, resulting in a greater loss of innovation efficiency of private enterprises. Further studies have found that in areas where government intervention is serious, The result of the loss of innovation efficiency caused by the competition in the product market is more remarkable. The above findings provide experience and enlightenment for the reform and governance of state-owned enterprises in China. It also provides the risk warning significance for the management orientation and the loss of innovation efficiency of many private enterprises in China.
【學位授予單位】：石河子大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F276.5;F273.1;F274

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 曾萍;呂迪偉;劉洋;;技術創(chuàng)新、政治關聯(lián)與政府創(chuàng)新支持:機制與路徑[J];科研管理;2016年07期

2 鐘昀珈;張晨宇;陳德球;;國企民營化與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新效率:促進還是抑制?[J];財經研究;2016年07期

3 徐業(yè)坤;李維安;;政績推動、政治關聯(lián)與民營企業(yè)投資擴張[J];經濟理論與經濟管理;2016年05期

4 杜勇;陳建英;;政治關聯(lián)、慈善捐贈與政府補助——來自中國虧損上市公司的經驗證據(jù)[J];財經研究;2016年05期

5 孫鳳娥;田治威;蘇寧;;政治關聯(lián)、融資約束與資本結構周期性變動[J];現(xiàn)代財經(天津財經大學學報);2016年04期

6 鄧曉飛;辛宇;滕飛;;官員獨立董事強制辭職與政治關聯(lián)喪失[J];中國工業(yè)經濟;2016年02期

7 姚晶晶;鞠冬;張建君;;企業(yè)是否會近墨者黑:企業(yè)規(guī)模、政府重要性與企業(yè)政治行為[J];管理世界;2015年07期

8 白俊;姚盛;;銀行業(yè)結構、企業(yè)高管權力與企業(yè)現(xiàn)金持有[J];金融論壇;2015年04期

9 邱兆林;;政府干預、企業(yè)自主研發(fā)與高技術產業(yè)創(chuàng)新——基于中國省級面板數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析[J];經濟問題探索;2015年04期

10 楊汝岱;;中國制造業(yè)企業(yè)全要素生產率研究[J];經濟研究;2015年02期

，

本文編號：1551812