國(guó)有與民營(yíng)影視企業(yè)管理模式探究
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy, China's position in the world is getting higher and higher, and at the beginning of the 21st century, after China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). Under the background of the global economic development, the film and television development industry of our country has also obtained the unprecedented development. A large number of excellent film and television works have emerged in the development of film and television industry in China. In order to promote the development of various industries, especially the emerging film and television industry, the state has given the private film and television industry a great development space, and created a lot of opportunities for the development of the film and television industry. In the process of the development of film and television industry in China, the development of film and television industry represented by state-owned media and the development of private film and television industry represented by private film and television media have formed two kinds of situations. State-owned large-scale film and television media are mainly based on traditional radio, television and large-scale theaters, while private film and television enterprises as a rising star in the development of the film and television industry is a supplement to the development of state-owned film and television units. Both of them play an important role in the operation and development of the film and television industry in the cultural industry of our country. It is of certain significance to analyze and compare them in an all-round way as well as to probe into the management mode. This study on the state-owned and private two types of film and television enterprise management mode. This paper probes into the management mode of film and television enterprise from different angles, and enriches the research results of film and television enterprise management and business management mode. Through historical literature inquiry, actual investigation, case study and qualitative and quantitative combination, combined with second-hand materials such as the Internet, public publications and books, and first-hand interviews with practitioners in a number of relevant industries, On the basis of quasi-public goods and SWOT analysis theory, this paper discusses, summarizes and compares the management modes of state-owned film and television and private film and television. This paper mainly discusses three aspects of the management mode of film and television enterprises. First of all, it is the precondition of the management model, that is, the response to the policy. Secondly, it is the core content of the management mode, that is, the financial governance system such as the financing model. Finally, it is a part of the management model, that is, the enterprise's talent measures and product market policies contained in the management model. Based on the examples of Zhejiang Hengdian Group and Shanghai Oriental Pearl Co., Ltd., this paper analyzes and discusses the forms and contents of these management modes. Through these discussions, this paper will take the state-owned and private film and television enterprises as the research object, explore the management optimization mode of the two, start with the theoretical basis of the research, comb the development of the state-owned and private film and television enterprises, and carry on the analysis of the present situation. The representative cases of state-owned and private-owned film and television enterprises are selected to analyze the cases, summarize the development ways of the management of state-owned and private-owned film and television enterprises, and put forward the prospects and suggestions for the future development. In order to provide a theoretical reference for the management practice of film and television enterprises, promote the optimization of management mode.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中國(guó)藝術(shù)研究院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:J943
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 金琳;;股權(quán)激勵(lì)是引進(jìn)優(yōu)秀人才的重要籌碼——訪東方明珠副總裁程志超[J];上海國(guó)資;2016年12期
2 張飛飛;孫海濤;;基于平衡計(jì)分卡的企業(yè)并購(gòu)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究——以東方明珠新媒體為例[J];商業(yè)會(huì)計(jì);2016年22期
3 榮琪明;;高職影視動(dòng)畫(huà)專業(yè)工作室模式的探索與實(shí)踐——以廣東科貿(mào)職業(yè)學(xué)院為例[J];開(kāi)封教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年08期
4 王玉玨;;VR影視現(xiàn)狀及樂(lè)視VR的內(nèi)容布局[J];影視制作;2016年07期
5 羅青林;;媒體融合背景下傳媒企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)管理模式分析——基于傳媒史的視角[J];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期
6 彭曦;;我國(guó)民營(yíng)影視行業(yè)人力資源管理淺析[J];人才資源開(kāi)發(fā);2016年10期
7 周斌;;中小規(guī)模民營(yíng)影視公司發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀、策略與前景[J];浙江傳媒學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期
8 詹成大;;我國(guó)民營(yíng)中小影視文化企業(yè)融資困境及其對(duì)策[J];中國(guó)廣播電視學(xué)刊;2016年04期
9 王建軍;;整合轉(zhuǎn)型創(chuàng)新 做強(qiáng)做大做優(yōu)——上海文廣體制機(jī)制深化改革實(shí)踐[J];中國(guó)廣播電視學(xué)刊;2016年02期
10 謝雪凱;;電影產(chǎn)業(yè)融資之困境與出路——以未來(lái)著作權(quán)質(zhì)押為視角[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2015年11期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 林高;我國(guó)國(guó)有企業(yè)高管政治關(guān)聯(lián)研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年
2 王仁榮;跨國(guó)公司跨境并購(gòu)法律問(wèn)題研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年
3 金蕾;中國(guó)上市銀行高管薪酬制度研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年
4 高林玉;公用事業(yè)投資問(wèn)題研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年
5 潘祺志;我國(guó)工業(yè)能耗強(qiáng)度變動(dòng)與節(jié)能路徑選擇[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年
6 席鑫;并購(gòu)對(duì)公司價(jià)值的溢出效應(yīng)[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年
7 張江峰;企業(yè)組織慣性的形成及其對(duì)績(jī)效的作用機(jī)制研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年
8 張慶文;云南省金屬產(chǎn)業(yè)循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2010年
9 王希;國(guó)有企業(yè)改革與最優(yōu)產(chǎn)權(quán)安排[D];華中科技大學(xué);2009年
10 李文敏;我國(guó)公立醫(yī)院法人治理及其路徑研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 王振偉;國(guó)有企業(yè)資本管理制度對(duì)財(cái)政支出功能的補(bǔ)充研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年
2 邱娜;領(lǐng)導(dǎo)風(fēng)格、心理契約與離職傾向的關(guān)系研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2015年
3 陳q邛,
本文編號(hào):2463542
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/whjj/2463542.html