【摘要】：知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代，文化產(chǎn)業(yè)已成為了一個(gè)國(guó)家綜合國(guó)力競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的象征。十八大報(bào)告曾指出，要“推動(dòng)文化事業(yè)全面繁榮，文化產(chǎn)業(yè)快速發(fā)展”，然而，我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展起步晚，底子薄，，且與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展情況一樣存在著明顯的區(qū)域差異，但文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展卻并不完全與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展相一致，如西部地區(qū)的西藏，甘肅等地，在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展較落后的情況下，仍然表現(xiàn)出文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的繁榮，正是基于這種現(xiàn)象，本文試圖探索我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)存在的區(qū)域差異及其原因。 本文運(yùn)用2000年～2010年文化產(chǎn)業(yè)相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)，通過(guò)計(jì)算泰爾指數(shù)分析了我國(guó)東、中、西部的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展差異，分析結(jié)果顯示我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展情況與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展情況一樣存在著明顯的差異，但這種差異在逐步縮小，東、中、西部三大地區(qū)中，東部地區(qū)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展規(guī)模和收入情況最好，且遠(yuǎn)超過(guò)中、西部地區(qū)，但同時(shí)東部地區(qū)內(nèi)部省份文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的差異最大。在利用因子分析對(duì)我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的區(qū)域競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展落后的地區(qū)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展也相對(duì)落后，但這并不是絕對(duì)。 分析了我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展中存在的區(qū)域差異之后，本文利用回歸分析對(duì)我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)域差異的形成原因進(jìn)行了分析。分析顯示，GDP、財(cái)政撥款、文化市場(chǎng)經(jīng)營(yíng)機(jī)構(gòu)總資產(chǎn)都與文化產(chǎn)業(yè)收入存在著正相關(guān)關(guān)系，城鎮(zhèn)居民人均可支配收入與人均文化消費(fèi)支出存在著明顯的正相關(guān)關(guān)系。 通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)存在的區(qū)域差異及差異成因分析，本文認(rèn)為：文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展雖然受經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的影響較大，但并不是經(jīng)濟(jì)落后的地區(qū)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展就一定落后，在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展落后地區(qū)，也可以利用文化資源優(yōu)勢(shì)發(fā)展文化產(chǎn)業(yè)，以帶動(dòng)該區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。同時(shí)，本文提出：可通過(guò)增加人民收入、提升人民文化消費(fèi)意識(shí)、加大政府投資力度、完善文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展市場(chǎng)機(jī)制，鼓勵(lì)文化市場(chǎng)經(jīng)營(yíng)機(jī)構(gòu)投資等方法來(lái)推動(dòng)區(qū)域文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In the era of knowledge economy, cultural industry has become the symbol of a country's comprehensive national competitiveness. The report of the 18th National Congress of the National people's Congress pointed out that it is necessary to "promote the overall prosperity of cultural undertakings and the rapid development of cultural industries." however, the development of cultural industries in China started late, with a weak foundation, and there are obvious regional differences as well as economic development. However, the development of the cultural industry is not entirely consistent with the economic development. For example, Tibet and Gansu in the western region are still showing the prosperity of the cultural industry despite the relatively backward economic development. This is precisely because of this phenomenon. This paper attempts to explore the regional differences in cultural industries in China and their causes. Based on the relevant data of cultural industry from 2000 to 2010, this paper analyzes the differences in the development of cultural industry in east, middle and west of China by calculating the Thiel index. The results show that there are obvious differences between the development of cultural industry and the economic development in China, but the difference is gradually narrowing. The scale and income of the cultural industry in the east, middle and west are the best. And far beyond the central and western regions, but at the same time, the eastern provinces in the development of cultural industry is the biggest difference. When the factor analysis is used to evaluate the regional competitiveness of China's cultural industry, it is found that the region with backward economic development is also relatively backward in the development of cultural industry, but this is not absolute. After analyzing the regional differences in the development of China's cultural industry, this paper analyzes the causes of the regional differences in China's cultural industries by means of regression analysis. The analysis shows that there is a positive correlation between the GDP, financial allocation and the total assets of the cultural market management institutions and the income of the cultural industry, while the per capita disposable income of urban residents and the per capita cultural consumption expenditure have obvious positive correlation. Based on the analysis of the regional differences and the causes of the differences in the cultural industries in China, this paper holds that the development of the cultural industries is greatly influenced by the economic development, but the development of the cultural industries in the economically backward regions is not necessarily backward. In the backward areas of economic development, cultural resources can also be used to develop cultural industries in order to promote the economic development of the region. At the same time, this paper puts forward that by increasing people's income, raising people's awareness of cultural consumption, increasing government investment, and perfecting the market mechanism of cultural industry development, To promote the development of regional cultural industry by encouraging the investment of cultural market management institutions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白仲堯;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)理論的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年02期

2 韓美群;;當(dāng)代西方文化產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)域發(fā)展模式評(píng)析[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年06期

3 王吉恒;裴麗;;中國(guó)保險(xiǎn)業(yè)區(qū)域發(fā)展差異的泰爾指數(shù)測(cè)度與實(shí)證分析[J];哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

4 張曼茵;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的類型及發(fā)展特征[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;1999年13期

5 張建勛;發(fā)展文化產(chǎn)業(yè)初探[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題探索;1994年12期

6 馬萱;鄭世林;;中國(guó)區(qū)域文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率研究綜述與展望[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2010年03期

7 梁君;陳顯軍;;我國(guó)區(qū)域間文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展差異研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2012年04期

8 顏薈;;我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)域差異化發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀與戰(zhàn)略調(diào)整[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)月刊;2008年12期

9 趙寶晨;;對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的哲學(xué)思考[J];理論學(xué)刊;2006年05期

10 駱敏;;基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播模式的動(dòng)漫產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展探討[J];新聞界;2007年02期

本文編號(hào)：2360383