南沙區(qū)文化市場綜合行政執(zhí)法體系的構(gòu)建研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-01 18:52
【摘要】：我國改革開放后，文化作為商品進入了市場，從而逐漸形成了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)和文化市場。具有精神屬性的產(chǎn)品進入了市場，賦予了文化市場精神性、知識性、時效性等特性，它的特性注定了政府對其管理，不能按照物質(zhì)市場模式進行。隨著改革開放的不斷深入，文化大發(fā)展、大繁榮戰(zhàn)略的提出，加速了文化市場的發(fā)展，這就要求我國文化管理部門要不斷轉(zhuǎn)變管理職能，不斷探索實踐，大力推進行政執(zhí)法制度創(chuàng)新,才能維護文化市場經(jīng)營秩序的穩(wěn)定。推行文化市場綜合執(zhí)法改革是國家推進宏觀行政管理體制改革的重要組成部分，它對于確保意識形態(tài)領(lǐng)域安全、轉(zhuǎn)變政府職能、加強市場監(jiān)管、繁榮文化市場等具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。為了給適應(yīng)日漸繁榮的文化市場，2004年，我國開始文化市場綜合行政執(zhí)法的改革，各地相繼成立了綜合行政執(zhí)法機構(gòu)。 2005年廣州市南沙區(qū)按照文化市場執(zhí)法機構(gòu)改革的要求，完成了改革任務(wù)，成立了文化市場管理和執(zhí)法機構(gòu)。執(zhí)法隊在推進綜合行政執(zhí)法工作過程中，緊密結(jié)合本地經(jīng)濟社會發(fā)展實際，圍繞中心，按照建設(shè)法治社會和首善之區(qū)的要求，通過整合執(zhí)法隊伍、規(guī)范機構(gòu)設(shè)置和管理體制，提高了執(zhí)法效率，降低了執(zhí)法成本，提升了綜合行政執(zhí)法水平，取得了較好的成效。但隨著城市化速度不斷加快,文化市場改革的不斷深入，文化綜合行政執(zhí)法工作遇到一些突出問題，主要是行政審批、執(zhí)法沒有完全剝離；文化市場執(zhí)法的機構(gòu)和責(zé)任不統(tǒng)一；多頭管理、管理缺位；執(zhí)法力量嚴重不足、執(zhí)法成本高等。這些問題的存在不利于南沙文化市場進一步的發(fā)展。 針對文化市場執(zhí)法存在的問題，本文以廣州市南沙區(qū)文化市場為研究對象，，結(jié)合權(quán)力的分立與制衡理論，在廣泛調(diào)研的基礎(chǔ)上，借鑒國內(nèi)外的先進管理經(jīng)驗和行政執(zhí)法模式，對南沙區(qū)文化市場綜合行政執(zhí)法體系提出了相關(guān)構(gòu)想。建議先從完善體系中一方面入手，設(shè)立南沙區(qū)文化市場綜合行政執(zhí)法局，獨立行使區(qū)體育局、旅游局、文廣新局、城市管理執(zhí)法分局監(jiān)管和行政處罰權(quán)以及公安分局、工商分局、衛(wèi)生局部分職權(quán)；同時對執(zhí)法局的職權(quán)范圍、組織架構(gòu)、運行機制，以及組織人員保障、經(jīng)費保障等進行規(guī)劃,并設(shè)計有關(guān)監(jiān)控機制。本論文的研究希望能對我國文化市場的有效管理以及綜合行政執(zhí)法體系的完善做出有益的探索。
[Abstract]:After China's reform and opening up, culture as a commodity entered the market, thus gradually forming cultural industry and cultural market. The products with spiritual attributes enter the market, and endow the cultural market with the characteristics of spirit, knowledge, timeliness, etc. Its characteristics doomed the government to manage it and cannot be carried out according to the material market model. With the deepening of reform and opening up, the great development of culture and the development of the strategy of great prosperity, the development of cultural market has been accelerated, which requires the cultural management departments of our country to constantly change their management functions and explore the practice. Only by vigorously promoting the innovation of administrative law enforcement system can we maintain the stability of the management order of the cultural market. The promotion of comprehensive law enforcement reform in the cultural market is an important part of the country's efforts to promote the reform of the macro-administrative system, which can ensure the safety of the ideological field, transform the functions of the government, and strengthen the supervision of the market. The prosperity culture market and so on has the important realistic significance. In order to adapt to the increasingly prosperous cultural market, in 2004, China began the reform of comprehensive administrative law enforcement in the cultural market. In 2005, Nansha District of Guangzhou completed the reform task and set up the cultural market management and law enforcement agencies in accordance with the requirements of the reform of the law enforcement agencies in the cultural market. In the process of promoting comprehensive administrative law enforcement, the law enforcement team closely combines the reality of local economic and social development, revolves around the center, and in accordance with the requirements of building a society ruled by law and the first and best areas, standardizes the setting up and management system of institutions through the integration of law enforcement teams. Improve the efficiency of law enforcement, reduce the cost of law enforcement, improve the level of comprehensive administrative law enforcement, and achieve better results. However, with the acceleration of urbanization and the deepening of cultural market reform, the comprehensive administrative law enforcement of culture has encountered some outstanding problems, mainly administrative examination and approval, law enforcement has not been completely stripped, the cultural market law enforcement agencies and responsibilities are not unified; Long management, management absence; serious shortage of law enforcement, high law enforcement costs. The existence of these problems is not conducive to the further development of Nansha cultural market. Aiming at the problems existing in the law enforcement of cultural market, this paper takes the cultural market of Nansha District of Guangzhou as the research object, combines the theory of separation and balance of power, draws lessons from the advanced management experience and administrative law enforcement mode at home and abroad on the basis of extensive investigation. Put forward the related conception to the comprehensive administrative law enforcement system of the cultural market in Nansha district. It is suggested that, on the one hand, we should set up a comprehensive administrative law enforcement bureau for the cultural market in Nansha district, and independently exercise the district sports bureau, the tourism bureau, the Wen Guangxin bureau, the urban management law enforcement bureau, the supervision and administrative punishment authority, and the public security bureau. At the same time, it plans the terms of reference, the organizational structure, the operational mechanism, the organizational personnel guarantee and the fund guarantee of the law enforcement bureau, and designs the relevant monitoring mechanism. The purpose of this paper is to explore the effective management of Chinese cultural market and the perfection of comprehensive administrative law enforcement system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D922.1;G124
本文編號：2158511
[Abstract]:After China's reform and opening up, culture as a commodity entered the market, thus gradually forming cultural industry and cultural market. The products with spiritual attributes enter the market, and endow the cultural market with the characteristics of spirit, knowledge, timeliness, etc. Its characteristics doomed the government to manage it and cannot be carried out according to the material market model. With the deepening of reform and opening up, the great development of culture and the development of the strategy of great prosperity, the development of cultural market has been accelerated, which requires the cultural management departments of our country to constantly change their management functions and explore the practice. Only by vigorously promoting the innovation of administrative law enforcement system can we maintain the stability of the management order of the cultural market. The promotion of comprehensive law enforcement reform in the cultural market is an important part of the country's efforts to promote the reform of the macro-administrative system, which can ensure the safety of the ideological field, transform the functions of the government, and strengthen the supervision of the market. The prosperity culture market and so on has the important realistic significance. In order to adapt to the increasingly prosperous cultural market, in 2004, China began the reform of comprehensive administrative law enforcement in the cultural market. In 2005, Nansha District of Guangzhou completed the reform task and set up the cultural market management and law enforcement agencies in accordance with the requirements of the reform of the law enforcement agencies in the cultural market. In the process of promoting comprehensive administrative law enforcement, the law enforcement team closely combines the reality of local economic and social development, revolves around the center, and in accordance with the requirements of building a society ruled by law and the first and best areas, standardizes the setting up and management system of institutions through the integration of law enforcement teams. Improve the efficiency of law enforcement, reduce the cost of law enforcement, improve the level of comprehensive administrative law enforcement, and achieve better results. However, with the acceleration of urbanization and the deepening of cultural market reform, the comprehensive administrative law enforcement of culture has encountered some outstanding problems, mainly administrative examination and approval, law enforcement has not been completely stripped, the cultural market law enforcement agencies and responsibilities are not unified; Long management, management absence; serious shortage of law enforcement, high law enforcement costs. The existence of these problems is not conducive to the further development of Nansha cultural market. Aiming at the problems existing in the law enforcement of cultural market, this paper takes the cultural market of Nansha District of Guangzhou as the research object, combines the theory of separation and balance of power, draws lessons from the advanced management experience and administrative law enforcement mode at home and abroad on the basis of extensive investigation. Put forward the related conception to the comprehensive administrative law enforcement system of the cultural market in Nansha district. It is suggested that, on the one hand, we should set up a comprehensive administrative law enforcement bureau for the cultural market in Nansha district, and independently exercise the district sports bureau, the tourism bureau, the Wen Guangxin bureau, the urban management law enforcement bureau, the supervision and administrative punishment authority, and the public security bureau. At the same time, it plans the terms of reference, the organizational structure, the operational mechanism, the organizational personnel guarantee and the fund guarantee of the law enforcement bureau, and designs the relevant monitoring mechanism. The purpose of this paper is to explore the effective management of Chinese cultural market and the perfection of comprehensive administrative law enforcement system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D922.1;G124
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 章志遠;;相對集中行政處罰權(quán)改革之評述[J];中共長春市委黨校學(xué)報;2006年01期
2 郭正林;城市管理創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)向:從政府管理到公共治理[J];上海城市管理職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年01期
3 錢崇濤,趙敏;試論政府在文化市場管理中的定位問題[J];浙江廣播電視高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2003年01期
4 李勇;;中國城市建設(shè)管理法制化的創(chuàng)新——相對集中行政處罰權(quán)制度及綜合行政執(zhí)法[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2007年06期
5 冷熙亮;國外城市管理體制的發(fā)展趨勢及其啟示[J];城市問題;2001年01期
6 宋超;解析城市管理相對集中行政處罰權(quán)之困惑[J];城市問題;2005年05期
7 吳金群;綜合執(zhí)法:行政執(zhí)法的體制創(chuàng)新[J];地方政府管理;2000年09期
8 李向民;韓順法;;我國深化文化體制改革的理論探析及政策選擇[J];東岳論叢;2010年04期
9 賀榮;;北京市綜合行政執(zhí)法有關(guān)問題的探索和思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年10期
10 王毅;相對集中行政處罰權(quán)制度發(fā)展研究——以城市管理領(lǐng)域為例[J];法學(xué);2004年09期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 王曉剛;文化體制改革研究[D];中共中央黨校;2007年
本文編號：2158511
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/whjj/2158511.html
最近更新
教材專著
