本文選題：文化產(chǎn)業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：行業(yè)效率　出處：《中國(guó)科技論壇》2017年05期

【摘要】：在區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期,文化制造業(yè)、文化批零業(yè)和文化服務(wù)業(yè)在各省市獲得了不同程度的發(fā)展。通過(guò)構(gòu)建測(cè)度指標(biāo)體系,運(yùn)用SBM-DEA模型和Malmquist指數(shù)測(cè)算發(fā)現(xiàn):(1)中國(guó)內(nèi)地文化產(chǎn)業(yè)三大子行業(yè)綜合效率整體偏低,純技術(shù)效率偏低是主要原因。行業(yè)效率的提升仍需依賴技術(shù)水平與管理能力提升;(2)31省市文化子行業(yè)效率水平非均衡特征明顯:文化制造業(yè)綜合效率呈現(xiàn)"西低東高"階梯式分布,文化批零業(yè)和文化服務(wù)業(yè)則整體呈現(xiàn)"低集中—高分散"的空間分異特征。相比而言,多數(shù)省市文化制造業(yè)有了較好發(fā)展,這與中國(guó)制造業(yè)率先獲得發(fā)展相關(guān);(3)2012—2013年,文化制造業(yè)、文化批零業(yè)及文化服務(wù)業(yè)行業(yè)效率增幅最大的依次是中部、西部和東部地區(qū),這體現(xiàn)了中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與文化產(chǎn)業(yè)差異化區(qū)域發(fā)展的階段性特征。
[Abstract]:In the critical period of regional economic transformation, cultural manufacturing, cultural batch and cultural services have developed to different degrees in various provinces and cities.By constructing the index system of measurement, using SBM-DEA model and Malmquist index, we find that the overall comprehensive efficiency of the three major industries of cultural industry in mainland China is on the low side, and the low efficiency of pure technology is the main reason.The improvement of industry efficiency still depends on the improvement of technology level and management ability. The disequilibrium characteristic of the efficiency level of cultural sub-industry in the provinces and cities is obvious: the comprehensive efficiency of cultural manufacturing industry presents the "west, low, east and high" ladder distribution.The cultural batch industry and the cultural service industry as a whole presented the spatial differentiation characteristics of "low concentration-high dispersion".In contrast, most provinces and cities have better development of the cultural manufacturing industry, which is related to the first development of the Chinese manufacturing industry. In 2012-2013, the biggest increase in the efficiency of the cultural manufacturing industry, the cultural batch industry and the cultural service industry was in the central region.In the western and eastern regions, this reflects the stage characteristics of the regional development of China's industrial transfer and cultural industry differentiation.
【作者單位】： 山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)資源型經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)管理科學(xué)與工程學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部新世紀(jì)優(yōu)秀人才支持計(jì)劃“我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)及其集群化對(duì)策”(教技函[2012]80號(hào)) 國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“文化產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新體系理論模型與實(shí)踐比較”(12BGL132)
【分類號(hào)】：G124

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 項(xiàng)歆妮,陳夜雨;“文化全球化”是一種悖論[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1717574