發(fā)布時間：2018-02-10 23:00

  本文關鍵詞： 文化產業(yè) 發(fā)展模式 文化體制改革 東莞市　出處：《福建農林大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：發(fā)展文化產業(yè)，是實現(xiàn)經濟建設、政治建設、文化建設、社會建設、生態(tài)文明建設“五位一體”協(xié)調發(fā)展的重要內容之一。近年來，從中央到地方，都對文化產業(yè)的發(fā)展給予了高度重視。但由于經濟社會發(fā)展上的差異，各地在文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式的選擇上不盡相同。本文對以制造業(yè)為主的東莞市進行典型案例分析，從分析東莞市產業(yè)文化發(fā)展模式現(xiàn)狀及存在的主要問題出發(fā)，指出在進一步深化文化體制改革的大背景下東莞市如何選擇適合自身特點的文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式，以及如何通過政策創(chuàng)新來推進文化產業(yè)發(fā)展。 本文首先對東莞市文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式及其存在的主要問題進行了分析，指出東莞市文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式存在以下四個顯著特征：與城市功能定位相適應發(fā)展文化產業(yè)；緊貼群眾需求提升公共文化服務水平，發(fā)展配套文化產業(yè)；借助漫博會實施文化引進戰(zhàn)略和文化“走出去”戰(zhàn)略；差異化定位建設創(chuàng)意產業(yè)園區(qū)，發(fā)展新興文化產業(yè)。東莞市現(xiàn)有文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式存在的主要問題是：未體現(xiàn)文化名城戰(zhàn)略目標、未充分依托東莞制造業(yè)優(yōu)勢、未充分利用文化資源優(yōu)勢、未與科技和金融等高附加值要素有機結合。本文認為，導致上述問題可能由于東莞文化產業(yè)總體實力不強、文化產業(yè)發(fā)展定位不明確和布局不合理、民眾文化消費能力不足、文化資源保護力度不強、文化人才匱乏、文化產業(yè)投資增速緩慢等諸多因素造成。 在對梳理美國、法國、韓國等發(fā)達國家和北京市、深圳市等國內發(fā)達城市的文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式及成功經驗的基礎上，本文探索適應東莞市自身特色的文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式。本文指出，東莞市可以圍繞全國公共文化服務名城、國家歷史文化名城、全國現(xiàn)代文化產業(yè)名城和嶺南文化精品名城這四個文化名城目標改進其文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式。具體思路為：一方面，東莞市要在政府的指導下，進一步完善政府引導性文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式，系統(tǒng)性地發(fā)展公共文化服務，促進東莞市公共文化服務創(chuàng)新，，以實現(xiàn)東莞市全國公共文化服務名城目標。另一方面，東莞市更需要引入資源依托型文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式，重視歷史文化資源的沉淀作用，合理規(guī)劃、充分調動歷史文化資源促進東莞市傳統(tǒng)文化產業(yè)發(fā)展，以實現(xiàn)東莞市國家歷史文化名城和嶺南文化精品名城的文化發(fā)展目標；同時，突出強調市場在構建現(xiàn)代文化產業(yè)體系過程中的決定性作用，引入市場主導型文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式，結合東莞市差異化定位的創(chuàng)意產業(yè)園、以漫博會以及當?shù)貎?yōu)勢產業(yè)集群，促進東莞市新興文化產業(yè)的集約化發(fā)展和規(guī)模化發(fā)展，以實現(xiàn)東莞市全國現(xiàn)代文化產業(yè)名城目標。最終，東莞市實現(xiàn)政府引導和資源依托與市場主導相結合的文化產業(yè)發(fā)展創(chuàng)新模式，為實現(xiàn)東莞市四個文化名城目標打下良好的基礎。
[Abstract]:The development of cultural industries is one of the important contents for the coordinated development of economic, political, cultural, social and ecological civilization. In recent years, from the central to the local level, Both give great attention to the development of cultural industry. However, due to the difference in economic and social development, the choice of development mode of cultural industry is not the same. This paper makes a typical case study of Dongguan City, which is dominated by manufacturing industry. Based on the analysis of the present situation and the main problems of the industrial culture development model in Dongguan City, this paper points out how to choose the cultural industry development model suitable for its own characteristics under the background of further deepening the cultural system reform in Dongguan City. And how to promote the development of cultural industry through policy innovation. Firstly, this paper analyzes the development mode of cultural industry in Dongguan City and its main problems, and points out that there are four remarkable characteristics in the development mode of cultural industry in Dongguan City: developing cultural industry in accordance with the orientation of city function; Close to the needs of the masses to enhance the level of public cultural services, develop supporting cultural industries; implement the strategy of cultural introduction and culture "going out" with the aid of the Expo; differentiate and build creative industrial parks, The main problems of the current cultural industry development model in Dongguan are: not reflecting the strategic goal of the famous cultural city, not fully relying on the advantages of the manufacturing industry in Dongguan, and not making full use of the advantages of cultural resources. This paper argues that the above problems may be caused by the fact that the overall strength of the cultural industry in Dongguan is not strong, the development orientation of the cultural industry is not clear and the layout is unreasonable, and the people's cultural consumption capacity is insufficient. Cultural resources protection is not strong, cultural talent is scarce, cultural industry investment growth rate is slow and many other factors. On the basis of combing the cultural industry development models and successful experiences of developed countries such as the United States, France, South Korea, Beijing, Shenzhen and other developed cities in China, This paper explores the development mode of cultural industry adapted to Dongguan's own characteristics. This paper points out that Dongguan can serve famous cities of national public culture and national historical and cultural cities. The four famous cultural cities of modern cultural industry and Lingnan are the four cultural cities which aim to improve their cultural industry development mode. The specific ideas are: on the one hand, Dongguan City should be guided by the government, To further improve the government's guiding cultural industry development model, systematically develop public cultural services, promote the innovation of public cultural services in Dongguan, in order to achieve the goal of the famous city of Dongguan national public cultural services, on the other hand, Dongguan needs to introduce the resource-based cultural industry development model, attach importance to the precipitation of historical and cultural resources, reasonable planning, and fully mobilize historical and cultural resources to promote the development of traditional cultural industries in Dongguan. In order to realize the cultural development goals of the famous historical and cultural cities of Dongguan and Lingnan, and at the same time, to emphasize the decisive role of the market in the process of constructing the modern cultural industry system, and to introduce the market-oriented cultural industry development model. Combining with the creative industry park of Dongguan City, promoting the intensive development and large-scale development of the emerging cultural industry in Dongguan, In order to realize the goal of the famous city of modern cultural industry in Dongguan City. Finally, Dongguan City should realize the innovative mode of cultural industry development combining government guidance, resource support and market leading. It will lay a good foundation for realizing the goal of four famous cultural cities in Dongguan.
【學位授予單位】：福建農林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G124

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 汪茂泰;丁翠婷;;安徽省文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式研究[J];邊疆經濟與文化;2008年12期

2 汪明峰;文化產業(yè)政策與城市發(fā)展:歐洲的經驗與啟示[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2001年04期

3 張承良;;論東莞“文化新城”的軟實力建構[J];東莞理工學院學報;2009年04期

4 白雪艷;;我國區(qū)域文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式探究[J];對外經貿;2012年07期

5 張慧娟;;美國文化產業(yè)政策的形成與發(fā)展[J];科學社會主義;2012年06期

6 李小兵;;美國文化產業(yè)的四大特點[J];企業(yè)改革與管理;2011年01期

7 李建中;論社會主義的文化產業(yè)[J];人文雜志;1988年03期

8 安宇,沈山;日本和韓國的“文化立國”戰(zhàn)略及其對我國的借鑒[J];世界經濟與政治論壇;2005年04期

9 許項發(fā);;西安文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式探索[J];西安財經學院學報;2008年06期

10 周建永;王淑娟;;論河北省文化產業(yè)發(fā)展模式[J];唐山師范學院學報;2010年03期

本文編號：1501647