【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的發(fā)展，國(guó)際間資本流動(dòng)越來(lái)越頻繁，為了在激烈競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中生存發(fā)展，很多企業(yè)開(kāi)始走出國(guó)門(mén)，選擇去國(guó)際市場(chǎng)上融資以支持企業(yè)的發(fā)展。由于地理?xiàng)l件、文化、政治等方面的因素，香港成為我國(guó)企業(yè)海外上市的首選。國(guó)家為促進(jìn)我國(guó)資本市場(chǎng)的發(fā)展，積極鼓勵(lì)海外上市企業(yè)回歸國(guó)內(nèi)市場(chǎng)，而這些海外上市企業(yè)為解決融資需求，也紛紛響應(yīng)號(hào)召回歸A股市場(chǎng)交叉上市。自1993年青島啤酒拉開(kāi)我國(guó)企業(yè)交叉上市序幕以來(lái)，交叉上市問(wèn)題備受各界的關(guān)注。已有的文獻(xiàn)指出交叉上市可以提高投資者對(duì)公司股票的認(rèn)知度以及股票的流動(dòng)性，提高公司的治理水平，緩解市場(chǎng)分割和信息不對(duì)稱(chēng)問(wèn)題，使企業(yè)獲得更多的外援融資機(jī)會(huì)。有關(guān)交叉上市是否能提高公司業(yè)績(jī)的研究較少，已有的研究也只是局限在傳統(tǒng)的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)，單純的會(huì)計(jì)指標(biāo)容易被企業(yè)操縱，這在一定程度上使得研究結(jié)果的可信性受到質(zhì)疑。EVA包含更多的信息量，，它對(duì)公司業(yè)績(jī)的解釋能力更為全面，它不僅能用于公司業(yè)績(jī)的評(píng)價(jià)，更是一個(gè)綜合的財(cái)務(wù)管理系統(tǒng)，因此本文擬采用EVA來(lái)衡量企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)，同時(shí)也選取ROE作為對(duì)比，研究交叉上市對(duì)公司業(yè)績(jī)的影響。 本文采用規(guī)范分析與實(shí)證研究相結(jié)合的方法來(lái)研究交叉上市對(duì)公司業(yè)績(jī)的影響。文章首先闡述了本文的研究背景、意義、研究方法以及思路；然后回顧了國(guó)內(nèi)外有關(guān)交叉上市問(wèn)題的研究現(xiàn)狀；已有文獻(xiàn)主要從流動(dòng)性假說(shuō)、投資者認(rèn)知假說(shuō)、約束假說(shuō)等方面研究了交叉上市對(duì)公司治理以及資本成本的影響。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)交叉上市提高了股票的流動(dòng)性和投資者對(duì)公司的認(rèn)知度，有利于降低資本成本，改善經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)。文章第三部分在文獻(xiàn)回顧基礎(chǔ)上做了理論分析，接著采用實(shí)證方法對(duì)本文的假設(shè)做了驗(yàn)證，結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)交叉上市的確可以提高公司業(yè)績(jī)，但企業(yè)交叉上市時(shí)間越長(zhǎng)其業(yè)績(jī)反而下降，即交叉上市后企業(yè)的長(zhǎng)期業(yè)績(jī)呈下滑的趨勢(shì)；在股權(quán)集中度高、股權(quán)制衡度較低以及董事會(huì)規(guī)模較大這三種情況下，A+H股交叉上市公司業(yè)績(jī)?cè)黾语@著高于純A股上市企業(yè)，而獨(dú)立董事所占比越大，交叉上市公司業(yè)績(jī)?cè)黾宇~反而低于非交叉上市公司，這主要是因?yàn)槲覈?guó)企業(yè)的獨(dú)立董事未能真正履行職責(zé)，不能有效發(fā)揮獨(dú)立董事的監(jiān)督作用。文章最后對(duì)本文的研究結(jié)論作了總結(jié)，在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了一些政策建議，但由于時(shí)間和本人能力有限，文章還存在一些局限性，有待進(jìn)一步提高。
[Abstract]:With the development of economic globalization, international capital flows become more and more frequent. In order to survive and develop in the fierce competition, many enterprises begin to go abroad and choose to finance in the international market to support the development of enterprises. Due to geographical conditions, cultural, political and other factors, Hong Kong has become the first choice for overseas listing of Chinese enterprises. In order to promote the development of China's capital market, the state actively encourages overseas listed enterprises to return to the domestic market. In order to meet the financing needs, these overseas listed enterprises have also responded to the call to return to the A-share market cross-listing. Since Tsing Tao Beer opened the prelude to cross-listing of Chinese enterprises in 1993, the issue of cross-listing has attracted much attention from all walks of life. The existing literature points out that cross-listing can improve investors' recognition of corporate stocks and liquidity of stocks, improve the level of corporate governance, alleviate the problems of market segmentation and information asymmetry, and enable enterprises to obtain more opportunities for foreign aid financing. There are few studies on whether cross-listing can improve the performance of the company, and the existing research is limited to the traditional performance evaluation index, and the simple accounting index is easy to be manipulated by the enterprise, which makes the credibility of the research results questioned to a certain extent. Eva contains more information, and its ability to explain the performance of the company is more comprehensive, which can not only be used to evaluate the performance of the company. It is also a comprehensive financial management system, so this paper intends to use EVA to measure corporate performance, and also select ROE as a comparison to study the impact of cross-listing on corporate performance. This paper uses the combination of normative analysis and empirical research to study the impact of cross-listing on corporate performance. This paper first expounds the research background, significance, research methods and ideas of this paper, and then reviews the research status of cross-listing at home and abroad. The existing literature mainly studies the impact of cross-listing on corporate governance and capital cost from the aspects of liquidity hypothesis, investor cognitive hypothesis, constraint hypothesis and so on. It is found that cross-listing improves the liquidity of stocks and investors' recognition of the company, which is beneficial to reduce the cost of capital and improve the operating performance. The third part of the article makes a theoretical analysis on the basis of literature review, and then uses empirical methods to verify the hypothesis of this paper. The results show that cross-listing can indeed improve the performance of the company, but the longer the time of cross-listing, the performance of the company decreases, that is, the long-term performance of the enterprise shows a downward trend after cross-listing. In the three cases of high ownership concentration, low equity system and large board of directors, the performance of A and H shares cross-listed companies is significantly higher than that of pure A-share listed enterprises, and the larger the proportion of independent directors, the lower the increase of performance of cross-listed companies is lower than that of non-cross-listed companies, which is mainly because the independent directors of Chinese enterprises fail to truly perform their duties and can not give full play to the supervisory role of independent directors. Finally, the paper summarizes the research conclusions of this paper, on the basis of which some policy suggestions are put forward, but due to the limited time and my ability, there are still some limitations in the article, which need to be further improved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F276.6;F275;F832.51

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王煒,陳強(qiáng),楊寵懷;試論EVA估價(jià)法[J];安徽商貿(mào)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 何丹;張力上;陳衛(wèi);;交叉上市、投資者保護(hù)與企業(yè)價(jià)值[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2010年03期

3 秦志敏;郭雯;;A+H股交叉上市后公司業(yè)績(jī)走勢(shì)研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2012年04期

4 陸宇建;EVA業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)的創(chuàng)新及不足[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2002年09期

5 陳昀;賀遠(yuǎn)瓊;;雙重上市對(duì)公司治理和公司績(jī)效的影響研究——基于中國(guó)雙重上市公司的證據(jù)[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

6 覃家琦;劉建明;;A+H雙重上市與公司業(yè)績(jī)關(guān)系的實(shí)證分析[J];管理科學(xué);2010年05期

7 鄒穎;;交叉上市的資本成本效應(yīng)研究綜述——基于綁定假說(shuō)的視角[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2009年02期

8 王化成,程小可,佟巖;經(jīng)濟(jì)增加值的價(jià)值相關(guān)性——與盈余、現(xiàn)金流量、剩余收益指標(biāo)的對(duì)比[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2004年05期

9 王化成;李志杰;孫健;;境外上市背景下治理機(jī)制對(duì)公司價(jià)值的影響——基于融資決策傳導(dǎo)效應(yīng)的研究[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2008年07期

10 劉會(huì)敏;;基于EVA的我國(guó)國(guó)有企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)[J];內(nèi)蒙古科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年07期

本文編號(hào)：2500478