本文選題：集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃 + 績效評價體系　； 參考：《浙江工商大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：自2005年光大證券發(fā)行第一只集合理財產(chǎn)品“光大陽光集合理財產(chǎn)品”以來,券商集合理財業(yè)務(wù)重新開閘。集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃由于其專業(yè)理財、風(fēng)險分散、投資范圍廣以及投資比例靈活等一系列優(yōu)點迅速獲得投資者認可,成為理財產(chǎn)品市場上一股不可忽視的力量,其規(guī)模已經(jīng)從2005年的139.52億發(fā)展到目前的5300多億。隨著產(chǎn)品數(shù)量和規(guī)模不斷膨脹,監(jiān)管部門、相關(guān)金融機構(gòu)及投資者越來越重視集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃績效的評估。對其進行全面、科學(xué)的評估會促進行業(yè)的健康發(fā)展,然而,目前我國集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃績效評估體系的研究尚處在起步階段,遠末形成完整和權(quán)威的系統(tǒng),因此,如何建立一個科學(xué)的、有效的評價體系有待于進一步深入和拓展。 本文旨在深入了解券商集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀基礎(chǔ)上,建立一個集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃績效評估體系,對目前市場上的部分產(chǎn)品進行實證研究,得出相應(yīng)的結(jié)論和政策建議。全文共分為6個部分：第一部分,說明本文的選題背景及意義、研究思路及框架安排,并給出本文的創(chuàng)新點及不足之處；第二部分,文獻綜述,該部分主要包括集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃研究現(xiàn)狀、基金業(yè)績評價相關(guān)理論、國內(nèi)外基金業(yè)績評價研究方法及研究現(xiàn)狀這三個部分；第三部分,集合理財產(chǎn)品的概述及發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀。該部分主要包括集合理財產(chǎn)品概述(包括概念、類型以及特征)、開展的三個方面背景以及統(tǒng)計分析其目前的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀；第四部分,基于主成分分析的集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃績效評估體系構(gòu)建。該部分主要可分為基金績效評估體系研究現(xiàn)狀梳理、評價體系構(gòu)建原則、評估體系的構(gòu)建以及對本文選取的綜合評判方法主成分分析進行介紹；第五部分,績效評估體系實證研究,這部分為本文的主體部分,以2010年9月1日至2013年8月31日為樣本期,通過綜合運用Eviews及Excel軟件得到評估體系中34只樣本產(chǎn)品的23個指標值(主要為凈值增長率指標、風(fēng)險指標、三大經(jīng)典指標、M2、信息比率、單因素模型、三因素模型、投資結(jié)構(gòu)及費率指標),最后用通過主成分分析得出績效評價最終結(jié)果；第六部分,主要結(jié)論及政策建議。這部分主要給出本文的幾點結(jié)論及政策建議。 通過本文的分析,得到如下幾點結(jié)論：第一,集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃具有良好的發(fā)展態(tài)勢,未來發(fā)展前景可觀。第二,大部分產(chǎn)品業(yè)績并未超越基準組合,產(chǎn)品投資經(jīng)理具有一定的風(fēng)險分散能力。除了個別產(chǎn)品外,未有足夠證據(jù)表明投資經(jīng)理具備專業(yè)投資理財?shù)膬?yōu)勢。第三,從擇股擇時分析可知,大部分投資經(jīng)理具備一定的選股能力,但不突出,只有少數(shù)具備顯著的選股能力；大部分投資經(jīng)理不具備顯著的擇時能力,少數(shù)具備一定的擇時能力。第四,我國集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃偏向投資小盤股和價值型股票。第五,沒有足夠的證據(jù)表明我國集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃業(yè)績具有持續(xù)性。第六,樣本中排名前五的產(chǎn)品為：東方紅4號,東方紅5號,東方紅先鋒1號,上海證券理財1號及興業(yè)金麒麟2號；排名后5位的產(chǎn)品有：銀河金星1號,華泰紫金3號,中信穩(wěn)健回報,東吳財富1號及東莞旗峰2號。 與以往研究相比,本文創(chuàng)新之處在于：第一,少有文獻對集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃開展背景(特別是法律法規(guī)變更)以及其研究現(xiàn)狀進行總結(jié)。第二,國內(nèi)目前尚無專門針對集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃績效評估體系進行研究的文獻,本文在借鑒目前已有的基金評價體系研究基礎(chǔ)上,致力于構(gòu)建集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃績效評價體系并進行實證研究；第三,在實證研究樣本及樣本期上,由于集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃開展較晚而且近幾年才得到快速發(fā)展,目前已有文獻對集合資產(chǎn)管理計劃業(yè)績方面研究樣本量少而且樣本期短,本文擴充了樣本量以及延長樣本期,力求研究內(nèi)容更為豐富和科學(xué),實證結(jié)果更為可靠。
[Abstract]:Since 2005 Everbright Securities issued the first collection of financial products, "Guangda sun set financial products", securities dealers have re opened their financial services. The collective asset management plan has been recognized by investors as a financial product because of its professional financial management, decentralization of risk, wide range of investment and flexible investment ratio. In the market, a force that can not be ignored has developed from 13 billion 952 million in 2005 to about 530000000000. As the quantity and scale of the product is expanding, the supervision department, related financial institutions and investors are paying more and more attention to the evaluation of the performance of the integrated asset management program. However, at present, the research on the performance evaluation system of collective asset management plan in China is still in its infancy, and a complete and authoritative system is formed at the end of the year. Therefore, how to establish a scientific and effective evaluation system needs to be further developed and expanded.
On the basis of in-depth understanding of the development status of collective asset management plan of securities dealers, this paper establishes a performance evaluation system of collective asset management plan, and makes an empirical study on some products on the market, and draws the corresponding conclusions and policy suggestions. The full text is divided into 6 parts: the first part, the background and meaning of this article is explained. Meaning, research ideas and framework arrangements, and give the innovation and shortcomings of this article; the second part, literature review, this part mainly includes the research status of the collective asset management plan, the related theory of fund performance evaluation, the research methods of performance evaluation of domestic and foreign funds and the three parts of the research status; the third part, the collection of financial products. This part mainly includes the overview of the collection of financial products (including the concept, type and characteristics), the three aspects of the background and the current status of its development; the fourth part, based on the principal component analysis of the performance evaluation system of the collective asset management plan. This part is mainly divided into the performance evaluation of the fund. The research status of the evaluation system, the principle of evaluation system construction, the construction of evaluation system and the principal component analysis of the comprehensive evaluation method selected in this paper; the fifth part, the empirical study of the performance evaluation system, this part is the main part of this paper, from September 1, 2010 to August 31, 2013 as the sample period, through the comprehensive application of Eviews And Excel software obtained the 23 index values of 34 sample products in the evaluation system (mainly net value growth index, risk index, three classic index, M2, information ratio, single factor model, three factor model, investment structure and rate index). Finally, the final results are obtained by the principal component analysis; the sixth part is the main conclusion. And the policy recommendations. This part mainly gives some conclusions and policy recommendations.
Through the analysis of this paper, we get the following conclusions: first, the collective asset management plan has a good development trend, and the future development prospects are considerable. Second, most of the product performance does not exceed the benchmark portfolio, the product investment manager has a certain risk dispersal ability. Apart from some products, there is no sufficient evidence to show that the investment manager has a good performance. Third, from the choice of timing analysis, we know that most investment managers have a certain stock selection ability, but only a few have significant stock selection ability; most of the investment managers do not have significant timing ability and a few have certain timing ability. Fourth, our country's collective asset management plan is biased. Investment small shares and value type stocks. Fifth, there is not enough evidence to show that the performance of China's collective asset management program is persistent. Sixth, the top five products in the sample are Dongfang red 4, Dongfang red 5, Dongfang Xianfeng 1, Shanghai securities finance 1 and Xingye kylin 2; the top 5 products are: Galaxy Venus 1 No. 6, Huatai Zijin 3, CITIC returns steadily, Soochow fortune 1 and Dongguan Qifeng 2.
Compared with previous research, the innovation of this paper is: first, there are few literature on the background of the management plan of collective assets management (especially the change of laws and regulations) and its current research status. Second, there is no literature on the performance evaluation system of collective asset management in China at present. On the basis of the research of the fund evaluation system, we are committed to the construction of the performance evaluation system of collective assets management plan and carry out empirical research. Third, in the sample and sample period of empirical research, the collection asset management plan has been developed late and has developed rapidly in recent years. At present, there has been some literature on the performance of collective asset management plans. The sample size is short and the sample period is short. This paper expands the sample size and extends the sample period, so as to make the research richer and scientific, and the empirical results are more reliable.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.51

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖瑾;;陽光私募基金評價體系研究[J];福建金融;2011年12期

2 李憲立;吳光偉;唐衍偉;;多期基金業(yè)績持續(xù)性評價新模型及實證研究[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2007年10期

3 吳世農(nóng);我國證券市場效率的分析[J];經(jīng)濟研究;1996年04期

4 王聰;證券投資基金績效評估模型分析[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2001年09期

5 汪光成;基金的市場時機把握能力研究[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2002年01期

6 王守法;我國證券投資基金績效的研究與評價[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2005年03期

7 馬達;蔡榮;;券商集合理財產(chǎn)品收費模式研究[J];金融教學(xué)與研究;2009年04期

8 張新,杜書明;中國證券投資基金能否戰(zhàn)勝市場?[J];金融研究;2002年01期

9 莊云志,唐旭;基金業(yè)績持續(xù)性的實證研究[J];金融研究;2004年05期

10 朱有為;包學(xué)誠;;證券公司資產(chǎn)管理業(yè)務(wù)發(fā)展的機遇、定位與路徑分析[J];金融縱橫;2008年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 曹建鋼;A股私募基金績效研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2010年

2 賴叔懿;中國股票型開放式基金績效綜合評價研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

3 王鵬;基金業(yè)績及其影響的實證研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1878320