本文選題：基金業(yè)績 + 絕對持續(xù)性��； 參考：《安徽財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：基金業(yè)績的持續(xù)性反映的是這樣一種現(xiàn)象：市場中前期表現(xiàn)較好的基金傾向于在下一期保持優(yōu)秀,而前期表現(xiàn)不好的基金則難以在下一期提升業(yè)績�；鸬耐顿Y風(fēng)格不同,導(dǎo)致基金的資產(chǎn)配置組合的策略不同,對基金業(yè)績的持續(xù)性會產(chǎn)生一定的影響。本文以此為切入點(diǎn),通過選擇累計凈值增長率和夏普指數(shù)收益率兩個評價指標(biāo)對三種不同投資風(fēng)格基金的業(yè)績持續(xù)性進(jìn)行了比較研究。 文章首先對于基金業(yè)績研究的相關(guān)背景做了介紹,通過梳理國內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)中的研究方法,最終確定了本文采用的評價指標(biāo)和檢驗方法。在實證研究中,依據(jù)晨星公司對基金投資風(fēng)格的分類,將樣本基金分為平衡型基金、成長型基金和價值型基金三類,進(jìn)行業(yè)績持續(xù)性的比較。實證的第一部分檢驗的是三種投資風(fēng)格基金業(yè)績的絕對持續(xù)性,采用橫截面檢驗法,得出平衡型基金的業(yè)績持續(xù)性最優(yōu),其次為成長型基金,價值型基金業(yè)績的持續(xù)性最差。實證的第二部分檢驗的是三種投資風(fēng)格基金業(yè)績的相對持續(xù)性,采用的是列聯(lián)表檢驗法和Kendall協(xié)同系數(shù)檢驗法,選擇了季度數(shù)據(jù)和半年度數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行實證檢驗和比較,綜合兩種方法的實證結(jié)果,平衡型基金的業(yè)績持續(xù)性在兩個時間段都顯著存在,表現(xiàn)最為優(yōu)秀,而價值型基金和成長型基金未能表現(xiàn)出顯著的持續(xù)性,但通過比較發(fā)現(xiàn),這兩類基金在半年度時間段的業(yè)績持續(xù)性表現(xiàn)優(yōu)于季度時間段。
[Abstract]:The persistence of fund performance reflects the phenomenon that funds with better performance in the market tend to remain excellent in the next period, while funds that do not perform well in the early period will find it difficult to improve their performance in the next period. The different investment styles of the fund lead to the different strategies of the fund's asset allocation portfolio, which will have a certain impact on the sustainability of the fund's performance. This paper makes a comparative study on the performance sustainability of three different investment style funds by selecting the cumulative net worth growth rate and Sharpe index return rate as the starting point. The paper first introduces the relevant background of fund performance research, through combing the research methods in the relevant literature at home and abroad, finally determines the evaluation index and test method adopted in this paper. In the empirical study, according to the classification of the investment style of Morningstar, the sample funds are divided into three categories: balanced fund, growth fund and value fund. The first part of the empirical test is the absolute sustainability of the performance of the three types of investment funds. Using cross-section test method, the performance sustainability of the balanced fund is the best, followed by the growth fund, and the performance of the value fund is the worst. The second part of the empirical test is about the relative sustainability of fund performance of three investment styles, using the column table test method and Kendall synergy coefficient test method, choosing quarterly data and semi-annual data for empirical test and comparison. Combined with the empirical results of the two methods, the performance persistence of balanced fund exists significantly in both periods, and the performance is the best, while the value fund and the growth fund fail to show significant persistence, but through comparison, it is found that, These two types of funds in the half-year period of performance sustainability performance better than the quarter-time period.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F830.91;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李昆;封閉式基金業(yè)績持續(xù)性研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2005年18期

2 肖奎喜,楊義群;我國開放式基金業(yè)績持續(xù)性的實證檢驗[J];財貿(mào)研究;2005年02期

3 李學(xué)峰;陳曦;茅勇峰;;我國開放式基金業(yè)績持續(xù)性及其影響因素研究[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2007年06期

4 吳啟芳,陳收,雷輝;基金業(yè)績持續(xù)性的回歸實證[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2003年01期

5 胡畏,聶曙光,張明;中國證券投資基金業(yè)績的中短期持續(xù)性[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2004年04期

6 勞蘭s，

本文編號：1869884