本文關(guān)鍵詞： 票據(jù) 善意取得 票據(jù)流通性　出處：《廈門(mén)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：票據(jù)作為商事交易發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物,適應(yīng)規(guī)�；灰姿璧男逝c便捷。票據(jù)是一種完全的有價(jià)證券,票據(jù)權(quán)利與票據(jù)占有不可分割,票據(jù)權(quán)利的行使以票據(jù)為基礎(chǔ),只有持票人向票據(jù)付款人提示票據(jù)才能受領(lǐng)票據(jù)金額,票據(jù)權(quán)利的行使與票據(jù)的持有不可分割。這使得票據(jù)的善意取得顯得尤為必要。 動(dòng)產(chǎn)的善意取得發(fā)展于日耳曼法的“以手護(hù)手”原則,各國(guó)民法多有涉及,無(wú)論是立法發(fā)展情況還是學(xué)術(shù)研究都很成熟。票據(jù)雖然是動(dòng)產(chǎn)的一種,但票據(jù)自身的一些特點(diǎn)與性質(zhì)決定了票據(jù)權(quán)利不同于一般的動(dòng)產(chǎn)權(quán)利,那么它的善意取得是否可以直接援引一般動(dòng)產(chǎn)善意取得來(lái)適用?本文著重討論票據(jù)適用善意取得的正當(dāng)性以及就該正當(dāng)性作出引申。 全文在考量民法善意取得制度設(shè)計(jì)的基礎(chǔ)上,從票據(jù)自有性質(zhì)出發(fā),以追求票據(jù)流通發(fā)揮票據(jù)應(yīng)有功能為主線(xiàn)、以票據(jù)基本性質(zhì)為支撐、以票據(jù)價(jià)值取向?yàn)槟繕?biāo),從票據(jù)善意取得的可能性和必要性?xún)煞矫鎭?lái)分析出票據(jù)善意取得的正當(dāng)性。 本文第一章對(duì)一般動(dòng)產(chǎn)善意取得的淵源、概念、成立要件、立法價(jià)值進(jìn)行概述,并由此引申出票據(jù)的善意取得。 本文第二章進(jìn)行票據(jù)善意取得的可能性分析,即分析善意取得為何能夠適用于票據(jù)領(lǐng)域。可能性分析主要從兩方面來(lái)進(jìn)行：一是討論票據(jù)善意取得的經(jīng)驗(yàn)基礎(chǔ),即既有的成功先例；二是從票據(jù)的基本性質(zhì)角度出發(fā),分析票據(jù)的有價(jià)證券性質(zhì)、流通性等,說(shuō)明可能性的邏輯根基。 本文第三章進(jìn)行票據(jù)善意取得的必要性分析,即分析善意取得在票據(jù)上的適用是一種邏輯必然。必要性分析的主線(xiàn)是商法價(jià)值取向與基本原則,第一節(jié)將概括說(shuō)明這種必要性是商法價(jià)值及原則的內(nèi)在要求,第二節(jié)將商法價(jià)值取向與基本原則具體細(xì)化,從交易效益與交易安全兩方面出發(fā),說(shuō)明必要性乃市場(chǎng)交易的內(nèi)在要求。 本文第四章將票據(jù)善意取得正當(dāng)性的進(jìn)一步引申,著重討論我國(guó)票據(jù)善意取得制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況,并給予啟示與建議。
[Abstract]:As the product of the development of commercial transaction, bill is an efficient and convenient way to meet the needs of large-scale transaction. Bill is a kind of completely marketable securities, and the right of bill is inseparable from the possession of bill, and the exercise of bill right is based on bill. Only when the bearer prompts the bill to the drawee can he receive the amount of the bill, and the exercise of the right to the bill is inseparable from the holding of the bill, which makes the bona fide acquisition of the bill particularly necessary. The bona fide acquisition of movable property is developed from the principle of "protecting hands by hand" in Germanic law, which is mostly involved in civil law of various countries, both in terms of legislative development and academic research. Bill is a kind of movable property. However, some characteristics and nature of the instrument itself determine that the bill right is different from the ordinary movable property right, so can its bona fide acquisition be applied directly by invoking the ordinary movable property bona fide acquisition? This paper focuses on the legitimacy of bona fide acquisition and its extension. On the basis of considering the design of bona fide acquisition system in civil law, starting from the nature of the bill, the main line of the paper is to pursue the negotiable instrument circulation to play its due function, to support the basic nature of the bill, and to take the value orientation of the bill as the goal. The legitimacy of bona fide acquisition of bill is analyzed from two aspects: possibility and necessity of bona fide acquisition of bill. The first chapter summarizes the origin, concept, essential elements and legislative value of bona fide acquisition of ordinary movable property, and derives from it the bona fide acquisition of bills. The second chapter is to analyze the possibility of bona fide acquisition of negotiable instruments, that is, to analyze why bona fide acquisition can be applied to the field of bill. The possibility analysis is mainly carried out from two aspects: one is to discuss the empirical basis of bona fide acquisition of bills. The second is to analyze the nature and circulation of negotiable securities from the point of view of the basic nature of the bill, to explain the logical basis of the possibility. The third chapter analyzes the necessity of bona fide acquisition of negotiable instruments, that is to say, it is a logical necessity to analyze the application of bona fide acquisition in bills. The main line of necessity analysis is the value orientation and basic principles of commercial law. The first section will generalize that this necessity is the intrinsic requirement of the commercial law value and principle, the second section will detail the commercial law value orientation and the basic principle, from the transaction benefit and the transaction security two aspects, The necessity is the inherent requirement of market transaction. In Chapter 4th, the author further extends the legitimacy of bona fide acquisition of bills, and discusses the current situation of bona fide acquisition of bills in China, and gives some enlightenment and suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門(mén)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.287

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉定華,譚丹;論票據(jù)的善意取得[J];長(zhǎng)沙電力學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

2 李偉群;;除權(quán)判決的效力與票據(jù)善意取得之間的關(guān)系——從中、日票據(jù)法比較的角度[J];法學(xué);2006年06期

3 王果;;票據(jù)外觀性之理論初探[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年04期

4 于瑩;論票據(jù)的無(wú)因性原則及其相對(duì)性——票據(jù)無(wú)因性原則“射程距離”之思考[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

5 祁群;票據(jù)善意取得制度的起源與發(fā)展研究[J];上海金融學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

6 呂來(lái)明;票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得的適用[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年05期

7 門(mén)獻(xiàn)敏;;審判實(shí)踐中票據(jù)權(quán)利的善意取得[J];求索;2007年01期

8 趙萬(wàn)一;論民商法價(jià)值取向的異同及其對(duì)我國(guó)民商立法的影響[J];法學(xué)論壇;2003年06期

9 何本華;;公信力和善意取得制度對(duì)交易安全公平的保護(hù)分析[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇;2005年03期

10 張秀全;商法基本原則研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1999年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1499849