發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-17 16:33

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：票據(jù)權(quán)利的善意取得制度　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 流通性 票據(jù)權(quán)利 無(wú)權(quán)處分 善意取得

【摘要】：票據(jù)的流通性是現(xiàn)代票據(jù)法的靈魂，為促進(jìn)流通，票據(jù)法規(guī)定了對(duì)受讓人權(quán)利的特別保護(hù)。善意取得制度作為保障交易安全、保護(hù)善意受讓人利益的重要制度，在各國(guó)票據(jù)法中均有所體現(xiàn)。我國(guó)《票據(jù)法》第12條對(duì)票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得制度從反面作出了規(guī)定，但過(guò)于籠統(tǒng)，不能適應(yīng)紛繁復(fù)雜的交易活動(dòng)。 本文從法理學(xué)和比較法學(xué)的角度對(duì)票據(jù)權(quán)利的善意取得制度進(jìn)行研究。文章除前言和結(jié)論外，主要分為四部分。第一部分為對(duì)票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得制度的概述，介紹了票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得的內(nèi)涵、理論基礎(chǔ)、性質(zhì)和各國(guó)立法例。第二部分從票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得制度的特殊性出發(fā)，對(duì)其與動(dòng)產(chǎn)善意取得制度和票據(jù)抗辯限制制度作出了比較。第三部分闡述了票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得的構(gòu)成要件，主要包括六個(gè)方面：（1）受讓人的直接前手為無(wú)權(quán)處分人；（2）轉(zhuǎn)讓方在形式上為合法持票人與實(shí)際轉(zhuǎn)讓人；（3）受讓人善意且無(wú)重大過(guò)失；（4）受讓人依照票據(jù)法規(guī)定的方式取得票據(jù)權(quán)利；（5）善意取得之票據(jù)須為可以流通的票據(jù)；（6）受讓人支付合理對(duì)價(jià)。第四部分介紹了票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得的法律效果。受讓人善意取得票據(jù)權(quán)利屬于權(quán)利的原始取得，原權(quán)利人喪失票據(jù)權(quán)利，不得向最后善意受讓人請(qǐng)求返還票據(jù)。至于其是否需承擔(dān)票據(jù)責(zé)任，關(guān)鍵在于其是否在票據(jù)上為真實(shí)簽章。由于票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得是當(dāng)原權(quán)利人和善意受讓人之間的權(quán)利發(fā)生沖突時(shí)，為了維護(hù)票據(jù)的流通性，對(duì)原權(quán)利人的權(quán)利做出了犧牲，為了保證一定程度上的公平正義，法律也規(guī)定了對(duì)失票人的救濟(jì)制度。無(wú)權(quán)處分人是否需要承擔(dān)票據(jù)責(zé)任，同樣取決于其在票據(jù)上是否有真實(shí)的簽章。對(duì)于原權(quán)利人造成的損害，無(wú)處分權(quán)人應(yīng)承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的賠償責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:Negotiable instrument circulation is the soul of modern negotiable instrument law. In order to promote circulation, negotiable instrument law provides special protection to the transferee's rights. The system of bona fide acquisition is an important system to protect the interests of bona fide transferee. Article 12 of our country's "negotiable instrument Law" provides the system of bona fide acquisition of bill rights from the opposite side, but it is too general to adapt to the complicated transaction activities. This paper studies the system of bona fide acquisition of bill rights from the perspective of jurisprudence and comparative jurisprudence. The article is divided into four parts except preface and conclusion. The first part is an overview of bona fide acquisition system of bill rights. This paper introduces the connotation, theoretical basis, nature and legislation examples of bona fide acquisition of bill rights. The second part starts from the particularity of bona fide acquisition of bill rights. It is compared with the system of bona fide acquisition of movable property and the restriction system of bill defense. The third part expounds the constitutive requirements of bona fide acquisition of bill rights. Mainly includes six aspects: (1) the transferee's direct forehand is the person who has no right to dispose; (2) the transferor is in form the legal holder and the actual assignor; (3) the transferee is bona fide and free of gross negligence; (4) the transferee acquires the right to the instrument in the manner prescribed by the negotiable instrument law; (5) an instrument acquired in good faith shall be a negotiable instrument; Part 4th introduces the legal effect of bona fide acquisition of instrument rights. The transferee acquires instrument rights in good faith as the original acquisition of rights and the original obligee loses the rights of instruments. No request shall be made to the final bona fide transferee for the return of the instrument. The key lies in whether it is a true signature on the instrument. Because the bona fide acquisition of the bill right is to maintain the liquidity of the instrument when the rights of the original obligee and the bona fide transferee are in conflict. In order to ensure a certain degree of fairness and justice, the law also stipulates the relief system for the person who lost the ticket. It also depends on whether or not it has a true signature on the bill. For the damage caused by the original obligee, the person with nowhere to share the power should bear the corresponding compensation liability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.287

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 曹艷春;票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得制度的法律探討[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年08期

2 李昕;論票據(jù)法上外觀主義的特殊表現(xiàn)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年05期

3 傅鼎生;;我國(guó)票據(jù)制度未賦予交付轉(zhuǎn)讓的效力[J];法學(xué);2009年12期

4 劉世杰;論對(duì)價(jià)[J];廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期

5 袁碧華;;關(guān)于票據(jù)善意取得的法律思考[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2005年05期

6 于瑩,王艷梅;票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得三論[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1437080