本文關鍵詞：企業(yè)社會責任與企業(yè)經(jīng)營風險、個股系統(tǒng)風險的關系研究　出處：《西南交通大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 企業(yè)社會責任 經(jīng)營風險 系統(tǒng)風險

【摘要】：自我國上市公司開始披露社會責任報告以來,企業(yè)社會責任即在國內(nèi)成為近年來學術研究的熱點話題。有關社會責任的研究主要集中在研究企業(yè)社會責任是否影響企業(yè)的財務績效、企業(yè)價值�；诶嫦嚓P者理論,企業(yè)的社會責任行為其實是兼顧了各利益相關者的利益,但是這些行為能否得到企業(yè)各利益相關方的關注和認同,從而產(chǎn)生良好的利益循環(huán)回饋效應,降低企業(yè)面臨的各種風險,這一問題還少有關注。而對上市公司而言,其面臨各種各樣的風險,但這些風險所形成的綜合風險主要體現(xiàn)在財務績效的波動上；另外,由于上市公司受資本市場投資者的關注,其個股系統(tǒng)風險也是公司風險的一部分,但其并不導致公司財務績效的波動。 本文選取了2010-2012年我國A股上市公司樣本1230家,通過選取各責任維度指標,采用因子分析法計算出樣本公司各年的企業(yè)社會責任得分,以此衡量企業(yè)社會責任表現(xiàn),采用資產(chǎn)收益率的標準差及資產(chǎn)收益率預測模型的殘差絕對值作為經(jīng)營風險的衡量,以綜合市場年化貝塔值作為個股系統(tǒng)風險的衡量,基于利益相關者理論和資源基礎理論研究了企業(yè)社會責任對跨期經(jīng)營風險、公司-年度層面經(jīng)營風險以及個股系統(tǒng)風險的影響。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),企業(yè)社會責任對企業(yè)跨期經(jīng)營風險、公司-年度層面經(jīng)營風險都具有顯著的正向影響,這與國外已有研究結(jié)論不一致；而企業(yè)社會責任對上市公司個股面臨的系統(tǒng)風險的影響卻顯著為負,這與已有研究結(jié)論一致；另外,研究結(jié)果還發(fā)現(xiàn)企業(yè)社會責任的滯后效應,即滯后一期和滯后二期的企業(yè)社會責任表現(xiàn)會對當期經(jīng)營風險產(chǎn)生顯著的正向影響。不同企業(yè)性質(zhì),企業(yè)社會責任對風險的影響程度是不同的。在跨期經(jīng)營風險影響方面,國有性質(zhì)企業(yè)的跨期經(jīng)營風險低于非國有性質(zhì)企業(yè),但是在公司-年度層面風險影響以及個股系統(tǒng)風險影響方面,企業(yè)性質(zhì)的影響則不顯著。 本文從風險這個角度研究企業(yè)社會責任對企業(yè)績效穩(wěn)定性的影響,拓展了企業(yè)社會責任的研究內(nèi)容,豐富了企業(yè)相應風險的影響因素研究；也在研究結(jié)論的基礎上提出了相應的政策建議,為促進上市公司穩(wěn)健經(jīng)營,資本市場健康發(fā)展提供了一定的參考價值。
[Abstract]:China's listed companies began to disclose social responsibility report, corporate social responsibility is to become a hot topic of academic research in recent years in China. The research on social responsibility mainly focuses on whether the research on corporate social responsibility affects corporate financial performance, enterprise value. Based on the stakeholder theory, the social responsibility behavior of enterprises is both the the interests of stakeholders, but these actions can get enterprise stakeholders attention and recognition, resulting in the interests of good circulation feedback effect, reduce the various risks faced by enterprises, there is little attention. And the listed companies, which face various risks, but the risk of the formation of these comprehensive the risk is mainly reflected in the financial performance fluctuations; in addition, due to the listed company by the capital market investors, the stock system risk is A part of the company's risk, but it does not cause the volatility of the company's financial performance.
This paper selects the 2010-2012 A listed company in China by selecting 1230 samples, each dimension of the responsibility index, using the factor analysis method to calculate the Sample Firms each year corporate social responsibility score as a measure of corporate social responsibility, the standard deviation of asset returns and asset yield prediction model of residual absolute value as a measure of operating with the market risk, comprehensive annual beta value as a measure of the stock system risk, stakeholder theory and resource based theory of corporate social responsibility on intertemporal risk management based on the annual level affect the company management risk and stock system risk. The study found that corporate social responsibility of the enterprise intertemporal business risk that company has significantly positive effects of the annual level of business risk, and the existing research conclusions are not consistent; and the corporate social responsibility of the listed company a Influence of system risk shares face is significantly negative, which is consistent with existing research; in addition, the research results also show that the lag effect of corporate social responsibility, namely the lag period and the lag of corporate social responsibility performance two period will have a significant positive impact on the current operating risk. The nature of different enterprises, the influence degree of enterprises the social responsibility of the risk is different. In terms of the influence of intertemporal risk management, the nature of state-owned enterprises across the stage of business risk is lower than the nature of state-owned enterprises, but the company annual level risk influence and stock system risk, influence the nature of enterprises is not significant.
This paper from the angle of risk on the impact of CSR on corporate performance stability, the research expands the content of corporate social responsibility, to enrich the research of the influence factors of enterprise risk; also put forward the corresponding policy recommendations based on the conclusion of the study, in order to promote the sound operation of listed companies, to provide a certain reference value of healthy development the capital market.

【學位授予單位】：西南交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F270;F272.3;F832.51

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 洪旭;楊錫懷;;中國企業(yè)社會責任評價體系的構(gòu)建——以滬深兩市上市公司為例[J];東北大學學報(自然科學版);2011年11期

2 李正;;企業(yè)社會責任與企業(yè)價值的相關性研究——來自滬市上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2006年02期

3 鐘宏武;;企業(yè)捐贈作用的綜合解析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2007年02期

4 張敏;黃繼承;;政治關聯(lián)、多元化與企業(yè)風險——來自我國證券市場的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];管理世界;2009年07期

5 晁罡;程鵬;張水英;;基于員工視角的企業(yè)社會責任對工作投入影響的實證研究[J];管理學報;2012年06期

6 李偉陽;肖紅軍;;基于管理視角的企業(yè)社會責任演進與發(fā)展[J];首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學學報;2010年05期

7 沈洪濤;王立彥;萬拓;;社會責任報告及鑒證能否傳遞有效信號?——基于企業(yè)聲譽理論的分析[J];審計研究;2011年04期

8 馮麗麗;林芳;許家林;;產(chǎn)權性質(zhì)、股權集中度與企業(yè)社會責任履行[J];山西財經(jīng)大學學報;2011年09期

9 孔龍;;企業(yè)社會責任表現(xiàn)對股東價值的保險效應研究——基于A股上市公司的經(jīng)驗數(shù)據(jù)[J];蘭州商學院學報;2013年03期

10 曹亞勇;于麗麗;;政府控制、社會責任與投資效率:2009～2011年上市公司樣本[J];改革;2013年07期

，

本文編號：1365890