【摘要】：產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)是國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的重要組成部分,是區(qū)域綜合實(shí)力的基礎(chǔ)。在全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化和信息技術(shù)的深化改革的國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)背景下,以及我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整的國(guó)內(nèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境中,區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)的地位越來越重要,區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)也越來越激烈。我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力研究起步較晚,研究者結(jié)合我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和國(guó)際上成熟的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力研究理論,構(gòu)建了不同的產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系評(píng)價(jià)產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,取得了良好的研究成果,但其中也存在很多問題。如何科學(xué)地評(píng)價(jià)不同的研究者產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果,分析評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果的科學(xué)性、有效性,成為經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中又一研究課題。綜合評(píng)價(jià)是對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)特質(zhì)的測(cè)量,屬于統(tǒng)計(jì)研究方法,因此需要對(duì)測(cè)量的結(jié)果進(jìn)行構(gòu)想有效性檢驗(yàn)。根據(jù)我國(guó)目前的研究成果,發(fā)現(xiàn)這一領(lǐng)域的研究還很薄弱,這是一個(gè)值得關(guān)注的問題。論文對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)構(gòu)想有效性進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn),以推進(jìn)和完善這一領(lǐng)域的研究。文章借鑒國(guó)際最新研究成果,選取典型的產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)案例,收集我國(guó)2008-2011年區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的數(shù)據(jù)資料,采用驗(yàn)證性因子分析模型進(jìn)行構(gòu)想有效性檢驗(yàn)。并結(jié)合經(jīng)濟(jì)理論和統(tǒng)計(jì)理論對(duì)檢驗(yàn)結(jié)果進(jìn)行分析,指出典型案例模型的優(yōu)勢(shì)與不足,對(duì)其進(jìn)行探索修正,建立了更具構(gòu)想有效性的產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)新模型。論文提出了對(duì)區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)進(jìn)行構(gòu)想有效性檢驗(yàn)的思想,并建立了檢驗(yàn)框架和模型,從而深化了該領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用方法研究。對(duì)區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)構(gòu)想有效性的檢驗(yàn)結(jié)果,可以為從事這一領(lǐng)域的研究人員提供有價(jià)值的參考。
[Abstract]:Industrial economy is an important part of national economy and the basis of regional comprehensive strength. In the international economic background of global economic integration and the deepening reform of information technology, as well as the domestic economic environment of China's economic transformation and industrial structure adjustment, the status of regional industrial economy is becoming more and more important. Regional industry competition is becoming more and more fierce. The research of industrial competitiveness in our country started late. The researchers have constructed different evaluation index system of industrial competitiveness to evaluate industrial competitiveness, combining with the current situation of economic development in China and the theory of international mature competitiveness research. Good research results have been achieved, but there are also many problems. How to scientifically evaluate the evaluation results of different researchers' industrial competitiveness and analyze the scientific and effective evaluation results has become another research topic in economics. Comprehensive evaluation is the measurement of economic characteristics, which belongs to the statistical research method, so it is necessary to test the validity of the measurement results. According to the current research results in China, it is found that the research in this field is still very weak, which is a problem worthy of attention. This paper tests the validity of industrial competitiveness evaluation in order to promote and perfect the research in this field. This paper draws lessons from the latest international research results, selects the typical case of industrial competitiveness evaluation, collects the data of regional industrial economic development from 2008-2011 in China, and uses the confirmatory factor analysis model to test the validity of the concept. Combined with economic theory and statistical theory, this paper analyzes the test results, points out the advantages and disadvantages of the typical case model, explores and modifies it, and establishes a new model of industrial competitiveness evaluation with more conception and effectiveness. This paper puts forward the idea of testing the effectiveness of the regional industrial competitiveness evaluation, and establishes the testing framework and model, which deepens the research on the applied methods in this field. The test results of the effectiveness of the concept of regional industrial competitiveness evaluation can provide valuable reference for researchers engaged in this field.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F121.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李田偉;李福源;;高校教師能力素質(zhì)模型[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2013年03期

2 簡(jiǎn)兆權(quán);肖霄;;區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力二維綜合分析模型的構(gòu)建與運(yùn)用[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2012年16期

3 盧啟程;李怡佳;鄒平;;國(guó)內(nèi)外區(qū)域競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力研究現(xiàn)狀與分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2011年03期

4 陳良;孫紅梅;;我國(guó)省域高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)[J];科技管理研究;2011年02期

5 張繼良;胡榮華;;區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)體系研究——基于江蘇產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)背景[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年06期

6 王亞楠;韓潤(rùn)春;史寶娟;;高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建研究[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2010年32期

7 鄭珍遠(yuǎn);施生旭;賀書偉;;福建省高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)研究——華東六省一市的比較分析[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2010年05期

8 陳紅川;;高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)實(shí)證研究[J];軟科學(xué);2010年08期

9 雷懷英;;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的測(cè)度指標(biāo)體系研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2009年11期

10 肖紅葉;鄭華章;;IMD-WEF國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)比較研究——以中國(guó)為例[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與信息論壇;2008年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張金昌;國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)的理論和方法研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2001年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 吳彥濤;中國(guó)三大都市圈國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力比較研究[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

2 王曉亮;BEC初級(jí)考試構(gòu)想效度的因子分析[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

3 楊薇;基于結(jié)構(gòu)方程的旅游競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力模型[D];中南大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2387088