【摘要】：為了實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速穩(wěn)定增長(zhǎng)，促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)，形成出口優(yōu)勢(shì)，我國(guó)需要制定合適的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策與貿(mào)易政策來(lái)引導(dǎo)和實(shí)現(xiàn)政策目標(biāo)。在制定政策過(guò)程中，貿(mào)易政策與產(chǎn)業(yè)政策協(xié)調(diào)是政府引導(dǎo)經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展，結(jié)構(gòu)健康穩(wěn)定的基礎(chǔ)。而制定協(xié)調(diào)的貿(mào)易政策與產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的難點(diǎn)在于很難把握政策之間的相互作用。 基于結(jié)構(gòu)視角來(lái)研究政策協(xié)調(diào)問(wèn)題，就是在貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)上研究?jī)蓚�(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)的協(xié)調(diào)問(wèn)題。在結(jié)構(gòu)視角下，貿(mào)易政策與產(chǎn)業(yè)政策協(xié)調(diào)的目標(biāo)就是貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的良性互動(dòng)。 通過(guò)考察1980-2012年我國(guó)貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的演進(jìn)過(guò)程，發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的發(fā)展存在許多問(wèn)題，而且貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)之間缺乏協(xié)調(diào)性。通過(guò)采用SITC一級(jí)分類(lèi)法量化貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)，采用三次產(chǎn)業(yè)分類(lèi)法量化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)。在1980-2012年我國(guó)貿(mào)易數(shù)據(jù)與產(chǎn)值數(shù)據(jù)的基礎(chǔ)上計(jì)算得出了我國(guó)進(jìn)口結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)效應(yīng)、出口結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)效應(yīng)和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)效應(yīng)。通過(guò)采用經(jīng)典回歸分析、時(shí)滯分析、格蘭杰因果檢驗(yàn)和向量自回歸分析等方法，，分析了進(jìn)口結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)效應(yīng)、出口結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)效應(yīng)和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)效應(yīng)的相互作用關(guān)系，得出了進(jìn)口結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)是產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)的格蘭杰原因，產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)是出口結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)的格蘭杰原因的結(jié)論。 在明確了進(jìn)口結(jié)構(gòu)、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和出口結(jié)構(gòu)的關(guān)系后，對(duì)于制定協(xié)調(diào)性的貿(mào)易政策與產(chǎn)業(yè)政策提供了有效的參考。這說(shuō)明我國(guó)應(yīng)該制定吸引高新科技產(chǎn)品進(jìn)口，促進(jìn)資本技術(shù)密集型產(chǎn)品出口的貿(mào)易政策以及鼓勵(lì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新，提高質(zhì)量的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策。
[Abstract]:In order to achieve rapid and stable economic growth, promote the upgrading of industrial structure and form export advantages, China needs to formulate appropriate industrial and trade policies to guide and realize the policy objectives. In the process of policy formulation, the coordination of trade policy and industrial policy is the foundation of the government to guide the rapid development of economy and the healthy and stable structure. The difficulty of formulating coordinated trade policy and industrial policy is that it is difficult to grasp the interaction between policies. To study policy coordination from the perspective of structure is to study the coordination between trade structure and industrial structure. From the perspective of structure, the goal of the coordination of trade policy and industrial policy is the benign interaction between trade structure and industrial structure. By examining the evolution of China's trade structure and industrial structure from 1980 to 2012, it is found that there are many problems in the development of China's trade structure and industrial structure, and there is a lack of coordination between trade structure and industrial structure. The trade structure is quantified by SITC first class classification, and the industrial structure is quantified by three industrial classification method. Based on the trade data and output value data from 1980 to 2012, the effects of import structure change, export structure change and industrial structure change are calculated. By means of classical regression analysis, time-delay analysis, Granger causality test and vector self-regression analysis, this paper analyzes the interaction among import structure change effect, export structure change effect and industrial structure change effect. It is concluded that the change of import structure is the Granger cause of industrial structure change, and the industrial structure change is Granger reason of export structure change. After clarifying the relationship among import structure, industrial structure and export structure, it provides an effective reference for the formulation of coordinated trade policy and industrial policy. This indicates that China should formulate the trade policy to attract the import of high-tech products, promote the export of capital-technology-intensive products, and encourage enterprises to innovate and improve their quality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F752.0;F124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙亮,張艷;貿(mào)易保護(hù)理論的發(fā)展及比較研究[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2004年15期

2 許統(tǒng)生;我國(guó)關(guān)稅的貿(mào)易保護(hù)水平分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2002年02期

3 楊小凱;張永生;;新貿(mào)易理論、比較利益理論及其經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究的新成果:文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)(季刊);2001年01期

4 馬捷,周紀(jì)冬;不完全競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、非對(duì)稱(chēng)信息下的最優(yōu)進(jìn)口貿(mào)易政策和產(chǎn)業(yè)政策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2001年07期

5 馬捷;國(guó)際多市場(chǎng)寡頭條件下的貿(mào)易政策和產(chǎn)業(yè)政策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2002年05期

6 Dani Rodrik;;What’s So Special about China’s Exports?[J];China & World Economy;2006年05期

7 田玉紅;;我國(guó)幼稚產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展政策與貿(mào)易政策的協(xié)調(diào)研究[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)(對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2007年05期

8 楊玉華;;“配第-克拉克”定理在我國(guó)工業(yè)的演進(jìn)路徑[J];河南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

9 田玉紅;;美日貿(mào)易政策與產(chǎn)業(yè)政策協(xié)調(diào)體制的比較與啟示[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2008年05期

10 吳偉;;貿(mào)易政策和產(chǎn)業(yè)政策協(xié)調(diào)的思考——以銅版紙行業(yè)反傾銷(xiāo)為例[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);2008年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳虹;中國(guó)對(duì)外貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的關(guān)系研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 李明圓;論日本產(chǎn)業(yè)政策與貿(mào)易政策的融合[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

本文編號(hào)：2377301